Recent advances in reasoning and tool-calling capabilities of large language models (LLMs) have enabled increasingly capable agentic systems. However, existing benchmarks remain limited in task complexity, realism, and domain diversity, and often fail to capture interactions that span multiple domains, limiting their ability to evaluate agents in realistic multi-step settings that require sustained reasoning and coordination. To address these limitations, we introduce T1-Bench, a high-fidelity, comprehensive benchmark for evaluating agentic systems in realistic customer-facing, multi-domain environments, featuring interleaved scenarios that require structured reasoning across multi-turn user-assistant interactions and substantially increasing both compositional complexity and evaluative rigor across 25 domains of varying difficulty. We evaluate T1-Bench using 12 proprietary and open-weight models, providing a reproducible and standardized framework for assessing agent behavior, tool utilization, and conversational quality in complex, multi-step environments. We further complement automatic evaluation with human judgments to strengthen the assessment of qualitative performance. Overall, T1-Bench substantially advances prior benchmarks by increasing task complexity, interaction depth, and domain coverage in simulated multi-domain environments. To facilitate future research on agentic systems, we will publicly release data and evaluation code as open source.

We study the capabilities of large language models (LLMs) in detecting fine-grained anomalies in tabular data. Specifically, we examine: (1) how well LLMs can identify diverse anomaly types including factual, logical, temporal, and value-based errors; (2) the impact of prompt design and prompting strategies; and (3) the effect of table structure and anomaly type on detection accuracy. To this end, we introduce TABARD, a new benchmark constructed by perturbing tables from WikiTQ, FeTaQA, Spider, and BEAVER. The dataset spans multiple domains and eight anomaly categories, including paired clean and corrupted tables. We evaluate LLMs using direct, indirect, and Chain-of-Thought (CoT) prompting. Our results reveal notable limitations in standard prompting, especially for complex reasoning tasks and longer tables. To overcome these issues, we propose a unified framework combining multi-step prompting, self-verification, and constraint-based rule execution. Our approach significantly improves precision and recall, offering a promising direction for robust and interpretable anomaly detection in tables.

Publicly significant images from events carry valuable contextual information with applications in domains such as journalism and education. However, existing methodologies often struggle to accurately extract this contextual relevance from images. To address this challenge, we introduce GETREASON (Geospatial Event Temporal Reasoning), a framework designed to go beyond surfacelevel image descriptions and infer deeper contextual meaning. We hypothesize that extracting global event, temporal, and geospatial information from an image enables a more accurate understanding of its contextual significance. We also introduce a new metric GREAT (Geospatial, Reasoning and Event Accuracy with Temporal alignment) for a reasoning capturing evaluation. Our layered multi-agentic approach, evaluated using a reasoning-weighted metric, demonstrates that meaningful information can be inferred from images, allowing them to be effectively linked to their corresponding events and broader contextual background.