While Supervised Fine-Tuning (SFT) is the prevailing method for equipping Large Language Models (LLMs) with function calling capabilities, its effectiveness is often compromised by two critical challenges: 1) Imbalanced Training Signals, where lengthy Chain-of-Thought (CoT) reasoning tokens dominate the training signals over concise function calls in the learning objective, and 2) Imbalanced Data Hardness, characterized by a scarcity of hard training examples. To overcome these limitations, we propose Balanced Supervised Fine-tuning (BalanceSFT), a novel framework that incorporates two key components: a Self-adjusted Signal Balancing (SSB) loss that employs a learnable hyperparameter to dynamically adjust the token contributions of CoT reasoning and function calls, together with a Hard Data Re-sampling (HDR) strategy that establishes a feedback loop to selectively generate new, high-quality complex data guided by model errors. Extensive experiments demonstrate the effectiveness of our proposed BalanceSFT framework. With BalanceSFT, a 7B model achieves function calling performance that surpasses state-of-the-art models like GPT-5. Our code, models, and dataset are open-sourced.

Despite substantial advancements in aligning LLMs with human values, current safety mechanisms remain susceptible to jailbreak attacks. We attribute this vulnerability to the distributional discrepancies between alignment-oriented prompts and malicious prompts. To investigate this, and drawing inspiration from logic-driven NLP tasks, we introduce LogiBreak, a universal black-box jailbreak method that utilizes logical expression translation to bypass LLM safety mechanisms. By converting harmful natural language prompts into formal logical expressions, LogiBreak exploits the distributional gap between alignment data and logic-expressed inputs, preserving the underlying semantic intent and readability while evading safety constraints. Furthermore, to fill the gap of existing benchmarks that lack systematic resources specifically targeting logical expression-based attacks against LLM robustness, we construct a novel multilingual logical expression jailbreak dataset for evaluation. Our evaluations of LogiBreak in five languages demonstrate its effectiveness and generalizability in various linguistic contexts. The code is available at https://github.com/Applied-Machine-Learning-Lab/ACL2026_Logibreak.

Recent advancements in large language models (LLMs) have catalyzed the rise of reasoningintensive inference paradigms, where models perform explicit step-by-step reasoning before generating final answers. While such approaches improve answer quality and interpretability, they incur substantial computational overhead due to the prolonged generation sequences. In this paper, we propose Tandem, a novel collaborative framework that synergizes large and small language models (LLMs and SLMs) to achieve high-quality reasoning with significantly reduced computational cost. Specifically, the LLM serves as a strategic coordinator, efficiently generating a compact set of critical reasoning insights. These insights are then used to guide a smaller, more efficient SLM in executing the full reasoning process and delivering the final response. To balance efficiency and reliability, Tandem introduces a cost-aware termination mechanism that adaptively determines when sufficient reasoning guidance has been accumulated, enabling early stopping of the LLM’s generation. Experiments on mathematical reasoning and code generation benchmarks demonstrate that Tandem reduces computational costs by approximately 40% compared to standalone LLM reasoning, while achieving superior or competitive performance. Furthermore, the sufficiency classifier trained on one domain transfers effectively to others without retraining. The code is available at: https://github.com/Applied-MachineLearning-Lab/ACL2026_Tandem.

Multi-hop Question Answering (MHQA) aims to answer questions that require multi-step reasoning. The complexity of user queries, coupled with potential knowledge deficiencies in Large Language Models (LLMs), gives rise to two pivotal challenges that underpin the performance on this task: the correct identification of the reasoning path and the accurate retrieval of essential knowledge. Existing approaches primarily rely on prompt-based methods to generate reasoning paths, which are further combined with traditional sparse or dense retrieval to produce the final answer. However, the generation of reasoning paths commonly lacks effective control over the generative process, thus leading the reasoning astray. Meanwhile, the retrieval methods over-rely on knowledge matching or similarity scores rather than evaluating the practical utility of the information, resulting in retrieving homogeneous or non-useful information. Therefore, we propose a Structured Entity-Aware Retrieval with Chain-of-Reasoning Navigator framework named SEARCH-R. Specifically, SEARCH-R trains an end-to-end reasoning path navigator, which is able to provide a powerful sub-question decomposer by fine-tuning the Llama3.1-8B model. Moreover, a novel dependency tree-based retrieval is designed to evaluate the informational contribution of the document quantitatively. Extensive experiments on three challenging multi-hop datasets validate the effectiveness of the proposed framework. The code and dataset are available at: https://github.com/Applied-Machine-Learning-Lab/ACL2026_SEARCH-R.

Diagnostic prediction and clinical reasoning are critical tasks in healthcare applications. While large language models have shown strong capabilities in commonsense reasoning, they still struggle with diagnostic reasoning due to limited domain knowledge. Existing approaches often rely on internal model knowledge or static knowledge bases, which are insufficient to support the knowledge demands of diagnostic reasoning. Moreover, these methods focus solely on the accuracy of final predictions, overlooking alignment with standard clinical reasoning trajectories. To this end, we propose MultiDx, a two-stage diagnostic reasoning framework that performs differential diagnosis by analyzing evidence collected from multiple knowledge sources. Specifically, it first generates suspected diagnoses and reasoning traces by leveraging knowledge from web search, SOAP-formatted case, and clinical case database. Then it integrates multi-perspective evidence through matching, voting, and differential diagnosis to generate the final prediction. Extensive experiments demonstrate the effectiveness of our approach.

Large language models have demonstrated strong reasoning capabilities in general knowledge question answering. However, their ability to handle temporal information remains limited. To address this limitation, existing approaches often design time-sensitive reasoning pipelines that rely on external tools or manual verification and are tailored to specific scenarios, leading to poor generalizability. Moreover, these methods apply a fixed pipeline to all questions, overlooking the fact that different types of temporal questions often require distinct reasoning strategies, which leads to unnecessary processing for simple cases and inadequate reasoning for more complex ones. To this end, we propose AdapTime, an adaptive temporal reasoning method that dynamically executes reasoning steps based on the input context and task requirements. Specifically, it involves three temporal reasoning actions: reformulate, rewrite and review, with an LLM planner guiding the reasoning process. AdapTime integrates seamlessly with state-of-the-art LLMs and significantly enhances their temporal reasoning capabilities without relying on external support. Extensive experiments on two temporal QA benchmarks demonstrate the effectiveness of our approach.

With the widespread deployment of large language models (LLMs), existing safety benchmarks remain largely focused on explicitly harmful content, overlooking context-dependent expressions such as dogwhistles, the language that conveys harmful intent while appearing benign on the surface. To address this gap, we introduce DogBench, a comprehensive benchmark for evaluating LLM safety under dogwhistle-driven prompts. DogBench comprises 11,150 prompt instances constructed from controlled templates that embed dogwhistle terms, allowing for enabling direct comparison with explicit toxic terms under identical prompt structures. Each prompt is further annotated with pragmatic attributes, including interaction category and stance tendency. Extensive evaluations across multiple mainstream LLMs reveal a consistent pattern: dogwhistle prompts are substantially more likely to elicit harmful outputs than their explicit toxic counterparts, with an average risk increase of approximately fourfold. These findings expose a blind spot in current safety evaluation and alignment practices. Our work underscores the need to explicitly incorporate dogwhistles into future LLM safety research, with DogBench serving as a dedicated benchmark for this purpose.

Geographic reasoning is a fundamental cognitive capability that requires models to infer plausible locations by synthesizing visual evidence with spatial world knowledge. Despite recent advances in large vision-language models (LVLMs), existing evaluation paradigms remain largely outcome-centric, relying on static datasets and predefined labels that are conceptually misaligned with open-world geographic inference. Such outcome-centric evaluations often focus exclusively on label matching, leaving the underlying linguistic reasoning chains as unexamined black boxes. In this work, we introduce GeoArena, a dynamic, human-preference-based evaluation framework for benchmarking open-world geographic reasoning. GeoArena reframes evaluation as a pairwise reasoning alignment task on in-the-wild images, where human judges compare model-generated explanations based on reasoning quality, evidence synthesis, and plausibility. We deploy GeoArena as a public platform and benchmark 17 frontier LVLMs using thousands of human judgments, which complements existing benchmarks and supports the development of geographically grounded, human-aligned AI systems. We further provide detailed analyses of model behavior, including reliability of human preferences and factors influencing judgments of geographic reasoning quality. We open-source GeoArena to foster future research.

The post-training stage of Large Language Models (LLMs) typically involves Supervised Fine-Tuning (SFT) followed by preference alignment to ensure LLM to generate safe, helpful, and instruction-aligned content. The SFT model critically serves as both the initialization and reference model for subsequent preference alignment. However, an essential yet often neglected question is the optimal selection of the SFT checkpoint for this role. We show that checkpoint selection substantially affects final performance, and that the common practice of choosing the minimum validation-loss checkpoint often fails, due to a fundamental conflict between SFT’s focus on imitation and alignment’s goal of response discriminability. To this end, we propose RewardRank, a simple, effective, training-free metrics for estimating initial implicit alignment between reference model and preference objective. Empirical evidence suggests that, using our selected model as reference can gain up to 67.6% relative increase on length-controlled win rate on the popular Zephyr recipe comparing to baselines.

Recent advances in large language models (LLMs) have scaled the potential for reasoning and agentic search, wherein models autonomously plan, retrieve, and reason over external knowledge to answer complex queries. However, the iterative think–search loop accumulates long system memories, leading to memory dilution problem. In addition, existing memory management methods struggle to capture fine-grained semantic relations between queries and documents and often lose substantial information. Therefore, we propose MemSearch-o1, an agentic search framework built on reasoning-aligned memory growth and retracing. MemSearch-o1 dynamically grows fine-grained memory fragments from memory seed tokens from the queries, then retraces and deeply refines the memory via a contribution function, and finally reorganizes a globally connected memory path. This shifts memory management from stream-like concatenation to structured, token-level growth with path-based reasoning. Experiments on eight benchmark datasets show that MemSearch-o1 substantially mitigates memory dilution, and more effectively activates the reasoning potential of diverse LLMs, establishing a solid foundation for memory-aware agentic intelligence.

Large language model (LLM) agents require long-term user memory for consistent personalization, but limited context windows hinder tracking evolving preferences over long interactions. Existing memory systems mainly rely on static, hand-crafted update rules; although reinforcement learning (RL)-based agents learn memory updates, sparse outcome rewards provide weak supervision, resulting in unstable long-horizon optimization. Drawing on memory schema theory and the functional division between prefrontal regions and hippocampus regions, we introduce MemCoE, a cognition-inspired two-stage optimization framework that learns how memory should be organized and what information to update. In the first stage, we propose Memory Guideline Induction to optimize a global guideline via contrastive feedback interpreted as textual gradients; in the second stage, Guideline-Aligned Memory Policy Optimization uses the induced guideline to define structured process rewards and performs multi-turn RL to learn a guideline-following memory evolution policy. We evaluate on three personalization memory benchmarks, covering explicit and implicit preferences as well as different sizes and noise levels, and observe consistent improvements over strong baselines with favorable robustness, transferability, and efficiency[https://github.com/Applied-Machine-Learning-Lab/ACL2026_MemCoE].

Personalized Large Language Models (PLLMs) aim to align model outputs with individual user preferences, a crucial capability for user-centric applications. However, the prevalent approach of fine-tuning a separate module for each user faces two major limitations: (1) storage costs scale linearly with the number of users, rendering the method unscalable; and (2) fine-tuning a static model from scratch often yields suboptimal performance for users with sparse data. To address these challenges, we propose MTA, a Merge-then-Adapt framework for PLLMs. MTA comprises three key stages. First, we construct a shared Meta-LoRA Bank by selecting anchor users and pre-training meta-personalization traits within meta-LoRA modules. Second, to ensure scalability and enable dynamic personalization combination beyond static models, we introduce an Adaptive LoRA Fusion stage. This stage retrieves and dynamically merges the most relevant anchor meta-LoRAs to synthesize a user-specific one, thereby eliminating the need for user-specific storage and supporting more flexible personalization. Third, we propose a LoRA Stacking for Few-Shot Personalization stage, which applies an additional ultra-low-rank, lightweight LoRA module on top of the merged LoRA. Fine-tuning this module enables effective personalization under few-shot settings. Extensive experiments on the LaMP benchmark demonstrate that our approach outperforms existing SOTA methods across multiple tasks. Our code is also available.

In recent times, there has been a shift towards adapting sequential recommendation to LLM paradigm to harness the capabilities of LLMs. These methods typically formulate recommendation data into natural language and train the model to forecast the subsequent item in an auto-regressive manner. Despite their notable success, the significant computational burden during inference poses a major challenge to their practical implementation. In this study, we aim to streamline current LLM-based recommendation models and introduce a straightforward yet highly effective model Lite-LLM4Rec. The primary objective of Lite-LLM4Rec is to ensure efficient inference for the sequential recommendation task. Lite-LLM4Rec circumvents the step-by-step beam search decoding by employing a direct item projection head to produce ranking scores in one step. This design arises from our empirical finding that beam search decoding is ultimately unnecessary for sequential recommendations. Additionally, Lite-LLM4Rec introduces a hierarchical LLM structure crafted to efficiently handle the extensive contextual information of items and redundant computation issue, thus diminishing computational overhead while enjoying the power of LLMs. Experiments on four publicly available datasets validate the efficacy of Lite-LLM4Rec in enhancing both performance and inference efficiency (notably 46.8% performance improvement and 99.48% efficiency improvement on ML-1m) compared to existing LLM-based methods. Our implementations are available at: https://github.com/HanbingWang2001/Lite-LLM4Rec-PyTorch.

The reranker and generator are two critical components in the Retrieval-Augmented Generation (i.e., RAG) pipeline, responsible for ranking relevant documents and generating responses. However, due to differences in pre-training data and objectives, there is an inevitable gap between the documents ranked as relevant by the reranker and those required by the generator to support answering the query. To address this gap, we propose RADIO, a novel and practical preference alignment framework with RAtionale DIstillatiOn. Specifically, We first propose a rationale extraction method that leverages the reasoning capabilities of large language models (LLMs) to extract the rationales necessary for answering the query. Subsequently, a rationale-based alignment process is designed to rerank the documents based on the extracted rationales, and fine-tune the reranker to align the preferences. We conduct extensive experiments on two tasks across three datasets to demonstrate the effectiveness of our approach compared to baseline methods. Our code is released online to ease reproduction.

Temporal knowledge graph reasoning aims to predict future events with knowledge of existing facts and plays a key role in various downstream tasks. Previous methods focused on either graph structure learning or semantic reasoning, failing to integrate dual reasoning perspectives to handle different prediction scenarios. Moreover, they lack the capability to capture the inherent differences between historical and non-historical events, which limits their generalization across different temporal contexts. To this end, we propose a Multi-Expert Structural-Semantic Hybrid (MESH) framework that employs three kinds of expert modules to integrate both structural and semantic information, guiding the reasoning process for different events. Extensive experiments on three datasets demonstrate the effectiveness of our approach.

Large Language Models (LLMs) are increasingly integrated into our daily lives, raising significant ethical concerns, especially about perpetuating stereotypes.While group-specific debiasing methods have made progress, they often fail to address multiple biases simultaneously. In contrast, group-agnostic debiasing has the potential to mitigate a variety of biases at once, but remains underexplored.In this work, we investigate the role of neutral words—the group-agnostic component—in enhancing the group-agnostic debiasing process. We first reveal that neutral words are essential for preserving semantic modeling, and we propose 𝜖-DPCE, a method that incorporates a neutral word semantics-based loss function to effectively alleviate the deterioration of the Language Modeling Score (LMS) during the debiasing process. Furthermore, by introducing the SCM-Projection method, we demonstrate that SCM-based debiasing eliminates stereotypes by indirectly disrupting the association between attribute and neutral words in the Stereotype Content Model (SCM) space. Our experiments show that neutral words, which often embed multi-group stereotypical objects, play a key role in contributing to the group-agnostic nature of SCM-based debiasing.

Large language models (LLMs) have made remarkable strides in complex reasoning tasks, but their safety and robustness in reasoning processes remain unexplored, particularly in third-party platforms that facilitate user interactions via APIs. Existing attacks on LLM reasoning are constrained by specific settings or lack of imperceptibility, limiting their feasibility and generalizability. To address these challenges, we propose the Stepwise rEasoning Error Disruption (SEED) attack, which subtly injects errors into prior reasoning steps to mislead the model into producing incorrect subsequent reasoning and final answers. Unlike previous methods, SEED is compatible with zero-shot and few-shot settings, maintains the natural reasoning flow, and ensures covert execution without modifying the instruction. Extensive experiments on four datasets across four different models demonstrate SEED’s effectiveness, revealing the vulnerabilities of LLMs to disruptions in reasoning processes. These findings underscore the need for greater attention to the robustness of LLM reasoning to ensure safety in practical applications. Our code is available at: https://github.com/Applied-Machine-Learning-Lab/SEED-Attack

Large Language Models (LLMs) have demonstrated exceptional capabilities across diverse natural language processing (NLP) tasks. The release of open-source LLMs like LLaMA and Qwen has triggered the development of numerous fine-tuned models tailored for various tasks and languages. In this paper, we explore an important question: is it possible to combine these specialized models to create a unified model with multi-task capabilities. We introduces Hierarchical Iterative Merging (Hi-Merging), a training-free method for unifying different specialized LLMs into a single model. Specifically, Hi-Merging employs model-wise and layer-wise pruning and scaling, guided by contribution analysis, to mitigate parameter conflicts. Extensive experiments on multiple-choice and question-answering tasks in both Chinese and English validate Hi-Merging’s ability for multi-task learning. The results demonstrate that Hi-Merging consistently outperforms existing merging techniques and surpasses the performance of models fine-tuned on combined datasets in most scenarios. Code is available at Applied-Machine-Learning-Lab/Hi-Merging.

Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) has been proven to be an effective approach to address the hallucination problem in large language models (LLMs). In current RAG systems, LLMs typically need to synthesize knowledge provided by two main external sources (user prompts and an external database) to generate a final answer. When the knowledge provided by the user conflicts with that retrieved from the database, a critical question arises: Does the LLM favor one knowledge source over the other when generating the answer? In this paper, we are the first to unveil a new phenomenon, Authority Bias, where the LLMs tend to favor the knowledge provided by the user even when it deviates from the facts; this new phenomenon is rigorously evidenced via our novel and comprehensive characterization of Authority Bias in six widely used LLMs and across diverse task scenarios. We propose a novel dataset specifically designed for detecting Authority Bias, called the Authority Bias Detection Dataset (ABDD), and introduce new, detailed metrics to measure Authority Bias. To mitigate Authority bias, we finally propose the Conflict Detection Enhanced Query (CDEQ) framework. We identify the sentences and atomic information that generate conflicts, perform a credibility assessment on the conflicting paragraphs, and ultimately enhance the query to detect perturbed text, thereby reducing Authority bias. Comparative experiments with widely used mitigation methods demonstrate that CDEQ exhibits both effectiveness and advancement, significantly enhancing the robustness of RAG systems.

Large Language Models (LLMs) require continuous updates to maintain accurate and current knowledge as the world evolves. While existing knowledge editing approaches offer various solutions for knowledge updating, they often struggle with sequential editing scenarios and harm the general capabilities of the model, thereby significantly hampering their practical applicability.This paper proposes a two-stage framework combining robust supervised fine-tuning (R-SFT) with model merging for knowledge editing. Our method first fine-tunes the LLM to internalize new knowledge fully, then merges the fine-tuned model with the original foundation model to preserve newly acquired knowledge and general capabilities. Experimental results demonstrate that our approach significantly outperforms existing methods in sequential editing while better preserving the original performance of the model, all without requiring any architectural changes. Code is available at Applied-Machine-Learning-Lab/MM4KE.

Audiobook interpretations are attracting increasing attention, as they provide accessible and in-depth analyses of books that offer readers practical insights and intellectual inspiration. However, their manual creation process remains time-consuming and resource-intensive. To address this challenge, we propose AI4Reading, a multi-agent collaboration system leveraging large language models (LLMs) and speech synthesis technology to generate podcast-like audiobook interpretations. The system is designed to meet three key objectives: accurate content preservation, enhanced comprehensibility, and a logical narrative structure. To achieve these goals, We develop a framework composed of 11 specialized agents—including topic analysts, case analysts, editors, a narrator, and proofreaders—that work in concert to explore themes, extract real-world cases, refine content organization, and synthesize natural spoken language. By comparing expert interpretations with our system’s output, the results show that although AI4Reading still has a gap in speech generation quality, the generated interpretative scripts are simpler and more accurate. The code of AI4Reading is publicly accessible , with a demonstration video available .

The impressive capabilities of large language models (LLMs) have attracted extensive interests of applying LLMs to medical field. However, the complex nature of clinical environments presents significant hallucination challenges for LLMs, hindering their widespread adoption. In this paper, we address these hallucination issues in the context of Medical Information Extraction (MIE) tasks by introducing ALternate Contrastive Decoding (ALCD). We begin by redefining MIE tasks as an identify-and-classify process. We then separate the identification and classification functions of LLMs by selectively masking the optimization of tokens during fine-tuning. During the inference stage, we alternately contrast output distributions derived from sub-task models. This approach aims to selectively enhance the identification and classification capabilities while minimizing the influence of other inherent abilities in LLMs. Additionally, we propose an alternate adaptive constraint strategy to more effectively adjust the scale and scope of contrastive tokens. Through comprehensive experiments on two different backbones and six diverse medical information extraction tasks, ALCD demonstrates significant improvements in resolving hallucination issues compared to conventional decoding methods.