Production Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) systems serve repeated queries over evolving document corpora under user-specific access constraints. Standard pipelines perform full retrieval and generation for every request, wasting computation on recurring queries. Naive caching reduces latency but introduces safety failures: stale evidence from updated documents, unauthorized content crossing access boundaries, and superseded passages no longer reflecting source truth. These violations are invisible on academic benchmarks yet unacceptable in enterprise deployment. We introduce SSC (Safe and Sufficient Caching), a validated evidence reuse framework for production RAG. SSC caches evidence chunks (not generated answers) with perchunk provenance metadata, and enforces hard validity constraints before reuse: access-control gating ensures user authorization, and freshness verification confirms source-document currency. Only evidence passing both checks enters a utility-based ranking stage balancing relevance, source trust, historical utility, and serving cost. This separation of safety from efficiency is the central contribution. On WebQuestions and HotpotQA, SSC maintains full quality parity with unrestricted retrieval baselines, confirming zero degradation from evidence reuse. On a proprietary InternalQA workload with role based access control and document versioning, it reduces end-to-end latency by 22% and retrieval cost by 34% while achieving zero invalid reuse, compared to 3.4-9.8% violation rates for standard caching and 0.3-8.2% for TTL-based invalidation. The method is training-free, retriever-agnostic, and deploys as a thin validation layer in existing RAG pipelines.

Multi-Agent Debate (MAD) frameworks improve factual reliability in large language models (LLMs) by allowing agents to critiqueand refine one another’s reasoning. Yet, existing MAD systems are computationally expensive and prone to degradation under pro-longed debates due to redundant exchanges and unstable judging. We propose a lightweight,industry-deployable alternative that unifies Selective Debate Initiation (SDI) with Evidence Weighted Self-Consistency (EWSC) for adaptive, debate-on-demand reasoning. SDI dynamically predicts when debate is necessary by detecting confidence-likelihood misalignment and semantic disagreement, skippingwell-aligned queries to conserve computation. EWSC replaces a single-judge verdict with a variance-aware, evidence-weighted aggregation across paraphrased evaluations, yielding more stable factual judgments. Combined, SDI and EWSC reduce token consumption by nearly 50% while improving both accuracy and calibration. Evaluated on BoolQ, CosmosQA, and an internal QnA benchmark, our framework achieves higher factual robustness and efficiency, demonstrating that scalable, epistemically reliable multi-agent reasoning is practical for real-world LLM deployments.

Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) systems degrade sharply under extreme noise,where irrelevant or redundant passages dominate. Current methods-fixed top-k retrieval, cross-encoder reranking, or policy based iteration-depend on static heuristics orcostly reinforcement learning, failing to assess evidence sufficiency, detect subtle mismatches, or reduce redundancy, leading to hallucinations and poor grounding. We introduce ReflectiveRAG, a lightweight yet reasoning-driven architecture that enhances factual grounding through two complementary mechanisms: Self-Reflective Retrieval (SRR) and Contrastive Noise Removal (NR). SRR employs small language model as a decision controller that iteratively evaluates evidence sufficiency, enabling adaptive query reformulation withoutfixed schedules or policy training. NR further refines retrieved content via embedding-based contrastive filtering, enforcing semanticsparsity and removing redundant or tangential passages. Evaluated on WebQuestions, HotpotQA (distractor setting) and InternalQAwith 50M Common Crawl distractors, ReflectiveRAG achieves substantial gains over strong baselines-including DeepRAG-improving EMby +2.7 pp and F1 by +2.5 pp, while reducing evidence redundancy by 30.88% with only 18 ms additional latency. Ablation studies con-firm that SRR and NR jointly drive both factual accuracy and efficiency, validating our central claim that retrieval reasoning and contrastivefiltering can outperform large-scale policy optimization in RAG.

Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) systems degrade sharply under extreme noise, where relevant evidence is sparse and easily pruned by static retrieval decisions. Existing approaches fixed top-k retrieval, hierarchical chunking, cross-encoder reranking, or policy-based iterative control- either rely on rigid heuristics or incur substantial computational overhead, and often fail to recover context-dependent evidence without introducing redundancy or latency. We introduce NEST (Nested Evidence Survival for Retrieval), a lightweight, training-free RAG framework that improves factual grounding by explicitly separating recall amplification from precision selection. NEST first maximizes recall through Nested Evidence Survival, evaluating candidates under nested retrieval contexts to rescue evidence that would otherwise be pruned by static chunking. It then applies a survival-consistent Mean Reciprocal Rank (MRR) selection mechanism to retain evidence that remains salient across retrieval scopes, removing redundancy without harming recall. Evaluated on WebQuestions, HotpotQA (distractor setting), and a proprietary InternalQA benchmark with 50M Common Crawl distractors, NEST consistently outperforms strong adaptive RAG baselines, including DeepRAG, improving EM by up to +2.4 pp and F1 by +2.1 pp, while increasing retrieval recall by +6.8 pp. These gains are achieved with only 12–18 ms additional latency. Ablation studies confirm that Nested Evidence Survival drives recall improvements, while MRR-based selection converts these gains into precision, demonstrating that recall-first retrieval with principled pruning can outperform iterative control and model scaling in retrieval-augmented generation.