Ravid Shwartz-Ziv
Author directoryAlso published as: Ravid Shwartz Ziv
2026
Measure what Matters: Psychometric Evaluation of AI with Situational Judgment Tests
Alexandra Yost | Shreyans Jain | Shivam Raval | Grant C. Corser | Nina Xu | Allen G Roush | Jacqueline Hammack | Ravid Shwartz Ziv | Amir Abdullah
Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: EMNLP 2026
Alexandra Yost | Shreyans Jain | Shivam Raval | Grant C. Corser | Nina Xu | Allen G Roush | Jacqueline Hammack | Ravid Shwartz Ziv | Amir Abdullah
Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: EMNLP 2026
Persona conditioning is widely used to steer large language model (LLM) behavior, but it is unclear whether it induces stable behavioral structure or superficial variation. We propose a framework to measure consistent behavioral tendencies using situational judgment tests (SJTs), multidimensional item response theory (MIRT), and structured synthetic personas, treating responses as observations of latent behavioral variables.
Across large-scale SJT and persona datasets, we find that persona-conditioned behaviors are stable across runs, latent trait scores predict external benchmarks (e.g., TruthfulQA, EmoBench), and MIRT reveals consistent latent structure. We validate these results through human annotation, benchmark evaluation, and internal consistency analyses.
We interpret these traits not as human personality, but as stable behavioral tendencies expressed across contexts. Our results show that scenario-based psychometric evaluation provides a more reliable alternative to classical self-report approaches for assessing LLM behavior, and we release datasets to support further study.
Across large-scale SJT and persona datasets, we find that persona-conditioned behaviors are stable across runs, latent trait scores predict external benchmarks (e.g., TruthfulQA, EmoBench), and MIRT reveals consistent latent structure. We validate these results through human annotation, benchmark evaluation, and internal consistency analyses.
We interpret these traits not as human personality, but as stable behavioral tendencies expressed across contexts. Our results show that scenario-based psychometric evaluation provides a more reliable alternative to classical self-report approaches for assessing LLM behavior, and we release datasets to support further study.
2025
The Illusion of Progress: Re-evaluating Hallucination Detection in LLMs
Denis Janiak | Jakub Binkowski | Albert Sawczyn | Bogdan Gabrys | Ravid Shwartz-Ziv | Tomasz Jan Kajdanowicz
Proceedings of the 2025 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing
Denis Janiak | Jakub Binkowski | Albert Sawczyn | Bogdan Gabrys | Ravid Shwartz-Ziv | Tomasz Jan Kajdanowicz
Proceedings of the 2025 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing
Large language models (LLMs) have revolutionized natural language processing, yet their tendency to hallucinate poses serious challenges for reliable deployment. Despite numerous hallucination detection methods, their evaluations often rely on ROUGE, a metric based on lexical overlap that misaligns with human judgments. Through comprehensive human studies, we demonstrate that while ROUGE exhibits high recall, its extremely low precision leads to misleading performance estimates. In fact, several established detection methods show performance drops of up to 45.9% when assessed using human-aligned metrics like LLM-as-Judge. Moreover, our analysis reveals that simple heuristics based on response length can rival complex detection techniques, exposing a fundamental flaw in current evaluation practices. We argue that adopting semantically aware and robust evaluation frameworks is essential to accurately gauge the true performance of hallucination detection methods, ultimately ensuring the trustworthiness of LLM outputs.