Large language models have recently demonstrated remarkable abilities to self-correct their responses through iterative refinement, often referred to as self-consistency or self-reflection. However, the dynamics of this self-correction mechanism may differ substantially depending on whether the model is tasked with open-ended text generation or with selecting the most appropriate response from multiple predefined options. In this paper, we conduct a systematic investigation of these two paradigms by comparing performance trends and error-correction behaviors across question answering tasks, covering language models of different scales and families. Our experimental results reveal distinct patterns of improvement and failure modes:

While open-ended generation often benefits from the flexibility of re-interpretation and compositional refinement, multiple-choice selection can leverage clearer solution boundaries but may be limited by the provided options. This contrast also reflects the dual demands faced by emerging agentic LLM applications: effective agents must not only generate and refine open-ended plans or explanations, but also make reliable discrete choices when operating within constrained action spaces. Our findings, therefore, highlight that the design of self-correction mechanisms should take into account the interaction between task structure and output space, with implications for both knowledge-intensive reasoning and decision-oriented applications of LLMs.

Pre-training Large Language Models (LLMs) from scratch at larger scales yields remarkable performance but incurs substantially high training costs. Depth up-scaling provides an efficient alternative by inserting new layers into a pre-trained LLM, avoiding training from scratch. However, most existing methods copying or averaging base layers for new layer, which misalign functionally corresponding neurons, leading to neuron permutation mismatch that harms performance. To address this issue, we propose Optimal Transport Depth Up-Scaling (OT-DUS), which leverages Optimal Transport (OT) theory to align and fuse functionally corresponding neurons module by module in adjacent base layers for new layer construction. OT-DUS achieves better overall performance in both general and specialized domains than existing methods for continual pre-training and supervised fine-tuning across different model sizes and model families. Our analysis of insertion strategies further finds that inserting new layers at higher positions yields not only stronger performance but also improved training efficiency.

Deduction, induction, and abduction are fundamental reasoning paradigms, core for human logical thinking. Although improving Large Language Model (LLM) reasoning has attracted significant research efforts, the extent to which the fundamental paradigms induce generalization has yet to be systematically explored. In this study, we shed light on how the interplay between these core paradigms influences LLMs’ reasoning behavior. To this end, we first collect a new dataset of reasoning trajectories from symbolic tasks, each targeting one of the three fundamental paradigms, to abstract from concrete world knowledge. Then, we investigate effective ways for inducing these skills into LLMs.We experiment with a battery of methods including simple fine-tuning, and more complex approaches to increase model depth, or transform a dense model to a mixture-of-experts. We comprehensively evaluate induced models on realistic out-of-domain tasks, that are entirely formulated in natural language and contain real-world knowledge. Our results reveal that our approach yields strong generalizability with substantial performance gains (up to 14.60) across realistic tasks.

While Large Language Models have significantly advanced Text2SQL generation, a critical semantic gap persists: syntactically valid queries can still misinterpret user intent. To mitigate this challenge, we propose GBV-SQL, a multi-agent framework that introduces Guided Generation with SQL2Text Back-translation Validation. In particular, a dedicated validator translates generated SQL back into natural language and checks whether its logic is aligned with the original question. Beyond the method itself, we also conduct a systematic audit of benchmark quality and introduce a typology of “Gold Errors” in Text2SQL datasets. Our analysis shows that benchmark issues can coexist with strong execution accuracy and can substantially affect evaluation outcomes. On the challenging BIRD benchmark, GBV-SQL achieves 63.23% execution accuracy, a 5.8% absolute improvement over the Deepseek-v3-based MAC-SQL setting. Under manually audited benchmark corrections, GBV-SQL reaches 96.5% (dev) and 97.6% (test) on Spider, and 90.42% on repaired BIRD dev, providing a diagnostic view of model behavior under improved gold quality. Our work contributes both a practical framework for semantic validation and an empirical analysis of benchmark integrity in Text2SQL evaluation.

Multi-Agent (MA) systems are effective at solving complex tasks that demand planning, tool use, and the synthesis of evidence from multiple sources. Existing systems typically adopt Hierarchical Manager-Worker (HMW) or Router-based Message Passing (RMP) structures as their communication protocol. However, these designs restrict agent autonomy: Worker agents cannot directly consult specific “peers”, and misrouted messages can propagate errors. Inspired by bus architectures in computer systems, we propose BusMA, a communication framework that allows any agent to address other agents through a shared channel, i.e., the Bus. It consists of agent registration, message routing, and shared memory management components. Worker agents, each equipped with tools, have their own local memory and can reason, act (tool usage), and communicate by posting shared messages with specific intents. We introduce four intents: discussion, challenge, guidance, and request for explanation, which support fine-grained communication among agents. A Chair agent monitors the shared memory to coordinate interactions and facilitate convergence among Workers. To evaluate the effectiveness of BusMA, we conduct extensive experiments with two frontier LLMs across 13 tasks spanning visual reasoning, mathematical reasoning, and knowledge retrieval. The results demonstrate that BusMA consistently outperforms state-of-the-art HMW and RMP methods.

Long-term memory is important for chatbots and dialogue systems (DS) to create consistent and human-like conversations, evidenced by numerous developed memory-augmented DS (MADS). To evaluate the effectiveness of such MADS, existing commonly used evaluation metrics, like retrieval accuracy and perplexity (PPL), mainly focus on query-oriented factualness and language quality assessment. However, these metrics often lack practical value. Moreover, the evaluation dimensions are insufficient for human-like assessment in DS. Regarding memory-recalling paradigms, current evaluation schemes only consider passive memory retrieval while ignoring diverse memory recall with rich triggering factors, e.g., emotions and surroundings, which can be essential in emotional support scenarios. To bridge the gap, we construct a novel Memory-Augmented Dialogue Benchmark (MADail-Bench) covering various memory-recalling paradigms based on cognitive science and psychology theories. The benchmark assesses two tasks separately: memory retrieval and memory recognition with the incorporation of both passive and proactive memory recall data. We introduce new scoring criteria to the evaluation, including memory injection, emotion support (ES) proficiency, and intimacy, to comprehensively assess generated responses. Results from cutting-edge embedding models and large language models on this benchmark indicate the potential for further advancement. Extensive testing further reveals correlations between memory injection, ES proficiency, and intimacy.

With the success of integrating large language models into the development of conversational systems, many studies have shown the effectiveness of retrieving and augmenting external knowledge for informative responses. While many existing studies agree on the necessity of Retrieval Augmented Generation (RAG), further investigation into the necessity and value of applying RAG to every turn of the conversation is needed. In this study, we propose to investigate the need for each turn of system response to be augmented with external knowledge. In particular, by leveraging human judgements on the binary choice of adaptive augmentation, we develop RAGate, a gating model, which models conversation context and relevant inputs to predict if a conversational system requires RAG for improved responses. We conduct extensive experiments on devising and applying RAGate to conversational models, joined with well-rounded analyses of various conversational scenarios. Our experimental results and analysis indicate the effective application of RAGate in RAG-based conversational systems in identifying if system responses require RAG to generate high-quality responses with high confidence. This study also identifies and shows the correlation between the generation’s confidence level and the relevance of the augmented knowledge. We have also released the implementation code and resources in https://github.com/wangxieric/RAGate.

Clarifying questions are an integral component of modern information retrieval systems, directly impacting user satisfaction and overall system performance. Poorly formulated questions can lead to user frustration and confusion, negatively affecting the system’s performance. This research addresses the urgent need to identify and leverage key features that contribute to the classification of clarifying questions, enhancing user satisfaction. To gain deeper insights into how different features influence user satisfaction, we conduct a comprehensive analysis, considering a broad spectrum of lexical, semantic, and statistical features, such as question length and sentiment polarity. Our empirical results provide three main insights into the qualities of effective query clarification: (1) specific questions are more effective than generic ones; (2) the subjectivity and emotional tone of a question play a role; and (3) shorter and more ambiguous queries benefit significantly from clarification. Based on these insights, we implement feature-integrated user satisfaction prediction using various classifiers, both traditional and neural-based, including random forest, BERT, and large language models. Our experiments show a consistent and significant improvement, particularly in traditional classifiers, with a minimum performance boost of 45%. This study presents invaluable guidelines for refining the formulation of clarifying questions and enhancing both user satisfaction and system performance.

The ability to understand a user’s underlying needs is critical for conversational systems, especially with limited input from users in a conversation. Thus, in such a domain, Asking Clarification Questions (ACQs) to reveal users’ true intent from their queries or utterances arise as an essential task. However, it is noticeable that a key limitation of the existing ACQs studies is their incomparability, from inconsistent use of data, distinct experimental setups and evaluation strategies. Therefore, in this paper, to assist the development of ACQs techniques, we comprehensively analyse the current ACQs research status, which offers a detailed comparison of publicly available datasets, and discusses the applied evaluation metrics, joined with benchmarks for multiple ACQs-related tasks. In particular, given a thorough analysis of the ACQs task, we discuss a number of corresponding research directions for the investigation of ACQs as well as the development of conversational systems.