Existing jailbreak classifiers for large language models (LLMs) often fail to distinguish truly harmful responses from benign paraphrases, resulting in high error rates. We reframe jailbreak detection as a strict instruction-following verification task rather than holistic semantic matching. To achieve this, we propose Sub-Query Decomposition (SQD), a framework that breaks complex adversarial prompts into atomic, actionable sub-intents. SQD transforms opaque safety assessment into a parameterizable adjudication protocol, allowing practitioners to quantitatively adjust safety boundaries via explicit mathematical aggregation rules for highly interpretable evaluation. To operationalize SQD at scale, we introduce three foundational pillars: (1) Efficient Deployment via distilled lightweight models, featuring SQD-Phi-4 for single-pass end-to-end verification and SQD-Decomposer, optimized with an entropy-aware loss to mathematically prevent the omission of rare constraints; (2) Evaluation Foundation through SQD-Bench, a rigorously human-annotated dataset; and (3) LLM-independent Judge via E(mbedding)-TFIDF to eliminate inference-time reasoning bias. Extensive experiments demonstrate that our unified framework provides a transparent, low-cost, and policy-aligned standard for reliable jailbreak evaluation.

LLM agents act on real-world environments through tool calls, and a single misjudged action can cause irreversible harm. The standard safeguard is a guard model that labels each proposed action as safe or unsafe, but this binary view conflates two distinct decisions: whether the action is harmful in itself, and whether it is appropriate given the user’s context. It also operates at the granularity of action categories rather than individual instances, producing routine interruptions that erode autonomy and train users to wave through the most consequential alerts. We reframe the problem as a per-instance three-way routing decision over Execute, Ask, Refuse and instantiate it with Safety Sentry, a lightweight guard model whose inference reduces to a single decoding call. A single decoding-time threshold lets one fixed checkpoint be re-positioned across deployments of differing risk tolerance without retraining. Safety Sentry outperforms a broad set of open-weight and frontier closed-source baselines on overall accuracy and safety-related recall, while controlling both directional error rates simultaneously.

Safety alignment is critical in pre-trained large language models (LLMs) to generate responses aligned with human values and refuse harmful queries. Unlike LLM, the current safety alignment of VLMs is often achieved with post-hoc safety fine-tuning. However, these methods are less effective to white-box attacks. To address this, we propose Adversary-aware DPO (ADPO), a novel training framework that explicitly considers adversary. Adversary-aware DPO (ADPO) integrates adversarial training into DPO to enhance the safety alignment of VLMs under worst-case adversarial perturbations. ADPO introduces two key components: (1) an adversarial-trained reference model that generates human-preferred responses under worst-case perturbations, and (2) an adversary-aware DPO loss that generates winner-loser pairs accounting for adversarial distortions. By combining these innovations, ADPO ensures that VLMs remain robust and reliable even in the presence of sophisticated jailbreak attacks. Extensive experiments demonstrate that ADPO outperforms baselines in terms of both safety alignment and general utility of VLMs.

Large Language Models (LLMs) are widely applied in decision making, but their deployment is threatened by jailbreak attacks, where adversarial users manipulate model behavior to bypass safety measures. Existing defense mechanisms, such as safety fine-tuning and model editing, either require extensive parameter modifications or lack precision, leading to performance degradation on general tasks, which is unsuitable to post-deployment safety alignment. To address these challenges, we propose DELMAN (Dynamic Editing for LLMs JAilbreak DefeNse), a novel approach leveraging direct model editing for precise, dynamic protection against jailbreak attacks. DELMAN directly updates a minimal set of relevant parameters to neutralize harmful behaviors while preserving the model’s utility. To avoid triggering a safe response in benign context, we incorporate KL-divergence regularization to ensure the updated model remains consistent with the original model when processing benign queries. Experimental results demonstrate that DELMAN outperforms baseline methods in mitigating jailbreak attacks while preserving the model’s utility, and adapts seamlessly to new attack instances, providing a practical and efficient solution for post-deployment model protection.

Ensuring the safety alignment of Large Language Models (LLMs) is critical for generating responses consistent with human values. However, LLMs remain vulnerable to jailbreaking attacks, where carefully crafted prompts manipulate them into producing toxic content. One category of such attacks reformulates the task as an optimization problem, aiming to elicit affirmative responses from the LLM. However, these methods heavily rely on predefined objectionable behaviors, limiting their effectiveness and adaptability to diverse harmful queries. In this study, we first identify why the vanilla target loss is suboptimal and then propose enhancements to the loss objective. We introduce DSN (Don’t Say No) attack, which combines a cosine decay schedule method with refusal suppression to achieve higher success rates. Extensive experiments demonstrate that DSN outperforms baseline attacks and achieves state-of-the-art attack success rates (ASR). DSN also shows strong universality and transferability to unseen datasets and black-box models.