The increasing reliance on Large Language Models (LLMs) across various domains extends to education, where students progressively use generative AI as a tool for learning. While prior work has examined LLMs’ mathematical ability, their reliability in grading authentic student problem-solving processes and delivering effective feedback remains underexplored. This study introduces MathEDU, a dataset consisting of student problem-solving processes in mathematics and corresponding teacher-written feedback. We systematically evaluate the reliability of various models across three hierarchical tasks: answer correctness classification, error identification, and feedback generation. Experimental results show that fine-tuning strategies effectively improve performance in classifying correctness and locating erroneous steps. However, the generated feedback across models shows a considerable gap from teacher-written feedback. Critically, the generated feedback is often verbose and fails to provide targeted explanations for the student’s underlying misconceptions. This emphasizes the urgent need for trustworthy and pedagogy-aware AI feedback in education.

Due to the remarkable language understanding and generation abilities of large language models (LLMs), their use in educational applications has been explored. However, little work has been done on investigating the pedagogical ability of LLMs in helping students to learn mathematics. In this position paper, we discuss the challenges associated with employing LLMs to enhance students’ mathematical problem-solving skills by providing adaptive feedback. Apart from generating the wrong reasoning processes, LLMs can misinterpret the meaning of the question, and also exhibit difficulty in understanding the given questions’ rationales when attempting to correct students’ answers. Three research questions are formulated.