Reinforcement learning with verifiable rewards (RLVR) directly optimizes verifier-defined outcomes for multi-turn tool-use agents, yet its trajectory-level credit assignment conflates heterogeneous per-turn outcomes into a single reward signal. On-policy distillation provides dense per-token supervision but uses a teacher-defined token-level objective and can be prone to gradient concentration collapse. We introduce CrEST, a hierarchical credit assignment framework that anchors each sampled token’s scalar advantage sign to verified rewards while incorporating dense magnitude signals from a privileged self-teacher. CrEST resolves credit at two levels: turn-segmented verified advantages address inter-turn dilution, while entropy-gated self-teacher modulation refines intra-turn token contributions. Experiments on BFCL V3 and WildToolBench show that CrEST consistently outperforms both RL and distillation baselines across two model scales, with the largest gains on long-trajectory and strict session-level metrics. Our work demonstrates that the teacher’s role in policy optimization can be reduced from determining token-level reinforcement or suppression to modulating update magnitudes, enabling dense credit assignment while keeping verifier rewards as the training objective.

Addressing the disparity between predictions and actual results can enable individuals to expand their thought processes and stimulate self-reflection, thus promoting accurate planning. In this research, we present PreAct, an agent framework that integrates prediction, reasoning, and action. By utilizing the information derived from predictions, the large language model (LLM) agent can provide a wider range and more strategically focused reasoning. This leads to more efficient actions that aid the agent in accomplishing intricate tasks. Our experimental results show that PreAct surpasses the ReAct method in completing complex tasks and that PreAct’s performance can be further improved when paired with other memory or selection strategy techniques. We presented the model with varying quantities of historical predictions and discovered that these predictions consistently enhance LLM planning. The variances in single-step reasoning between PreAct and ReAct indicate that PreAct indeed has benefits in terms of diversity and strategic orientation over ReAct.