Large reasoning models (LRMs) have achieved remarkable success on complex tasks, yet their tendency to "overthink” leads to inefficiencies. Although "save-thinking” prompts are intended to mitigate this issue, we find that LRMs still frequently enter the "Still-thinking” mode instead of the expected "No-thinking” mode, especially when facing difficult queries. First, we examine the LRM’s confidence when terminating thinking process, finding that high perplexity signals internal uncertainty and precedes the thinking process. Second, we analyze the divergence in internal attention distributions across different LRMs. Third, we investigate where the LRM allocates its attention within the prompt, identifying a critical "re-reading” pattern. Based on these analyses, we propose an attention intervention method to regulate this behavior. While this intervention successfully suppresses thinking, we find it causes a drop in accuracy, confirming that the thinking process is functional. Our work provides a mechanistic explanation for this behavior, highlighting the trade-off between instruction following and reasoning correctness, and offers insights for developing more controllable LRMs.

Thinking LLMs produce reasoning traces before answering. Prior activation steering work mainly targets on shaping these traces. It remains less understood how answer tokens actually read and integrate the reasoning to produce reliable outcomes. Focusing on quantitative reasoning, we analyze the answer-to-reasoning attention and observe a benign self-reading pattern aligned with correctness, characterized by a forward drift of the reading focus along the reasoning trace and a persistent concentration on key semantic anchors, whereas incorrect solutions exhibit diffuse and irregular attention pattern. We interpret this as internal certainty during answer decoding, where the model commits to a viable solution branch and integrates key evidence. Following this, we propose a training-free steering method driven by Self-Reading Quality (SRQ) scores combining geometric metrics for process control with semantic metrics for content monitoring. SRQ selects data to build steering vectors that guide inference toward benign self-reading and away from uncertain and disorganized reading. Experiments show that our method yields consistent accuracy gains.

Long-horizon tool-use agents need not only to search and plan, but also to decide when to finalize. We study late-stage pressure states, in which an agent is biased toward submitting a final answer that appears complete and polished while key constraints remain unresolved. We first train a linear probe to show that this pressure state is identifiable from the agent’s hidden states. Then, we use activation interventions along this pressure direction and find that shifting the hidden states changes both the pressure score and whether the agent continues tool use or submits early. Through controlled context manipulations, we further see that the pressure is mitigated by constraint clarity and action mapping. Based on these findings, we propose Probe-Sensed Pressure Relief (PSPR), a plugin that applies lightweight pressure relief direction under moderate pressure and moves to structured organization under high pressure risk. Experiments on multiple long-horizon benchmarks show that our method consistently strengthens existing agent methods.

Reinforcement learning (RL) for search agents typically relies on outcome rewards. However, it often fails to achieve effective credit assignment, due to the unclear value of intermediate steps. It is hard to separate their contributions from the final result. In this paper, we propose a dense process supervision method based on fact utility estimation, which models the reasoning process as the accumulation of discrete evidence facts. We first extract structured facts from raw observations and organize them into an explicit fact store. To support credit assignment, we then cluster semantically equivalent facts and infer the posterior utility of each fact cluster using Bayesian estimation over group rollouts. Finally, we convert the estimated fact utilities into dense step-level rewards to guide RL training. Experiments on seven single-hop and multi-hop QA benchmarks show that our method consistently outperforms existing baselines. Ablation studies validate clear relative improvements on multi-hop QA compared to outcome reward-only training.

Retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) has emerged as a promising technology for addressing hallucination issues in the responses generated by large language models (LLMs). Existing studies on RAG primarily focus on applying semantic-based approaches to retrieve isolated relevant chunks, which ignore their intrinsic relationships. In this paper, we propose a novel Knowledge Graph-Guided Retrieval Augmented Generation (KG²RAG) framework that utilizes knowledge graphs (KGs) to provide fact-level relationships between chunks, improving the diversity and coherence of the retrieved results. Specifically, after performing a semantic-based retrieval to provide seed chunks, KG²RAG employs a KG-guided chunk expansion process and a KG-based chunk organization process to deliver relevant and important knowledge in well-organized paragraphs. Extensive experiments conducted on the HotpotQA dataset and its variants demonstrate the advantages of KG²RAG compared to existing RAG-based approaches, in terms of both response quality and retrieval quality.

In a rapidly evolving world where information updates swiftly, knowledge in large language models (LLMs) becomes outdated quickly. Retraining LLMs is not a cost-effective option, making knowledge editing (KE) without modifying parameters particularly necessary. We find that although existing retrieval-augmented generation (RAG)-based KE methods excel at editing simple knowledge, they struggle with KE in multi-hop question answering due to the issue of ”edit skipping”, which refers to skipping the relevant edited fact in inference. In addition to the diversity of natural language expressions of knowledge, edit skipping also arises from the mismatch between the granularity of LLMs in problem-solving and the facts in the edited memory. To address this issue, we propose a novel Iterative Retrieval-Augmented Knowledge Editing method with guided decomposition (IRAKE) through the guidance from single edited facts and entire edited cases. Experimental results demonstrate that IRAKE mitigates the failure of editing caused by edit skipping and outperforms state-of-the-art methods for KE in multi-hop question answering.