Weihong Xu
Author directory2026
When Should Models Change Their Minds? Contextual Belief Management in Large Language Models
Haoming Xu | Weihong Xu | Zongrui Li | Mengru Wang | Yunzhi Yao | Chiyu Wu | Jin Shang | Yu Gong | Shumin Deng
Proceedings of the 2026 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing
Haoming Xu | Weihong Xu | Zongrui Li | Mengru Wang | Yunzhi Yao | Chiyu Wu | Jin Shang | Yu Gong | Shumin Deng
Proceedings of the 2026 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing
Long-horizon interactions require language models to manage accumulating information: when to update their state, when to preserve their state, and what to ignore. We study this challenge as Contextual Belief Management (CBM): maintaining a predicted belief state aligned with formal evidence while isolating task-irrelevant noise. To make CBM measurable, we introduce , a closed-world benchmark spanning Rule Discovery and Circuit Diagnosis, where a finite belief space and symbolic verifiers enable exact turn-level evaluation. diagnoses three failures: Failed Stay, Failed Update, and Failed Isolation. Across multiple LLMs, vanilla models exhibit severe CBM failures, while explicit belief-tracking prompts provide limited gains. In contrast, reinforcement learning with belief-state rewards reduces failure rates by 70.9% on average. Further probing reveals latent belief-state dynamics behind these failures, and representation-level steering reduces failure rates by 46.1% across two tasks.
Illusions of Confidence? Diagnosing LLM Truthfulness via Neighborhood Consistency
Haoming Xu | Ningyuan Zhao | Yunzhi Yao | Weihong Xu | Hongru Wang | Xinle Deng | Shumin Deng | Jeff Z. Pan | Huajun Chen | Ningyu Zhang
Proceedings of the 64th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers)
Haoming Xu | Ningyuan Zhao | Yunzhi Yao | Weihong Xu | Hongru Wang | Xinle Deng | Shumin Deng | Jeff Z. Pan | Huajun Chen | Ningyu Zhang
Proceedings of the 64th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers)
As Large Language Models (LLMs) are increasingly deployed in real-world settings, correctness alone is insufficient. Reliable deployment requires maintaining truthful beliefs under contextual perturbations. Existing evaluations largely rely on point-wise confidence like Self-Consistency, which can mask brittle belief. We show that even facts answered with perfect self-consistency can rapidly collapse under mild contextual interference. To address this gap, we propose Neighbor-Consistency Belief (NCB), a structural measure of belief robustness that evaluates response coherence across a conceptual neighborhood. To validate the efficiency of NCB, we introduce a new cognitive stress-testing protocol that probes outputs stability under contextual interference. Experiments across multiple LLMs show that the performance of high-NCB data is relatively more resistant to interference. Finally, we present Structure-Aware Training (SAT), which optimizes context-invariant belief structure and reduces long-tail knowledge brittleness by approximately 30%.