Accurate chart comprehension represents a critical challenge in advancing multimodal learning systems, as extensive information is compressed into structured visual representations. However, existing vision-language models (VLMs) frequently struggle to generalize on unseen charts because it requires abstract, symbolic, and quantitative reasoning over structured visual representations. In this work, we introduce Chart-RL, an effective reinforcement learning (RL) method that employs mathematically verifiable rewards to enhance chart question answering in VLMs. Our experiments demonstrate that Chart-RL consistently outperforms supervised fine-tuning (SFT) across different chart understanding benchmarks, achieving relative improvements of 16.7% on MultiChartQA, and 11.5% on ChartInsights. We conduct robustness analysis, where Chart-RL achieves enhanced performance in 18 of 25 perturbed chart categories, demonstrating strong consistency and reasoning capability across visual variations. Furthermore, we demonstrate that task difficulty and inherent complexity are more critical than data quantity in RL training. For instance, Chart-RL trained on merely 10 complex chart-query examples significantly outperforms models trained on over 6,000 simple examples. Additionally, training on challenging reasoning tasks not only improves in-domain generalization relative to simpler tasks, but also facilitate strong transfer to out-of-domain visual mathematical problems.

We present PLSQLBench, to our knowledge the first benchmark for evaluating whether LLMs can write executable PL/SQL programs, with correctness measured through execution-based tests. Existing LLM evaluations largely target general-purpose code generation or declarative text-to-SQL, leaving procedural database programming underexplored. PLSQLBench contains 2,865 instances: 2,594 single-turn tasks and 271 multi-turn conversations spanning 978 turns. The benchmark combines complex schema-grounded tasks over enterprise-style Spider 2 databases, simpler schema-grounded tasks derived from Spider, and MBPP-derived procedural problems, covering varying levels of database grounding and procedural complexity. Experiments with eight LLMs reveal recurring difficulties in schema grounding, PL/SQL dialect fidelity, procedural control flow, exception handling, and cross-turn consistency. Tool-augmented LLM agents improve performance on several schema-grounded evaluations, although substantial gaps remain. These results highlight procedural database-programming capabilities not directly assessed by conventional code-generation or text-to-SQL benchmarks. Our code is available at https://github.com/oracle-samples/plsqlbench.

Semantic search in retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) systems is often insufficient for complex information needs, particularly when relevant evidence is scattered across multiple sources, because it may fail to retrieve the complete set of evidence. Existing approaches to addressing this problem either rely on iterative agentic retrieval, which can be computationally inefficient, or maintain additional structures such as knowledge graphs, which introduce storage and maintenance overhead. In this paper, we propose GraphER, a graph-based enrichment and reranking framework that (1) leverages the organizational structure of data to capture proximity relationships beyond semantic similarity, (2) constructs a graph at query time based on these proximities, and (3) applies graph-based ranking to surface the top candidate documents. Experiments across table retrieval, multi-hop retrieval, and long-document retrieval benchmarks demonstrate consistent improvements in terms of retrieval completeness. Additionally, GraphER requires no additional graph infrastructure and integrates seamlessly with standard vector stores. The framework is retriever-agnostic, supports multiple forms of proximity, and introduces minimal query-time latency.

Multi-hop question answering (MHQA) is a practical bottleneck in industry applications such as enterprise assistants, customer-support copilots, and compliance analysis, where systems must combine evidence across multiple documents before answering. Large language models (LLMs) remain brittle in this setting: iterative retrieval can commit too early to low-recall trajectories, while planning-only approaches can produce static query sets that fail to adapt when intermediate evidence changes. We propose Planned Active Retrieval and Reasoning RAG (PAR²-RAG), a training-free two-stage framework that separates coverage from commitment. PAR²-RAG first performs breadth-first anchoring to build a high-recall evidence frontier, then applies depth-first refinement with evidence sufficiency control in an iterative loop. This design targets deployment constraints by avoiding retraining cycles, reducing maintenance overhead under changing corpora, and improving scalability across domains. Across four MHQA benchmarks, PAR²-RAG consistently outperforms strong baselines: compared with IRCoT, it achieves up to 23.5% higher answer accuracy and up to 10.5% NDCG gains in retrieval quality.