We present our submission to the Strict-Small track of the 2026 BabyLM Challenge. We study whether a developmentally-inspired curriculum, particularly an adaptive teacher-feedback curriculum based on the student’s own productions, can improve language model pre-training under a 10M word budget. We trained a 58M-parameter student from scratch under five separate conditions that shared the same architecture and tokenizer, isolating different aspects of the training data and curriculum structure. We built an official baseline trained on a cleaned version of the official Strict-Small corpus and also a synthetic baseline trained on teacher model generated data. Then, we developed a fixed curriculum to train a model on the same synthetic child-directed text in three developmental stages: infant, toddler, and child. Finally, we introduced an adaptive feedback curriculum in which the teachers generate additional training data by correcting the student’s productions during training, which adapts the training data according to the learner’s level of understanding. The fixed curriculum demonstrated superior performance on the BLiMP-Supplement, EWoK, and COMPS benchmarks, while the adaptive feedback curriculum substantially improved the Entity Tracking performance in one configuration. However, our official baseline model achieved the highest BLiMP, SuperGLUE, and overall macro-average scores, indicating that our curriculum methods did not produce the overall improvements that we had hypothesized. Our code is available at https://github.com/dcgaines/babylm-2026.