Tian Tan
Author directory2026
Not all Negation Cues are Equal: Affixal Negations Yield Better Negation Understanding
Tian Tan | Eduardo Blanco
Proceedings of the 2026 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing
Tian Tan | Eduardo Blanco
Proceedings of the 2026 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing
Negation remains a longstanding challenge for both language models (LMs) and large language models (LLMs). Prior work mainly focuses on a small set of high-frequency single-word negation cues, such as "not" and "never", with limited exploration of broader negation types and modern LLMs. To address this gap, we construct NegCue, a large-scale dataset containing over 1.8M samples spanning single-word, multi-word, and affixal negation with more than 200 unique cues. We further pre-train both encoder-only LMs and LLMs on NegCue to investigate how different negation types affect negation understanding. Experiments on five downstream benchmarks show that negation types contribute unevenly to performance gains under the same training scale. In particular, affixal negation yields the largest improvements, while the gains from the commonly studied single-word negation are remain modest. Moreover, our results demonstrate that further pre-training improves negation understanding for both LMs and LLMs.
AnyAudio-Judge: A Dynamic Rubric-Based Benchmark and Evaluator for Audio Instruction Following
Haitao Li | Tian Tan | Yang Yuguang | Shan Yang | Xie Chen
Proceedings of the 2026 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing
Haitao Li | Tian Tan | Yang Yuguang | Shan Yang | Xie Chen
Proceedings of the 2026 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing
The rapid advancement of instruction-guided audio generation has highlighted the critical need for robust alignment evaluation. Current automated evaluation methods heavily rely on holistic scoring from general-purpose large language models, which struggle to decouple complex instructions, lack interpretability, and fail to capture fine-grained attribute mismatches. To address this, we introduce a novel dynamic rubric-based evaluation paradigm that adaptively decomposes complex audio captions into a variable number of independent, verifiable binary rubric items. To rigorously benchmark this capability, we propose the AnyAudio-Judge Bench, a comprehensive, bilingual benchmark comprising 7,920 meticulously curated samples across four diverse audio domains (speech, sound, music, and mixed), featuring deliberately constructed hard negatives. Furthermore, we construct a large-scale corpus of 105K samples with explicit Chain-of-Thought (CoT) rationales to train our dedicated evaluator, the AnyAudio-Judge model. By employing a training pipeline that combines Supervised Fine-Tuning (SFT) and Group Relative Policy Optimization (GRPO), our model successfully aligns its reasoning paths with the rubric-based scoring mechanism. Extensive experiments demonstrate that AnyAudio-Judge not only significantly enhances zero-shot alignment detection compared to state-of-the-art baselines, but also provides precise and interpretable reward signals that substantially improve instruction alignment in downstream reinforcement learning for audio generation.