“尽管大语言模型在自然语言处理任务中取得显著进展,但其在复杂问题推理等领域还面临着认知负荷问题,即大语言模型在推理过程需要记忆并处理大量信息。因此,如何有效地减少语言模型推理过程中的认知负荷,缓解推理过程中可能出现的认知过载是一个亟待解决的问题。对此本文提出了Self-Guide方法,用于增强语言模型的推理能力。该方法通过指引大语言模型生成常识知识和推理指导,让语言模型基于自我规划来增强其推理能力,并通过与推理链结合的方式对模型的推理过程进行校准。与现有方法不同的是,本文在不对大语言模型进行微调或使用外部工具的情况下,显著提升了语言模型的推理性能。实验结果表明,Self-Guide方法在四种常见推理任务上性能显著优于基线方法,同时相比传统的推理链模型,Self-Guide方法在推理能力较弱的模型上也具有良好的泛化性能。通过结合大语言模型的自我规划和推理能力,Self-Guide方法为提升语言模型的推理能力提供了一种新的有效途径。”

“Free-form table question answering is a challenging task since tables contain structured contentscompared to plain texts, which requires high-level reasoning abilities to effectively identify cellsthat are relevant to the question and produce a correct and faithful answer based on their relations.Large language models (LLMs) have exhibited remarkable reasoning capabilities in numerousNLP applications. However, in some specific tasks, specially-trained small models can still out-perform LLMs. Furthermore, small models require extremely less computation costs comparedto LLMs. To leverage the strengths of both types of models, we propose a Relevant-Cell-basedKnowledge Distillation with inference-time Teacher Guidance (RCKD-TG) method. This ap-proach aims to combine small free-form table question answering models’ abilities to learn fromhuman annotations and large language models’ abilities to effectively reason from table contents,via applying Relevant-Cell-based rationales distilled from LLMs to small models’ training andinference stages. Our experiments demonstrate the superiority of our method over vanilla smallmodels in correctness, faithfulness, adequacy and fluency, also over general LLMs in adheringto the style of human annotations. We achieve state-of-the-art performance on FeTaQA, a rep-resentative free-form table question answering benchmark. Our result of a 41.3 BLEU scoredemonstrates the feasibility of effectively using small models’ task-specific abilities and LLMs’reasoning capabilities at the same time. Additionally, our method exhibits high computation ef-ficiency and data efficiency. Compared to strong baselines, we achieve better performance withsignificantly less training data.”