Large Audio-Language Models (LALMs) have demonstrated strong performance in spoken question answering (QA), with existing evaluations primarily focusing on answer accuracy and robustness to acoustic perturbations. However, such evaluations implicitly assume that spoken inputs remain semantically answerable, an assumption that often fails in real-world interaction when essential information is missing. In this work, we introduce a repair-aware evaluation setting that explicitly distinguishes between answerable and unanswerable audio inputs. We define answerability as a property of the input itself and construct paired evaluation conditions using a semantic-acoustic masking protocol. Based on this setting, we propose the Evaluability Awareness and Repair (EAR) score, a non-compensatory metric that jointly evaluates task competence under answerable conditions and repair behavior under unanswerable conditions. Experiments on two spoken QA benchmarks across diverse LALMs reveal a consistent gap between answer accuracy and conversational reliability: while many models perform well when inputs are answerable, most fail to recognize semantic unanswerability and initiate appropriate conversational repair. These findings expose a limitation of prevailing accuracy-centric evaluation practices and motivate reliability assessments that treat unanswerable inputs as cues for repair and continued interaction. The core code and dataset are publicly available at https://github.com/sheunghung/EAR.

Large Language Models (LLMs) have demonstrated remarkable fidelity in simulating social dynamics, yet using them to inform high-stakes crisis policy requires rigorous causal evaluation. We introduce CRISIS COGNITION, a framework rooted in generative Structural Causal Models (SCM) that functions as an in-silico hypothesis generator. By coupling real-world telemetry with 1,813 agents, we conduct a counterfactual simulation to evaluate communication strategies. Unlike prior descriptive work, we employ a Stratified Analysis to strictly control for personality confounders. Our simulations generate a computational hypothesis: within the LLM’s generative process, emotional scaffolding serves as a functional prerequisite to unlock valid reasoning paths for high-neuroticism agents. Crucially, we identify a “Sedative Effect” in simultaneous interventions, confirming that the sequence of support is as vital as the content. This framework provides a rigorous testbed for evaluating strategies before human-subject trials.

Recent advances in text-to-audio-video (T2AV) generation have enabled models to synthesize audio-visual videos with multi-participant dialogues. However, existing evaluation benchmarks remain largely designed for human-recorded videos or single-speaker settings. As a result, structural failures in generated multi-talker dialogue videos, such as identity drift, unnatural turn transitions, and audio-visual misalignment, cannot be effectively diagnosed. To address this issue, we introduce MTAVG-Bench, a failure-driven diagnostic benchmark for multi-talker dialogue-centric audio-video generation. MTAVG-Bench is built via a semi-automatic pipeline, where 1.8k videos are generated using mainstream T2AV models with carefully designed prompts, yielding 2.4k manually annotated QA pairs for fine-grained failure diagnosis. The benchmark evaluates multi-speaker dialogue generation at four levels: audio-visual signal fidelity, temporal attribute consistency, social interaction, and cinematic expression. Built on a hierarchical failure taxonomy and a targeted QA protocol, MTAVG-Bench is primarily designed to evaluate whether proprietary and open-source omni-models can reliably identify failure modes in multi-speaker T2AV outputs. We benchmark 12 proprietary and open-source omni-models on MTAVG-Bench, with Gemini 3 Pro achieving the strongest overall performance, while leading open-source models remain competitive in signal fidelity and consistency. Overall, MTAVG-Bench enables fine-grained failure analysis for rigorous model comparison and targeted video generation refinement.

End-to-end automatic speech recognition (ASR) based on deep learning has achieved impressive progress in recent years. However, the performance of ASR foundation model often degrades significantly on out-of-domain data due to real-world domain shifts. Test-Time Adaptation (TTA) methods aim to mitigate this issue by adapting models during inference without access to source data. Despite recent progress, existing ASR TTA methods often struggle with instability under continual and long-term distribution shifts. To alleviate the risk of performance collapse due to error accumulation, we propose Dynamic Model-bank Single-Utterance Test-time Adaptation (DMSUTA), a sustainable continual TTA framework based on adaptive ASR model ensembling. DMSUTA maintains a dynamic model bank, from which a subset of checkpoints is selected for each test sample based on confidence and uncertainty criteria. To preserve both model plasticity and long-term stability, DMSUTA actively manages the bank by filtering out potentially collapsed models. This design allows DMSUTA to continually adapt to evolving domain shifts in ASR test-time scenarios. Experiments on diverse, continuously shifting ASR TTA benchmarks show that DMSUTA consistently outperforms existing continual TTA baselines, demonstrating superior robustness to domain shifts in ASR.

“人工评估,作为生成式文本质量评价的金标准,成本太高;自动评估,核心思想在于要使其评估结果与人工评估高度相关,从而实现对生成式文本质量的自动化分析和评价。随着自然语言处理领域相关技术的迭代进步,使得生成式文本质量的自动评估技术,已然经历了多次技术范式的迭代。然而,学界至今依然缺乏对生成式文本质量自动评估技术的系统化总结。因此,本文将首先系统地对已有的生成式文本自动评估方法进行归纳总结,然后分析了生成式文本自动评估方法的主要发展趋势,最后为了使读者更加宏观地了解自动评估整体,对自动评估领域整体的未来研究方向进行了探讨和展望。”