Multilingual large language models achieve impressive cross-lingual performance despite largely monolingual pretraining. While bilingual data in pretraining corpora is widely believed to enable these abilities, details of its contributions remain unclear. We investigate this question by pretraining models from scratch under controlled conditions, comparing the standard web corpus with a monolingual-only version that removes all multilingual documents. Despite constituting only 2% of the corpus, removing bilingual data causes translation performance to drop 56% in BLEU, while behaviour on cross-lingual QA and general reasoning tasks remains stable, with training curves largely overlapping the baseline. To understand this asymmetry, we categorize bilingual data into parallel (14%), code-switching (72%), and miscellaneous documents (14%) based on the semantic relevance of content in different languages. We then conduct granular ablations by reintroducing parallel or code-switching data into the monolingual-only corpus. Our experiments reveal that parallel data almost fully restores translation performance (91% of the unfiltered baseline), whereas code-switching contributes minimally. Other cross-lingual tasks remain largely unaffected by either type. These findings reveal that translation critically depends on systematic token-level alignments from parallel data, whereas cross-lingual understanding and reasoning appear to be achievable even without bilingual data.

English, as a very high-resource language, enables the pretraining of high-quality large language models (LLMs). However, the same can not be said for most other languages, likely due to a gap in the quality and diversity of available multilingual pretraining corpora. In this work, we find that documents machine-translated from a high-quality English corpus, can contribute significantly to the pretraining quality of multilingual LLMs. Concretely, we translate FineWeb-Edu, a high-quality English web corpus, into nine languages. resulting in a 1.7-trillion-token corpus, which we call TransWebEdu and pretrain a 1.3B-parameter model, TransWebLLM, from scratch on this corpus. Across Non-English understanding and reasoning tasks, we show that TransWebLLM matches or even outperforms multilingual LLMs of similar size, including Llama3.2, Qwen2.5, and Gemma3, despite being trained on an order of magnitude less data. Moreover, we show that adding fewer than 5% of TransWebLLM’s training tokens as domain-specific data for continued pretraining yields state-of-the-art results in Arabic, Indonesian, Swahili, and Welsh for understanding and commonsense reasoning tasks. To promote reproducibility, we release our corpus and models under Open Source Initiative-approved licenses.

Diffusion models are the state of the art in text-to-image generation, but their perceptual variability remains understudied. In this paper, we examine how prompts affect image variability in black-box diffusion-based models. We propose W1KP, a human-calibrated measure of variability in a set of images, bootstrapped from existing image-pair perceptual distances. Current datasets do not cover recent diffusion models, thus we curate three test sets for evaluation. Our best perceptual distance outperforms nine baselines by up to 18 points in accuracy, and our calibration matches graded human judgements 78% of the time. Using W1KP, we study prompt reusability and show that Imagen prompts can be reused for 10-50 random seeds before new images become too similar to already generated images, while Stable Diffusion XL and DALL-E 3 can be reused 50-200 times. Lastly, we analyze 56 linguistic features of real prompts, finding that the prompt’s length, CLIP embedding norm, concreteness, and word senses influence variability most. As far as we are aware, we are the first to analyze diffusion variability from a visuolinguistic perspective. Our project page is at http://w1kp.com.