Table reasoning, a task to answer questions by reasoning over data presented in tables, is an important topic due to the prevalence of knowledge stored in tabular formats. Recent solutions use Large Language Models (LLMs) for their semantic understanding and reasoning capabilities. A common paradigm of such solutions linearizes tables to form plain texts that are served as input to LLMs. This paradigm has critical issues. It requires LLMs to infer row-column-cell relations from serialized inputs, makes evidence paths harder to trace, and is subject to the "lost-in-the-middle" issue. To address these issues, we propose Table Graph Reasoner (TabGR), a model that represents tables as an Attributed Table Graph (ATG) without task-specific training. The ATG explicitly preserves row-column-cell structure while enabling graph-based reasoning over traceable evidence paths. We further propose a Question-Guided Personalized PageRank (QG-PPR) mechanism to rerank tabular data and mitigate the lost-in-the-middle issue. Extensive experiments across multiple table reasoning benchmarks show that TabGR consistently outperforms state-of-the-art models by up to 9.7% in accuracy.

Large Language Models (LLMs) encode parametric knowledge but can exhibit format bias when resolving knowledge conflicts. When evidence is rendered as text, tables, or knowledge graphs, LLMs can favor certain formats despite unchanged semantic content. Existing work mainly diagnoses this bias, while existing inference-time mitigation remains tied to a single rendered prompt. We propose FaDe, a cross-format knowledge distillation framework that treats evidence format as a controllable nuisance variable and marginalizes teacher predictions over controlled format assignments. FaDe constructs a format-marginalized soft target from these renderings, then trains the student with an asymmetric two-path objective that combines heterogeneous-format debiasing with all-text anchoring. Experiments on ConflictBank and two QA-derived controlled conflict sets with four model backbones show FaDe reduces format bias while improving dual-source coverage and cross-format stability under single-pass inference. Our code is available at https://github.com/Kaia91/FaDe.

Large Reasoning Models (LRMs) achieve strong performance on table reasoning tasks but incur substantial inference cost due to long reasoning traces. Stepwise model routing mitigates this issue by dynamically assigning reasoning steps to smaller or larger models. However, stepwise model routing for table reasoning remains underexplored. Through empirical analysis, we find that reasoning steps involving tables contain two types of tokens with distinct uncertainty distributions: table tokens grounded in table structure, such as cell values and headers, and text tokens representing surrounding natural-language reasoning. The uncertainty of both token types is correlated with the risk that the model makes an error in the next reasoning step. However, existing methods fail to model them separately, leading to suboptimal routing decisions. To address this, we propose EcoTab, a table-aware stepwise routing framework for efficient table reasoning. For each current reasoning step, EcoTab separately models the two types of tokens and estimates their uncertainties, then combines them to estimate the risk of using the small model for the next step, thereby enabling model selection. Experiments on multiple table reasoning benchmarks show that EcoTab consistently outperforms strong baselines and achieves a better balance between accuracy and efficiency.

Stepwise model routing improves the efficiency of Large Reasoning Models (LRMs) by assigning each reasoning step to a suitable model. Recent methods formulate routing as a sequential decision process and train the router with reinforcement learning. However, although they model routing as a process, they still supervise the router with outcome rewards. Such rewards only reflect final answer correctness and fail to evaluate intermediate routing decisions, which can weaken performance and generalization. To address this gap, we propose RoRo, a rubric-guided process reward framework for stepwise model routing. RoRo first collects diverse routing trajectories and constructs preference pairs based on outcome, cost, and process quality. It then trains a Rubricor to generate a query-specific evaluation rubric and a Judge to score routing trajectories under this rubric through alternating optimization. The resulting process rewards are combined with outcome rewards to optimize the routing policy via GRPO. Experiments on five reasoning benchmarks under both same-family and cross-family settings show that RoRo consistently outperforms strong baselines and achieves better accuracy and cost trade-offs.

Long-video understanding remains challenging for multimodal large language models (MLLMs), as informative visual evidence is often sparsely distributed across many redundant frames. Although sampling more frames can improve coverage, it also increases visual encoding overhead and consumes more visual tokens, making compact frame selection essential. However, existing methods often sample candidate frames uniformly before selection, which may require decoding most frames of the video. Moreover, simply selecting frames by query relevance may overlook the global temporal structure needed for coherent video understanding. To address these limitations, we propose VISA, a VIdeo Skeleton-Aware framework for efficient long-video frame selection. VISA exploits sparse I-frame anchors from the native GOP structure to avoid dense candidate decoding and constructs a video skeleton that preserves the coarse temporal progression. Query relevance is aggregated over this skeleton to select informative anchors, followed by cross-GOP refinement to obtain final frames. Extensive experiments show that VISA consistently improves long-video understanding, achieving up to 8.8% relative gain over uniform sampling. Meanwhile, VISA reduces average end-to-end latency by 32.9%–53.6% compared with recent frame selection baselines on LongVideoBench, demonstrating both effectiveness and efficiency for long-video frame selection.

Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) significantly enhances LLMs but faces high prefill latency during long-context processing. While KV cache reuse can mitigate this, current methods relying on shallow features or static heuristics often fail to identify critical tokens for recomputation, resulting in generation quality degradation.We have an insight that KV deviations are more pronounced in deep layers.However, directly extracting deep-layer features from the target model is computationally prohibitive. Crucially, we find that the deep-layer features of a lightweight speculative model exhibit strong consistency with the target model in the selection of critical tokens for recomputation.In light of these insights, we propose SpecCache, which employs deep-layer hidden-state norms from a speculative model as a proxy to guide the critical token selection for target large model.Experiments demonstrate that SpecCache outperforms state-of-the-art (SOTA) baselines. Compared to full KV recomputation, it reduces time-to-first-token (TTFT) by 2.17-3.95× and increases inference throughput by 2.7-5.2×, with negligible degradation in generation quality relative to full recomputation.

Table Question Answering (TableQA) benefits significantly from table pruning, which extracts compact sub-tables by eliminating redundant cells to streamline downstream reasoning. However, existing pruning methods typically rely on sequential revisions driven by unreliable critique signals, often failing to detect the loss of answer-critical data. To address this limitation, we propose TabTrim, a novel table pruning framework which transforms table pruning from sequential revisions to gold trajectory-supervised parallel search. TabTrim derives a gold pruning trajectory using the intermediate sub-tables in the execution process of gold SQL queries, and trains a pruner and a verifier to make the step-wise pruning result align with the gold pruning trajectory. During inference, TabTrim performs parallel search to explore multiple candidate pruning trajectories and identify the optimal sub-table. Extensive experiments demonstrate that TabTrim achieves state-of-the-art performance across diverse tabular reasoning tasks: TabTrim-8B reaches 73.5% average accuracy, outperforming the strongest baseline by 3.2%, including 79.4% on WikiTQ and 61.2% on TableBench.

Table question answering (TableQA) is a fundamental task in natural language processing (NLP). The strong reasoning capabilities of large language models (LLMs) have brought significant advances in this field. However, as real-world applications involve increasingly complex questions and larger tables, substantial noisy data is introduced, which severely degrades reasoning performance. To address this challenge, we focus on improving two core capabilities: Relevance Filtering, which identifies and retains information truly relevant to reasoning, and Table Pruning, which reduces table size while preserving essential content. Based on these principles, we propose EnoTab, a dual denoising framework for complex questions and large-scale tables. Specifically, we first perform Evidence-based Question Denoising by decomposing the question into minimal semantic units and filtering out those irrelevant to answer reasoning based on consistency and usability criteria. Then, we propose Evidence Tree-guided Table Denoising, which constructs an explicit and transparent table pruning path to remove irrelevant data step by step. At each pruning step, we observe the intermediate state of the table and apply a post-order node rollback mechanism to handle abnormal table states, ultimately producing a highly reliable sub-table for final answer reasoning. Finally, extensive experiments show that EnoTab achieves outstanding performance on TableQA tasks with complex questions and large-scale tables, confirming its effectiveness.

Large Language models (LLMs) have demonstrated significant potential in text-to-SQL reasoning tasks, yet a substantial performance gap persists between existing open-source models and their closed-source counterparts. In this paper, we introduce SQLForge, a novel approach for synthesizing reliable and diverse data to enhance text-to-SQL reasoning in LLMs. We improve data reliability through SQL syntax constraints and SQL-to-question reverse translation, ensuring data logic at both structural and semantic levels. We also propose an SQL template enrichment and iterative data domain exploration mechanism to boost data diversity. Building on the augmented data, we fine-tune a variety of open-source models with different architectures and parameter sizes, resulting in a family of models termed SQLForge-LM. SQLForge-LM achieves the state-of-the-art performance on the widely recognized Spider and BIRD benchmarks among the open-source models. Specifically, SQLForge-LM achieves EX accuracy of 85.7% on Spider Dev and 59.8% on BIRD Dev, significantly narrowing the performance gap with closed-source methods.