LLM-based annotation has advanced rapidly, yet existing benchmarks remain misaligned with real-world practice. Actual annotation often involves lengthy, task-specific guidelines, and different annotators may produce divergent but reasonable judgments, especially on boundary cases, where single-labeled dataset fail to reflect this disagreement. This gap also limits existing single-agent and workflow-based annotation systems, which often lack adaptability to complex, evolving guidelines. To bridge this gap, we introduce ANT-A Benchmark, a real-world multi-annotator benchmark spanning 7 datasets across domains and modalities, with task-specific guidelines and 5 independent human labels per instance. ANT-A enables a distribution-aware evaluation, using Fleiss’ 𝜅 to assess how closely model annotations align with human labeling distributions. We further propose ANT-OR, a multi-agent annotation framework that refines prompts by distilling contrastive decision rules from positive and negative feedback. Experiments show that ANT-OR improves agreement@≥2 accuracy by 4.5 points over the strongest baseline and achieves the highest alignment with human annotator distributions as measured by Fleiss’ 𝜅 within 2 points. Code and benchmark are available at https://github.com/Krueske/ANT-OR.

Recent advances in Large Language Models (LLMs) have significantly enhanced their capabilities, highlighting the need for comprehensive evaluation frameworks that extend beyond task-specific benchmarks.However, existing benchmarks often focus on isolated abilities, lacking a holistic framework for assessing LLM capabilities.To address this gap, we propose the Cognition-Domain-Task (CDT) framework, which comprehensively measures a model’s capabilities across three dimensions.We expand the scope of model capability definitions at the cognitive level by incorporating the Cattell-Horn-Carroll cognitive theory, refining the categorization of model capabilities.We apply CDT in two directions: dataset capability evaluation and data selection. Experiments show that our capability metrics correlate well with downstream performance and can support effective dataset analysis and construction. The experiments on data selection also show significant improvements in both general and specific benchmarks, achieving scores of 44.3 and 45.4, with an increase of 1.6 and 2.2 points over the baselines, respectively. These results validate the effectiveness and practicality of CDT. Source code and models are available at https://github.com/Alessa-mo/CDT.