Named Entity Recognition (NER) models trained on clean text often fail on real-world data containing orthographic noise. Work on NER for Persian is emerging, but it has not yet explored the orthographic robustness of models to perturbations often exhibited in user-generated content. We evaluate ParsBERT, ParsBERT v2.0, BertNER, and two XLM-r-based models on a subset of Persian-NER-Dataset-500k after applying eleven different perturbations, including simulated typos, code-switching, and segmentation errors. All models were competitive with each other, but XLM-r-large consistently displayed the best robustness to perturbations. Code-switching, typos, similar character swaps, segmentation errors, and noisy text all decreased F1 scores, while Latinized numbers increased F1 scores in ParsBERT. Removing diacritics, zero-width non-joiners, and normalizing Yeh/Kaf all did not have an effect on F1. These findings suggest that Persian NER models require improvement for performance on noisy text, and that the Perso-Arabic script introduces unique factors into NER not present in many high-resource languages, such as code-switching and Eastern Arabic numerals. This work creates a foundation for the development of robust Persian NER models and highlights the necessity of evaluating low-resource NER models under challenging and realistic conditions.

Kazakh is a Turkic language using the Arabic, Cyrillic, and Latin scripts, making it unique in terms of optical character recognition (OCR). Work on OCR for low-resource Kazakh scripts is very scarce, and no OCR benchmarks or images exist for the Arabic and Latin scripts. We construct a synthetic OCR dataset of 7,219 images for all three scripts with font, color, and noise variations to imitate real OCR tasks. We evaluated three multimodal large language models (MLLMs) on a subset of the benchmark for OCR and language identification: Gemma-3-12B-it, Qwen2.5-VL-7B-Instruct, and Llama-3.2-11B-Vision-Instruct. All models are unsuccessful with Latin and Arabic script OCR, and fail to recognize the Arabic script as Kazakh text, misclassifying it as Arabic, Farsi, and Kurdish. We further compare MLLMs with a classical OCR baseline and find that while traditional OCR has lower character error rates, MLLMs fail to match this performance. These findings show significant gaps in current MLLM capabilities to process low-resource Abjad-based scripts and demonstrate the need for inclusive models and benchmarks supporting low-resource scripts and languages.