Cascaded Automatic Speech Recognition — Large Language Model (ASR-LLM) pipelines remain popular for industrial Spoken Dialogue Systems (SDS), primarily because their decoupled design ensures perceptual verifiability. However, cascaded systems suffer from error propagation, as transcription failures inevitably cascade to subsequent components, thereby degrading the final interaction quality. Although ASR confidence scores offer a simple filter for unreliable inputs, this approach is fundamentally limited because it typically fails to detect deletion errors or to distinguish between acoustic (inability to hear clearly) and linguistic (inability to understand) mismatches, both of which require targeted recovery strategies. In this paper, we propose a cause-aware error recovery paradigm that fundamentally rethinks robustness in SDS. Unlike traditional confidence filtering, we introduce a suite of small precision-focused detectors that exploit deep ASR latent representations to disentangle token-level errors into perception, comprehension, and deletion failures. This fine-grained diagnostic intelligence empowers the LLM to orchestrate targeted, multi-turn clarification strategies, effectively transforming ambiguous signals into seamless user interactions. Experimental results validate the precision of our approach, which more than doubles the recall on domain-shift errors (57.96% vs. 23.66%) compared to baselines. Crucially, this diagnostic precision yields up to a 31% reduction in WER and a 19% improvement on the downstream task across diverse accents, distortions, and domains.

Vocal behavior provides important signals for speech-based depression detection, but its interpretation often depends on what is being said and how it functions in context. However, existing methods typically treat acoustic cues as context-independent markers, making it difficult to distinguish vocal form from its context-dependent communicative function. We propose ParaCalib, a framework that semantically calibrates paralinguistic behavior by interpreting vocal patterns relative to utterance-level semantic context and inferred communicative function and representing them in a comparable state space. Concretely, ParaCalib uses an Audio-Language Model (ALM) to generate contextualized vocal descriptions and an LLM-based Paralinguistic State Extractor (PSE) to map these descriptions into a structured Semantically Calibrated Paralinguistic (SC-Para) representation. ParaCalib achieves the highest mean Macro-F1 among the evaluated methods, reaching 71.9% on DAIC-WOZ and 90.5% on MODMA. Our controlled analysis provides direct evidence of semantic calibration at the PSE stage: under a fixed caption-level acoustic description, varying the accompanying semantic context changes the inferred depression-related paralinguistic evidence. Our exploratory analysis further identifies recurring configurations of paralinguistic states associated with depression labels rather than a single uniformly dominant state.

Evaluating expressive speech remains challenging, as existing methods mainly assess emotional intensity and overlook whether a speech sample is expressively appropriate for its contextual setting. This limitation hinders reliable evaluation of speech systems used in narrative-driven and interactive applications, such as audiobooks and conversational agents. We introduce CEAEval, a Context-rich framework for Evaluating Expressive Appropriateness in speech, which assesses whether a speech sample expressively aligns with the underlying communicative intent implied by its discourse-level narrative context. To support this task, we construct CEAEval-D, the first context-rich speech dataset with real human performances in Mandarin conversational speech, providing narrative descriptions together with fifteen dimensions of human annotations covering expressive attributes and expressive appropriateness. We further develop CEAEval-M, a model that integrates knowledge distillation, planner-based multi-model collaboration, adaptive audio attention bias, and reinforcement learning to perform context-rich expressive appropriateness evaluation. Experiments on a human-annotated test set demonstrate that CEAEval-M substantially outperforms existing speech evaluation and analysis systems.