Resource constraints often limit the parameter capacity of Large Language Models (LLMs), thereby hindering their performance. Although existing approaches leverage parameter sharing to reuse a fixed set of parameters within constrained budgets, they typically require each layer to fulfill multiple roles over a fixed number of iterations. This design compromises both efficiency and adaptability. In this work, we propose the Zero Token Transformer (ZTT), which employs a head-tail decoupled parameter cycling strategy. Specifically, we decouple the first (head) and last (tail) layers from the parameter cycling process, enabling iterative refinement solely within the intermediate layers. Furthermore, we introduce a Zero-Token Mechanism, wherein a virtual token with a trainable key and a zero-valued vector functions as a standard token. The resulting attention scores not only reflect the computational significance of each layer but also facilitate dynamic early exiting, thereby preserving overall model accuracy. Our approach achieves superior performance under strict parameter constraints, substantially reduces computational overhead via early exits, and can be seamlessly integrated into the fine-tuning of existing pre-trained models, improving both efficiency and adaptability.

Current Text-to-SQL reasoning models often lack integrated execution feedback during generation, and most existing approaches utilize feedback only for post-hoc correction. This separation not only limits real-time error correction, but may also introduce mistakes by altering otherwise correct SQL queries. To address these challenges, we present ReEx-SQL (Reasoning with Execution-Aware Reinforcement Learning), a Text-to-SQL framework that interacts with the SQL execution engine during decoding and dynamically adjusts reasoning based on execution feedback, thereby enabling context-sensitive query refinement and improved accuracy. ReEx-SQL achieves this through structured prompts with markup tags and a stepwise rollout strategy that incorporates execution feedback at each generation stage. For policy supervision, we design a composite reward function—featuring an exploration reward—to explicitly encourage effective interaction with the database. Furthermore, ReEx-SQL adopts a tree-based decoding strategy to facilitate exploratory reasoning and primarily aims to enhance parallel decoding efficiency. Notably, ReEx-SQL achieves 89.1% accuracy on Spider and 65.3% on BIRD at the 7B scale, surpassing baseline models by 2.7% and 2.6%, respectively. In addition, its tree-based decoding accelerates inference by 51.9% compared to linear decoding during sampling.

Recent advances in large language models (LLMs) have led to substantial progress on the Text-to-SQL task. However, existing approaches typically depend on static, pre-processed database information supplied at inference time, which restricts the model’s capacity to deeply comprehend the underlying database content. In the absence of dynamic interaction, LLMs are limited to fixed, human-curated context and lack the ability to autonomously query or explore the data. To overcome this limitation, we introduce SDE-SQL, a novel framework that empowers LLMs to perform Self-Driven Exploration of databases during inference. This is achieved through the generation and execution of SQL probes, enabling the model to actively retrieve information and iteratively refine its understanding of the database. Unlike prior methods, SDE-SQL operates in a zero-shot setting, requiring no in-context demonstrations or question-SQL pairs. Evaluated on the BIRD benchmark with Qwen2.5-72B-Instruct, SDE-SQL achieves an 8.02 % relative improvement in execution accuracy over the vanilla Qwen2.5-72B-Instruct baseline, establishing a new state-of-the-art among open-source methods without supervised fine-tuning (SFT) or model ensembling. Furthermore, when combined with SFT, SDE-SQL delivers an additional 0.52 % performance gain.

Efficient instruction tuning aims to enhance the ultimate performance of large language models (LLMs) trained on a given instruction dataset. Curriculum learning as a typical data organization strategy has shown preliminary effectiveness in instruction tuning. However, current curriculum tuning methods suffer from the curriculum rigidity, since they rely solely on static heuristic difficulty metrics. These methods fail to adapt to the evolving capabilities of models during training, resulting in a fixed and potentially sub-optimal learning trajectory. To address the issue, Competence-Aware Multi-Perspective cUrriculum inStruction tuning framework termed CAMPUS is proposed. CAMPUS offers several advantages: (1) Dynamic selection for sub-curriculum. (2) Competency-aware adjustment to the curriculum schedule. (3) Multiple difficulty-based scheduling. Extensive experiments prove the superior performance of CAMPUS, compared to other state-of-the-art baselines for efficient instruction tuning.

Instruction tuning of large language models (LLMs) benefits more from a handful of high-quality examples than from hordes of low-quality ones. Existing selection methods typically rely on static, heuristic quality scores and are executed only once before training. Consequently, they neither adapt to the changing state of the model nor target downstream objectives, leaving substantial room for optimization. We propose RAISE (Reinforced Adaptive Instruction SElection), a dynamic, task-driven framework that integrates selection into every training step. At each step, RAISE estimates the expected contribution of each candidate instruction to task performance and admits only the most helpful. By modeling this process as sequential decision making, we optimize the selector with reinforcement learning, yielding an interpretable policy specialized for the target task. Extensive experiments show that RAISE reaches comparable or better results than full-data training while updating only 1% of the steps, demonstrating both high efficacy and significant computational savings.

Bridging the gap between visual and language remains a pivotal challenge for the multimodal community. Traditional VQA benchmarks encounter a modality gap and over-reliance on language priors, whereas human cognition excels at intuitive semiosis, associating abstract visual symbols to linguistic semantics. Inspired by this neurocognitive mechanism, we focus on emojis, the visual cipher conveying abstract textual semantics. Specifically, we propose a novel task of generating abstract linguistics from emoji sequence images, where such reasoning underpins critical applications in cryptography, thus challenging MLLMs’ reasoning of decoding complex semantics of visual ciphers. We introduce eWe-bench (Express What you SeE), assessing MLLMs’ capability of intuitive semiosis like humans. Our data construction framework ensures high visual sensitivity and data quality, which can be extended to future data enhancement. Evaluation results on advanced MLLMs highlight critical deficiencies in visual intuitive symbolic reasoning. We believe our interesting insights for advancing visual semiosis in MLLMs will pave the way for cryptographic analysis and high-level intuitive cognition intelligence of MLLMs.

Chinese Spelling Correction (CSC) aims to detect and correct spelling errors in given sentences. Recently, multi-domain CSC has gradually attracted the attention of researchers because it is more practicable. In this paper, we focus on the key flaw of the CSC model when adapting to multi-domain scenarios: the tendency to forget previously acquired knowledge upon learning new domain-specific knowledge (i.e., catastrophic forgetting). To address this, we propose a novel model-agnostic Multi-stage Knowledge Transfer (MKT) framework with an evolving teacher model and dynamic distillation weights for knowledge transfer in each domain, rather than focusing solely on new domain knowledge. It deserves to be mentioned that we are the first to apply continual learning methods to the multi-domain CSC task. Experiments prove our method’s effectiveness over traditional approaches, highlighting the importance of overcoming catastrophic forgetting to enhance model performance.

The paper focuses on the interpretability of Grammatical Error Correction (GEC) evaluation metrics, which received little attention in previous studies. To bridge the gap, we introduce CLEME2.0, a reference-based metric describing four fundamental aspects of GEC systems: hit-correction, wrong-correction, under-correction, and over-correction. They collectively contribute to exposing critical qualities and locating drawbacks of GEC systems. Evaluating systems by combining these aspects also leads to superior human consistency over other reference-based and reference-less metrics. Extensive experiments on two human judgment datasets and six reference datasets demonstrate the effectiveness and robustness of our method, achieving a new state-of-the-art result. Our codes are released at https://github.com/THUKElab/CLEME.

Recently, Large Language Models (LLMs) have been widely studied by researchers for their roles in various downstream NLP tasks. As a fundamental task in the NLP field, Chinese Grammatical Error Correction (CGEC) aims to correct all potential grammatical errors in the input sentences. Previous studies have shown that LLMs’ performance as correctors on CGEC remains unsatisfactory due to the challenging nature of the task. To promote the CGEC field to better adapt to the era of LLMs, we rethink the roles of LLMs in the CGEC task so that they can be better utilized and explored in CGEC. Considering the rich grammatical knowledge stored in LLMs and their powerful semantic understanding capabilities, we utilize LLMs as explainers to provide explanation information to the CGEC small models during error correction, aiming to enhance performance. We also use LLMs as evaluators to bring more reasonable CGEC evaluations, thus alleviating the troubles caused by the subjectivity of the CGEC task. In particular, our work is also an active exploration of how LLMs and small models better collaborate in downstream tasks. Extensive experiment and detailed analyses on widely used datasets verify the effectiveness of our intuition and the proposed methods.