Understanding whether one event increases or decreases the likelihood of another is critical for real-life applications. Unlike other relationships, promoting and inhibiting relationships capture directional, probabilistic, and context-dependent shifts in event likelihood. A central challenge is to estimate this relative influence from observational data: naive conditional probabilities conflate influence with correlation and are easily distorted by shared contextual confounders. We propose EPIR, a unified framework for estimating promoting and inhibiting relationships from observed event data. EPIR formulates influence as a relative directional effect under comparable contextual conditions, and models event context using : (i) observable history captured and (ii) latent multi-hop propagation mechanisms. EPIR combines context-conditioned predictive evidence with schema-based structural evidence to produce a single signed influence score, where the sign determines promotion versus inhibition. Experiments on real-world datasets show that EPIR outperforms state-of-the-art baselines in accuracy.

Large language models (LLMs) excel in natural language tasks, with Chain-of-Thought (CoT) prompting enhancing reasoning through step-by-step decomposition. However, CoT struggles in knowledge-intensive tasks with multiple entities and implicit multi-hop relations, failing to connect entities systematically in zero-shot settings. Existing knowledge graph methods, limited by static structures, lack adaptability in complex scenarios. We propose DS-MHP, a zero-shot framework to enhance LLM reasoning in multi-entity relation tasks. DS-MHP operates in three stages: 1) constructing query-specific subgraphs by extracting entities and relations; 2) generating and refining multi-hop paths using a hybrid strategy of Breadth-First Search, greedy expansion, and LLM supplementation; and 3) guiding LLMs with subgraphs and paths, aggregating answers via majority voting. Evaluated on 12 datasets spanning commonsense, logical, symbolic, and arithmetic reasoning, DS-MHP outperforms baselines and state-of-the-art methods in nearly all benchmarks. It achieves overall average accuracy increases of 3.9% on Mistral-7B and 3.6% on GPT-3.5 Turbo compared to SOTA, with significant gains in logical and symbolic reasoning. Additionally, DS-MHP reduces runtime and LLM calls compared to SOTA, enhancing computational efficiency. These improvements demonstrate DS-MHP’s superior reasoning accuracy, explainability, and efficiency in complex multi-entity tasks.

Personalized review summarization in recommender systems is a challenging task of generating condensed summaries for product reviews while preserving the salient content of reviews. Recently, Pretrained Language Models (PLMs) have become a new paradigm in text generation for the strong ability of natural language comprehension. However, it is nontrivial to apply PLMs in personalized review summarization directly since there are rich personalized information (e.g., user preferences and product characteristics) to be considered, which is crucial to the salience estimation of input review. In this paper, we propose a pre-trained personalized review summarization method, which aims to effectively incorporate the personalized information of users and products into the salience estimation of the input reviews. We design a personalized encoder that could identify the salient contents of the input sequence by jointly considering the semantic and personalized information respectively (i.e., ratings, user and product IDs, and linguistic features), yielding personalized representations for the input reviews and history summaries separately. Moreover, we design an interactive information selection mechanism that further identifies the salient contents of the input reviews and selects relative information from the history summaries. The results on real-world datasets show that our method performs better than the state-of-the-art baselines and could generate more readable summaries.