Xueqian Zhao
Author directory2026
Rethinking Content Moderation via Severity-Aware Ranking
Yang Ou | Jielei Zhang | Yu Dai | Zian Yang | Run Yang | Xiang Li | Weihang Wang | Xueqian Zhao | Peiyi Li | Longwen Gao
Proceedings of the 2026 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing: Industry Track
Yang Ou | Jielei Zhang | Yu Dai | Zian Yang | Run Yang | Xiang Li | Weihang Wang | Xueqian Zhao | Peiyi Li | Longwen Gao
Proceedings of the 2026 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing: Industry Track
Online video content moderation is critical for protecting minors. Violations are increasingly implicit and context-dependent: a swimwear is innocuous in a vlog but high-risk with suggestive posing. Yet, traditional binary systems fundamentally fail to capture this continuous severity spectrum, directly leading to both excessive false positives for context-heavy samples and missing deeply implicit violations. We introduce KUROKO, a content moderation system that acts as a behind-the-scenes assistant, driving a paradigm shift in content moderation from binary classification to severity-aware ranking. Our contributions are threefold: (1) Human-Centric Severity Ranking: KUROKO shifts from rigid binary divides to a continuous risk spectrum, producing nuanced, expert-level rationales closely aligning with human judgment. (2) Verifiable Alignment and Interpretability: By integrating a severity-aware data engine and a verifiable reinforcement learning approach, we replace black-box decisions with transparent, actionable diagnostics. (3) Cost-Efficient Deployment: We engineer a coarse-to-fine inference architecture equipped with a lightweight recall classifier, enabling compact models to rival proprietary VLMs at a fraction of the computational cost. Extensive offline and online A/B tests demonstrate KUROKO’s advantages over traditional binary baselines and its competitiveness with leading commercial APIs at a fraction of their scale. Online, KUROKO yields more human-confirmed enforcement actions under an equal human-review budget, while lowering violative exposure and user negative feedback.