Yanming Li
Author directory2026
Feasible is Not Enough: Cost-Aware Optimal Tool-Chain Planning on Multi-Solution Tool Graphs
Liangliang Liu | Yanming Li | Yigang Liu | Jialong Han | Rujia Shen | Yi Guan | Yi Lin | Jingchi Jiang
Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: ACL 2026
Liangliang Liu | Yanming Li | Yigang Liu | Jialong Han | Rujia Shen | Yi Guan | Yi Lin | Jingchi Jiang
Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: ACL 2026
Tool graphs (TG) model dependencies among tools and resources, enabling more structured organization and management of large toolsets. However, existing methods and benchmarks often formulate tool learning (TL) as a single-solution setting, overlooking the fact that many tasks admit multiple valid tool combinations and therefore require optimal solution selection. Moreover, exploring large-scale TG is computationally expensive, especially under constrained context budgets. To address these challenges, we propose TOPT, an efficient framework for learning optimal TL policies over large TG, as well as construct MultiSoTLBench, a large-scale Multi-Solution TL Benchmark, where each task admits multiple valid solutions. Specifically, to improve search efficiency in large action spaces, TOPT adopts a progressive graph expansion strategy: we train a reinforcement learning (RL) agent to acquire transferable expansion skills and construct, on demand, a compact solvable subgraph that preserves only task-relevant links. This reduces the size of the candidate space and the context usage from the outset. To enable optimal selection, we further propose a progressive graph reasoning framework. It performs RL-driven optimality analysis and scheduling on the expanded subgraph to generate an optimal tool chain that balances path length and tool cost. Comprehensive experiments on MultiSoTLBench demonstrate that TOPT generalizes effectively, improving task success and solution optimality by 46.21% and 66.34%, respectively.
2025
GPT makes a poor AMR parser
Yanming Li | Meaghan Fowlie
Journal for Language Technology and Computational Linguistics, Vol. 38 No. 2: LLM Fails - Failed experiments with generative AI and what we can learn from them
Yanming Li | Meaghan Fowlie
Journal for Language Technology and Computational Linguistics, Vol. 38 No. 2: LLM Fails - Failed experiments with generative AI and what we can learn from them
This paper evaluates GPT models as out-of-the-box Abstract Meaning Representation (AMR) parsers using prompt-based strategies, including 0-shot, few-shot, Chain-of-Thought (CoT), and a two-step approach in which core arguments and non-core roles are handled separately. Our results show that GPT-3.5 and GPT-4o fall well short of state-of-the-art parsers, with a maximum Smatch score of 60 using GPT-4o in a 5-shot setting. While CoT prompting provides some interpretability, it does not improve performance. We further conduct fine-grained evaluations, revealing GPT’s limited ability to handle AMR-specific linguistic structures and complex semantic roles. Our findings suggest that, despite recent advances, GPT models are not yet suitable as standalone AMR parsers.
Open-World Attribute Mining for E-Commerce Products with Multimodal Self-Correction Instruction Tuning
Jiaqi Li | Yanming Li | Xiaoli Shen | Chuanyi Zhang | Guilin Qi | Sheng Bi
Proceedings of the 63rd Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers)
Jiaqi Li | Yanming Li | Xiaoli Shen | Chuanyi Zhang | Guilin Qi | Sheng Bi
Proceedings of the 63rd Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers)
In e-commerce, effective product Attribute Mining (AM) is essential for improving product features and aiding consumer decisions. However, current AM methods often focus on extracting attributes from unimodal text, underutilizing multimodal data. In this paper, we propose a novel framework called Multimodal Self-Correction Instruction Tuning (MSIT) to mine new potential attributes from both images and text with Multimodal Large Language Models. The tuning process involves two datasets: Attribute Generation Tuning Data (AGTD) and Chain-of-Thought Tuning Data (CTTD). AGTD is constructed utilizing in-context learning with a small set of seed attributes, aiding the MLLM in accurately extracting attribute-value pairs from multimodal information. To introduce explicit reasoning and improve the extraction in accuracy, we construct CTTD, which incorporates a structured 5-step reasoning process for self-correction. Finally, we employ a 3-stage inference process to filter out redundant attributes and sequentially validate each generated attribute. Comprehensive experimental results on two datasets show that MSIT outperforms state-of-the-art methods. We will release our code and data in the near future.