Existing Text-to-Image (T2I) benchmarks remain anchored in foundational criteria such as image quality and text-image alignment, failing to capture the nuanced capabilities that professional creators demand in real-world workflows. Meanwhile, evaluation pipelines that rely on an untrained multimodal model as a judge diverge from human standards. We introduce Qwen-Image-Bench, a creator-centric benchmark that extends evaluation with two application-driven dimensions (Real-world Fidelity and Creative Generation), alongside the conventional pillars of Quality, Aesthetics, and Alignment. The benchmark organizes these into a three-level taxonomy (5 pillars, 23 sub-capabilities, 56 verifiable rubrics) and provides 1000 stratified bilingual prompts. We train a unified Judge Model (Q-Judger) on Qwen3.6-27B, supervised by 80 professional annotators under blind labeling and triple-review protocols, that scores every image across all 56 facets with fine-grained, rubric-grounded diagnostics. Empirically, Qwen-Image-Bench reliably distinguishes leading T2I models, achieving the greatest separation on the application-driven dimensions where existing benchmarks provide limited insight.

Artificial Intelligence (AI), along with the recent progress in biomedical language understanding, is gradually offering great promise for medical practice. With the development of biomedical language understanding benchmarks, AI applications are widely used in the medical field. However, most benchmarks are limited to English, which makes it challenging to replicate many of the successes in English for other languages. To facilitate research in this direction, we collect real-world biomedical data and present the first Chinese Biomedical Language Understanding Evaluation (CBLUE) benchmark: a collection of natural language understanding tasks including named entity recognition, information extraction, clinical diagnosis normalization, single-sentence/sentence-pair classification, and an associated online platform for model evaluation, comparison, and analysis. To establish evaluation on these tasks, we report empirical results with the current 11 pre-trained Chinese models, and experimental results show that state-of-the-art neural models perform by far worse than the human ceiling.