Xuan He
Author directory2026
VGI-Bench: Probing Visual Intelligence in Video Generation Models
Xuan He | Cong Wei | Yuhao Cheng | Linrui Ma | Yuxuan Zhang | Zuojun Li | Yuhao Wen | Jize Jiang | Zeyi Liu | Yuren Hao | Songcheng Cai | Keming Wu | Penghui Du | Kai Zou | Rui Yang | Chenkai Sun | Ke Yang | Ping Nie | Kelsey R Allen | Chenglong Wang | Michel Galley | Jianfeng Gao | ChengXiang Zhai
Proceedings of the 2026 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing
Xuan He | Cong Wei | Yuhao Cheng | Linrui Ma | Yuxuan Zhang | Zuojun Li | Yuhao Wen | Jize Jiang | Zeyi Liu | Yuren Hao | Songcheng Cai | Keming Wu | Penghui Du | Kai Zou | Rui Yang | Chenkai Sun | Ke Yang | Ping Nie | Kelsey R Allen | Chenglong Wang | Michel Galley | Jianfeng Gao | ChengXiang Zhai
Proceedings of the 2026 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing
Recent studies suggest that video generative models can exhibit certain forms of zero-shot visual reasoning through generated frames. Yet reliable evaluation remains challenging: benchmarks should adopt inputs aligned with the visual priors of current video models, require valid evolving processes rather than only plausible final states, and calibrate task difficulty to remain challenging yet partly feasible. To this end, we introduce VGI-Bench, containing 27 tasks and 810 instances, organized by a two-level taxonomy of domains and skill tags for evaluating the visual reasoning capabilities of video generative models. Our evaluations show that current generative systems can solve a subset of visually grounded reasoning tasks, but remain far from reliable, with even the strongest model, Seedance 2.0, achieving only 51.0% under our evaluation criteria. Our findings further reveal the input sensitivity, skill-bounded transfer from synthetic fine-tuning, and limited denoising-time self-correction, where later steps mainly refine early hypotheses rather than correct reasoning errors. We hope VGI-Bench will help stimulate the development of next-generation video generative models. Data and code are available at [our project page](https://hexuan21.github.io/VGI-Bench/).
2025
Guiding Through Complexity: What Makes Good Supervision for Hard Reasoning Tasks?
Xuan He | Da Yin | Nanyun Peng
Proceedings of the 2025 Conference of the Nations of the Americas Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies (Volume 1: Long Papers)
Xuan He | Da Yin | Nanyun Peng
Proceedings of the 2025 Conference of the Nations of the Americas Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies (Volume 1: Long Papers)
How can “weak teacher models” (Bowman et al., 2022) such as average human annotators or existing AI systems, effectively supervise LLMs to improve performance on hard reasoning tasks, especially those that challenge and requires expertise or daily practice from the teacher models? In this paper, we seek for empirical answers to this question by investigating various data-driven strategies that offer supervision data at different quality levels upon tasks of varying complexity. Two intuitive strategies emerge for teacher models to provide supervision during alignment training: 1) using lower-quality supervision from complete tasks that match the difficulty of the target reasoning tasks, and 2) leveraging higher-quality supervision from easier subtasks that are less challenging. Interestingly, we find that even when the outcome error rate for hard task supervision is high (e.g., 90%), training on such data can outperform perfectly correct supervision on easier subtasks on multiple hard math benchmarks. We further identify a more critical factor influencing training performance: step-wise error rates, which indicate the severity of errors in solutions. Specifically, training on hard task supervision with the same outcome error rates but disparate step-wise error rates can lead to a 30% accuracy gap on MATH benchmark. Our results also reveal that supplementing hard task supervision with the corresponding subtask supervision can yield notable performance improvements than simply combining rephrased hard full task supervision, suggesting new avenues for data augmentation. Data and code will be released upon acceptance.
2024
VideoScore: Building Automatic Metrics to Simulate Fine-grained Human Feedback for Video Generation
Xuan He | Dongfu Jiang | Ge Zhang | Max Ku | Achint Soni | Sherman Siu | Haonan Chen | Abhranil Chandra | Ziyan Jiang | Aaran Arulraj | Kai Wang | Quy Duc Do | Yuansheng Ni | Bohan Lyu | Yaswanth Narsupalli | Rongqi Fan | Zhiheng Lyu | Bill Yuchen Lin | Wenhu Chen
Proceedings of the 2024 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing
Xuan He | Dongfu Jiang | Ge Zhang | Max Ku | Achint Soni | Sherman Siu | Haonan Chen | Abhranil Chandra | Ziyan Jiang | Aaran Arulraj | Kai Wang | Quy Duc Do | Yuansheng Ni | Bohan Lyu | Yaswanth Narsupalli | Rongqi Fan | Zhiheng Lyu | Bill Yuchen Lin | Wenhu Chen
Proceedings of the 2024 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing
The recent years have witnessed great advances in video generation. However, the development of automatic video metrics is lagging significantly behind. None of the existing metric is able to provide reliable scores over generated videos. The main barrier is the lack of large-scale human-annotated dataset. In this paper, we release VideoFeedback, the first large-scale dataset containing human-provided multi-aspect score over 37.6K synthesized videos from 11 existing video generative models. We train VideoScore (initialized from Mantis)based on VideoFeedback to enable automatic video quality assessment. Experiments show that the Spearman’s correlation betweenVideoScore and humans can reach 77.1 on VideoFeedback-test, beating the prior best metrics by about 50 points. Further result onother held-out EvalCrafter, GenAI-Bench, and VBench show that VideoScore has consistently much higher correlation with humanjudges than other metrics. Due to these results, we believe VideoScore can serve as a great proxy for human raters to (1) rate different video models to track progress (2) simulate fine-grained human feedback in Reinforcement Learning with Human Feedback (RLHF) to improve current video generation models.
Search
Fix author
Co-authors
- Kelsey R Allen 1
- Aaran Arulraj 1
- Songcheng Cai 1
- Abhranil Chandra 1
- Haonan Chen 1
- Wenhu Chen 1
- Yuhao Cheng 1
- Quy Duc Do 1
- Penghui Du 1
- Rongqi Fan 1
- Michel Galley 1
- Jianfeng Gao 1
- Yuren Hao 1
- Dongfu Jiang 1
- Jize Jiang 1
- Ziyan Jiang 1
- Max Ku 1
- Zuojun Li 1
- Bill Yuchen Lin 1
- Zeyi Liu 1
- Bohan Lyu 1
- Zhiheng Lyu 1
- Linrui Ma 1
- Yaswanth Narsupalli 1
- Yuansheng Ni 1
- Ping Nie 1
- Nanyun Peng 1
- Sherman Siu 1
- Achint Soni 1
- Chenkai Sun 1
- Chenglong Wang 1
- Kai Wang 1
- Cong Wei 1
- Yuhao Wen 1
- Keming Wu 1
- Ke Yang 1
- Rui Yang 1
- Da Yin 1
- ChengXiang Zhai 1
- Ge Zhang 1
- Yuxuan Zhang 1
- Kai Zou 1