Current evaluation methods for large language models (LLMs) primarily rely on static benchmarks, presenting two major challenges: limited knowledge coverage and fixed difficulties that mismatch with the evaluated LLMs. These limitations lead to superficial assessments of LLM knowledge, thereby impeding the targeted model optimizations.To bridge this gap, we propose JudgeAgent, a knowledge-driven and dynamic evaluation framework for LLMs.To address the challenge of limited knowledge coverage, JudgeAgent leverages LLM agents equipped with context graphs to traverse knowledge structures systematically for question generation.Furthermore, to mitigate data contamination and difficulty mismatch, it adopts a difficulty-adaptive and multi-turn interview mechanism.Thereby, JudgeAgent can achieve comprehensive evaluations and facilitate more effective improvement of LLMs.Empirical results demonstrate that JudgeAgent enables more comprehensive evaluations and facilitates effective model iterations, highlighting the potential of this knowledge-driven and dynamic evaluation paradigm.The source code is available on https://github.com/DataArcTech/JudgeAgent.

Large Language Models (LLMs) have demonstrated strong mathematical reasoning abilities through supervised fine-tuning and reinforcement learning. However, existing Process Reward Models (PRMs) are vulnerable to reward hacking and require expensive, large-scale annotation of reasoning steps, limiting their reliability and scalability. To address the first problem, we propose a novel reward model approach, Hierarchical Reward Model (HRM), which evaluates both individual and consecutive reasoning steps from fine-grained and coarse-grained level. HRM excels at assessing multi-step mathematical reasoning coherence, particularly in cases where a flawed step is later corrected through self-reflection. Furthermore, to address the inefficiency of autonomously annotating PRM training data via Monte Carlo Tree Search (MCTS), we propose a lightweight data augmentation strategy, Hierarchical Node Compression (HNC), which merges consecutive reasoning steps within the tree structure. Applying HNC to MCTS-generated reasoning trajectories increases the diversity and robustness of HRM training data, while introducing controlled noise with minimal computational overhead. Empirical results on the PRM800K dataset demonstrate that HRM, in conjunction with HNC, achieves superior stability and reliability in evaluation compared to PRM. Furthermore, cross-domain evaluations on MATH500 and GSM8K dataset confirm HRM’s superior generalization and robustness across diverse mathematical reasoning tasks.

Deep research agents rely on iterative tool calls to gather external evidence for multi-step reasoning. While reinforcement learning (RL) improves planning and retrieval behavior, we identify a critical failure mode: tool-call hacking, where agents exploit format- and outcome-level rewards by generating superficially valid tool-use traces without genuinely grounding their reasoning in retrieved evidence. Unlike execution-based tools (e.g., code or math), whose effects are directly observable, the weak observability of causal dependencies between retrieved evidence and reasoning under format- and outcome-level supervision enables agents to maximize surface-level reward signals without genuinely grounding their reasoning in the returned evidence. This results in tool overuse, mode collapse, and decorative or hallucinated tool calls.

We propose Proof-of-Use (PoU), an evidence-grounded RL framework that strengthens the dependency between retrieval, reasoning, and final answers. PoU requires agents to cite normalized evidence identifiers during reasoning and optimizes a multi-objective reward combining step-level citation validity, global Answer–Support Alignment, and adaptive reward mixing. Experiments show that PoU mitigates tool-call hacking, improves task performance, and induces robust tool-use behavior under domain and tool shifts, even without explicit optimization for routing adaptation.

Despite the growing development of long-context large language models (LLMs), data-centric approaches relying on synthetic data have been hindered by issues related to faithfulness, which limit their effectiveness in enhancing model performance on tasks such as long-context reasoning and question answering (QA). These challenges are often exacerbated by misinformation caused by lack of verification, reasoning without attribution, and potential knowledge conflicts. We propose LongFaith, a novel pipeline for synthesizing faithful long-context reasoning instruction datasets. By integrating ground truth and citation-based reasoning prompts, we eliminate distractions and improve the accuracy of reasoning chains, thus mitigating the need for costly verification processes. We open-source two synthesized datasets—LongFaith-SFT and LongFaith-PO—which systematically address multiple dimensions of faithfulness, including verified reasoning, attribution, and contextual grounding. Extensive experiments on multi-hop reasoning datasets and LongBench demonstrate that models fine-tuned on these datasets significantly improve performance. Our ablation studies highlight the scalability and adaptability of the LongFaith pipeline, showcasing its broad applicability in developing long-context LLMs.

Content moderation, the process of reviewing and monitoring the safety of generated content, is important for development of welcoming online platforms and responsible large language models. Content moderation contains various tasks, each with its unique requirements tailored to specific scenarios. Therefore, it is crucial to develop a model that can be easily adapted to novel or customized content moderation tasks accurately without extensive model tuning. This paper presents STAND-Guard, a Small Task-Adaptive coNtent moDeration model. The basic motivation is: by performing instruct tuning on various content moderation tasks, we can unleash the power of small language models (SLMs) on unseen (out-of-distribution) content moderation tasks. We also carefully study the effects of training tasks and model size on the efficacy of cross-task fine-tuning mechanism. Experiments demonstrate STAND-Guard is comparable to GPT-3.5-Turbo across over 40 public datasets, as well as proprietary datasets derived from real-world business scenarios. Remarkably, STAND-Guard achieved nearly equivalent results to GPT-4-Turbo on unseen English binary classification tasks.