Patient-facing medical LLMs are typically evaluated for clinical knowledge and safety, but clinically correct answers can still fail patients by missing fear, mishandling uncertainty, or offering emotionally unsafe reassurance. We introduce MedEQ, a benchmark for clinical emotional intelligence in medical communication. MedEQ includes 413 clinically grounded consultation scenarios across 51 specialties and 7,336 expert-refined rubric items over 21 core dimensions. These expert-validated rubrics operationalize emotional cue recognition, empathic adequacy, ethical emotional regulation, and affective safety, enabling diagnostic evaluation rather than a single holistic empathy score. Using an LLM-as-judge rubric pipeline, we find that strong contemporary models often handle surface compassion, safety, and response structure, yet remain weak on deeper emotional inference, personalization, mixed emotions, cultural context, and real-time responses to illness-related distress. We further conduct a proof-of-concept rubric-guided reinforcement learning study, showing that MedEQ-derived rubric signals can transfer to an independent emotional intelligence benchmark: rubric-guided training of Qwen3-32B improves EQ-Bench performance from 42.42 to 81.49 while preserving or slightly improving standard medical benchmark scores. MedEQ therefore makes clinical emotional intelligence measurable and decomposable, and provides evidence that expert-refined rubrics can support the evaluation and improvement of patient-facing medical AI.

Masked Diffusion Language Models (MDLMs) promise parallel token generation and arbitrary-order decoding, yet it remains unclear to what extent current models truly realize these capabilities. We characterize MDLM behavior along two dimensions—parallelism strength and generation order—using Average Finalization Parallelism (AFP) and Kendall’s τ. We evaluate eight mainstream MDLMs (up to 100B parameters) on 58 benchmarks spanning knowledge, reasoning, and programming. The results show that MDLMs still lag behind comparably sized autoregressive models, mainly because parallel probabilistic modeling weakens inter-token dependencies. Meanwhile, MDLMs exhibit adaptive decoding behavior: their parallelism and generation order vary significantly with the task domain, the stage of reasoning, and whether the output is correct. On tasks that require “backward information” (e.g., Sudoku), MDLMs adopt a solution order that tends to fill easier Sudoku blanks first, highlighting their advantages. Finally, we provide theoretical motivation and design insights supporting a Generate-then-Edit paradigm, which mitigates dependency loss while retaining the efficiency of parallel decoding.

While Large Language Models (LLMs) have increasingly assisted in historical tasks such as text processing, their capacity for professional-level historical reasoning remains underexplored. Existing benchmarks primarily assess basic knowledge breadth or lexical understanding, failing to capture the higher-order skills—such as evidentiary reasoning—that are central to historical research. To fill this gap, we introduce ProHist-Bench, a novel benchmark anchored in the Chinese Imperial Examination (Keju) system—a comprehensive microcosm of East Asian political, social, and intellectual history spanning over 1,300 years. Developed through deep interdisciplinary collaboration, ProHist-Bench features 400 challenging, expert-curated questions across eight dynasties, accompanied by 10,891 fine-grained evaluation rubrics. Through a rigorous evaluation of 18 LLMs, we reveal a significant proficiency gap: even state-of-the-art LLMs struggle with complex historical research questions. We hope ProHist-Bench will facilitate the development of domain-specific reasoning LLMs, advance computational historical research, and further uncover the untapped potential of LLMs. We release ProHist-Bench at https://github.com/inclusionAI/ABench/tree/main/ProHist-Bench.

As speech generation technology advances, the risk of misuse through deepfake audio has become a pressing concern, which underscores the critical need for robust detection systems. However, many existing speech deepfake datasets are limited in scale and diversity, making it challenging to train models that can generalize well to unseen deepfakes. To address these gaps, we introduce SpeechFake, a large-scale dataset designed specifically for speech deepfake detection. SpeechFake includes over 3 million deepfake samples, totaling more than 3,000 hours of audio, generated using 40 different speech synthesis tools. The dataset encompasses a wide range of generation techniques, including text-to-speech, voice conversion, and neural vocoder, incorporating the latest cutting-edge methods. It also provides multilingual support, spanning 46 languages. In this paper, we offer a detailed overview of the dataset’s creation, composition, and statistics. We also present baseline results by training detection models on SpeechFake, demonstrating strong performance on both its own test sets and various unseen test sets. Additionally, we conduct experiments to rigorously explore how generation methods, language diversity, and speaker variation affect detection performance. We believe SpeechFake will be a valuable resource for advancing speech deepfake detection and developing more robust models for evolving generation techniques.