Sarah Ball
Author directory2026
Agentic Reinforcement Learning for Search Misaligns Instruction-Tuning
Yushi Yang | Shreyansh Padarha | Sarah Ball | Andrew Lee | Adam Mahdi
Proceedings of the 2026 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing
Yushi Yang | Shreyansh Padarha | Sarah Ball | Andrew Lee | Adam Mahdi
Proceedings of the 2026 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing
Agentic reinforcement learning (RL) trains large language models to use tools, but its impact on alignment is poorly understood. We study how agentic RL for search affects the alignment of instruction-tuned (IT) models. We find that RL-trained models inherit refusal reasoning by deflecting harmful requests into benign search queries, but this breaks down under a simple diagnostic trigger that elicits a search call before refusal can occur. Under this condition, RL models produce multi-step unsafe search actions and reasoning, reducing search query safety by up to 68.6% in Qwen models and 69.6% in Llama models relative to their IT counterparts. The effect generalises across model families, scales, and RL algorithms. To understand why, we identify linear directions in the residual stream that control search query safety, and show that RL training progressively shifts search behaviour toward the harmful end of this direction. We thus propose representation-guided RL training, which adds a reward penalty based on projection toward the harmful search direction. Training on benign data alone, it restores IT-level alignment within 200 steps without reducing task accuracy and requires no additional training data. Together, our work provides the first framework for diagnosing, mechanistically analysing, and mitigating alignment degradation in agentic RL for search.
Understanding Jailbreak Success: A Study of Latent Space Dynamics in Large Language Models
Sarah Ball | Frauke Kreuter | Nina Panickssery
Proceedings of the 19th Conference of the European Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers)
Sarah Ball | Frauke Kreuter | Nina Panickssery
Proceedings of the 19th Conference of the European Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers)
Conversational large language models are trained to refuse to answer harmful questions. However, emergent jailbreaking techniques can still elicit unsafe outputs, presenting an ongoing challenge for model alignment. This paper aims to deepen our understanding of how different jailbreak types circumvent safeguards by analyzing model activations on different jailbreak inputs. We find that it is possible to extract a jailbreak vector from a single class of jailbreaks that works to mitigate jailbreak effectiveness from other, semantically-dissimilar classes. This suggests that diverse jailbreaks may exploit a common internal mechanism. We investigate a potential common mechanism of harmfulness feature suppression, and find evidence that effective jailbreaks noticeably reduce a model’s perception of prompt harmfulness. These insights pave the way for developing more robust jailbreak countermeasures and lay the groundwork for a deeper, mechanistic understanding of jailbreak dynamics in language models.