Shinnosuke Hirano
Author directory2026
Rigel: Self-Distilled Score Adaptation for Image and Video Captioning Evaluation
Shuitsu Koyama | Kazuki Matsuda | Yuiga Wada | Shinnosuke Hirano | Daichi Yashima | Komei Sugiura
Proceedings of the 2026 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing
Shuitsu Koyama | Kazuki Matsuda | Yuiga Wada | Shinnosuke Hirano | Daichi Yashima | Komei Sugiura
Proceedings of the 2026 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing
Automatic evaluation of image and video captioning is essential for benchmarking multimodal systems, although standard evaluation metrics show limited alignment with human judgments. Recent approaches using large language models (LLMs), commonly referred to as LLM-as-a-Judge, have improved alignment with human judgments but still suffer from a mismatch between large-vocabulary language modeling and evaluation over a small label set. To address this, we propose Rigel, an automatic evaluation metric for image and video captioning, based on self-distilled score adaptation. The metric employs an evaluation-specific scoring head distilled from a frozen LLM, which captures judgment signals in a task-aligned space without relying on large-vocabulary token sets. We then refine the LLM backbone with human judgment data. To train Rigel, we constructed the Vid-Lepus dataset, which contains 3,338 video clips, 33,380 reference captions, and 5,637 candidate captions. Experiments on multiple benchmarks show that Rigel outperforms state-of-the-art metrics, achieving over 10-point improvements on ActivityNet-Fact in the reference-free setting.
2025
VELA: An LLM-Hybrid-as-a-Judge Approach for Evaluating Long Image Captions
Kazuki Matsuda | Yuiga Wada | Shinnosuke Hirano | Seitaro Otsuki | Komei Sugiura
Proceedings of the 2025 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing
Kazuki Matsuda | Yuiga Wada | Shinnosuke Hirano | Seitaro Otsuki | Komei Sugiura
Proceedings of the 2025 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing
In this study, we focus on the automatic evaluation of long and detailed image captions generated by multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs). Most existing automatic evaluation metrics for image captioning are primarily designed for short captions and are not suitable for evaluating long captions. Moreover, recent LLM-as-a-Judge approaches suffer from slow inference due to their reliance on autoregressive inference and early fusion of visual information. To address these limitations, we propose VELA, an automatic evaluation metric for long captions developed within a novel LLM-Hybrid-as-a-Judge framework. Furthermore, we propose LongCap-Arena, a benchmark specifically designed for evaluating metrics for long captions. This benchmark comprises 7,805 images, the corresponding human-provided long reference captions and long candidate captions, and 32,246 human judgments from three distinct perspectives: Descriptiveness, Relevance, and Fluency. We demonstrated that VELA outperformed existing metrics and achieved superhuman performance on LongCap-Arena.