LLM role-playing, i.e., using large language models (LLMs) to simulate specific personas, has emerged as a key capability in various applications, such as companionship, content creation, and digital games. While current models effectively capture character tones and knowledge, simulating the inner thoughts behind their behaviors remains a non-trivial challenge. Towards cognitive simulation in LLM role-play, previous efforts have mainly suffered from two critical deficiencies: the lack of high-quality datasets with explicit reasoning traces and the absence of reliable reward signals aligned with human preferences. In this paper, we propose HER (Human Emulation Reasoning), a unified framework for cognitive-level persona simulation. HER introduces a dual-layer thinking mechanism that strictly distinguishes characters’ first-person thinking processes from LLMs’ third-person reasoning. To bridge the aforementioned gaps, we curate a reasoning-augmented role-playing dataset via a reverse engineering strategy for supervised learning, and construct human-aligned evaluation principles and preference-based reward models for role-play reinforcement learning. Leveraging these resources, we train HER models based on the Qwen3-32B backbone via a hybrid paradigm of supervised learning (SL) and reinforcement learning from human feedback (RLHF). Extensive experiments validate the effectiveness of our approach. Notably, our models significantly outperform the Qwen3-32B baseline, achieving a 30.26% on the CoSER benchmark and a 14.97% on the MiniMax Benchmark. Our datasets, evaluation principles, and trained models will be released to facilitate future research in cognitive-level LLM role-playing.

Large Language Models (LLMs) have demonstrated remarkable capabilities in reasoning and generation, serving as the foundation for advanced persona simulation and Role-Playing Language Agents (RPLAs). However, achieving authentic alignment with human cognitive and behavioral patterns remains a critical challenge for these agents. We present HumanLLM, a framework treating psychological patterns as interacting causal forces.We construct 244 patterns from ∼12,000 academic papers and synthesize 11,359 scenarios where 2-5 patterns reinforce, conflict, or modulate each other, with multi-turn conversations expressing inner thoughts, actions, and dialogue.Our dual-level checklists evaluate both individual pattern fidelity and emergent multi-pattern dynamics, achieving strong human alignment (r=0.90) while revealing that holistic metrics conflate simulation accuracy with social desirability.HumanLLM-8B outperforms Qwen3-32B on multi-pattern dynamics despite 4× fewer parameters, demonstrating that authentic anthropomorphism requires cognitive modeling—simulating not just what humans do, but the psychological processes generating those behaviors.Our dataset, code, and model are available at:https://github.com/YJGoodbye2024/HumanLLM

As large language models (LLMs) grow more capable, they face increasingly diverse and complex tasks, making reliable evaluation challenging. The paradigm of LLMs as judges has emerged as a scalable solution, yet prior work primarily focuses on simple settings. Their reliability in complex tasks—where multi-faceted rubrics, unstructured reference answers, and nuanced criteria are critical—remains understudied. In this paper, we constructed ComplexEval Bench, a challenge benchmark designed to systematically expose and quantify Auxiliary Information Induced Biases. We systematically investigated and validated 6 previously unexplored biases across 12 basic and 3 advanced scenarios. Key findings reveal: (1) all evaluated models exhibit significant susceptibility to these biases, with bias magnitude scaling with task complexity; (2) notably, Large Reasoning Models (LRMs) show paradoxical vulnerability. Our in-depth analysis offers crucial insights for improving the accuracy and verifiability of evaluation signals, paving the way for more general and robust evaluation models.