Causal thinking enables humans to understand not just what is seen, but why it happens. To bring this ability to modern AI systems, we introduce visual causal discovery, the task of inferring visually verifiable direct causal dependencies among entities in a single static image. We construct the Visual Causal Graph dataset (VCG-32K), a large-scale collection of over 32,000 images annotated with entity-level causal graphs, and develop Causight, a causally aware vision-language model for this task. Our training recipe combines data curation from VCG-32K, Tree-of-Causal-Thought (ToCT) reasoning synthesis, and reinforcement learning with a graph-structured causal reward. Experiments show that Causight outperforms GPT-4.1, achieving over a threefold performance boost (21% absolute gain).

Performing causal reasoning akin to humans is fundamental to achieving strong artificial intelligence. However, existing studies on causal reasoning and large language models (LLMs) often underestimate the role of human causal cognition. Human causal reasoning is far more than recognizing causes and effects. Humans often factor in many other considerations when establishing a causal link between two events, such as norm violations, intentionality, morality, counterfactual scenarios, etc. To simulate such reasoning, it is intuitive to identify cause-effect pairs using token causality formalisms while modeling the factors that influence human causal judgment using findings from cognitive science experiments. To support the evaluation and modeling of human-like causal reasoning in LLMs, we introduce HCR-Bench, a challenging benchmark with 1,093 instances and detailed human causal reasoning step annotations, and HCR-Reasoner, an approach that systematically integrates theories of token causality and cognitive science into LLMs for human-like causal reasoning. Results suggest that HCR-Reasoner consistently improves LLMs’ causal alignment with humans, and that theory-guided reasoning is highly effective.

Document-level Event Argument Extraction (EAE) requires the model to extract arguments of multiple events from a single document. Considering the underlying dependencies between these events, recent efforts leverage the idea of “memory”, where the results of already predicted events are cached and can be retrieved to help the prediction of upcoming events. These methods extract events according to their appearance order in the document, however, the event that appears in the first sentence does not mean that it is the easiest to extract. Existing methods might introduce noise to the extraction of upcoming events if they rely on an incorrect prediction of previous events. In order to provide more reliable memory, we propose a simple-to-complex progressive framework for document-level EAE. Specifically, we first calculate the difficulty of each event and then, we conduct the extraction following a simple-to-complex order. In this way, the memory will store the most certain results, and the model could use these reliable sources to help the prediction of more difficult events. Experiments on WikiEvents show that our model outperforms SOTA by 1.4% in F1, indicating the proposed simple-to-complex framework is useful in the EAE task.