Molecular design is a central task in drug discovery that requires precise structural reasoning and domain knowledge. While large language models (LLMs) have shown promise in generating high-level editing intentions in natural language, they often struggle to faithfully execute these modifications, particularly when operating on non-intuitive representations like SMILES. We introduce MECo, a framework that bridges reasoning and execution by translating editing actions into executable code. MECo reformulates molecular modification for LLMs as a cascaded framework: generating human-interpretable editing intentions from a molecule and property goal, followed by translating those intentions into executable structural edits via code generation. Our approach achieves over 98% accuracy in reproducing held-out realistic edits derived from chemical reactions and target-specific compound pairs. On downstream benchmarks spanning physicochemical properties and target activities, MECo substantially improves consistency by 38-86 percentage points to 90%+ and achieves higher success rates over SMILES-based baselines while preserving structural similarity. By aligning intention with execution, MECo enables consistent, controllable and interpretable molecular design, laying the foundation for high-fidelity feedback loops and collaborative human–AI workflows in drug discovery.

Multi-step retrosynthetic planning is a fundamental challenge in organic chemistry, traditionally modeled as a combinatorial search problem guided by single-step prediction models. However, this search-centric paradigm often disconnects from the explicit chemical reasoning processes employed by human experts. In this paper, we propose R³ (Reinforced Reasoning Retrosynthesis), a novel framework that reformulates this task as end-to-end generative reasoning. Instead of traversing a search tree, R³ simulates the problem-solving logic of chemists to directly generate complete synthetic pathways. To achieve this, we initialize the model with domain knowledge and employ end-to-end Reinforcement Learning (RL) to optimize the entire planning policy. Experimental results on Retrobench show that R³ achieves a state-of-the-art Top-1 accuracy of 43.7%, demonstrating that generative reasoning offers a superior alternative to traditional search algorithms in solving complex retrosynthetic problems.