Although the Universal Transformer (UT) mitigates the diminishing returns of standard LLM scaling by decoupling parameter count from depth, it remains constrained by linear computational costs and rigid weight-sharing mechanisms. These limitations lead to severe functional homogeneity, which subsequently induces over-smoothing, representation rank collapse, and degraded reasoning performance. In this work, we present the first systematic study of Compute Distribution Skew, identifying it as the primary driver of extrapolation failure. This is a pathological phenomenon in ultra-deep recurrent Transformers characterized by a disproportionate distribution of contributions across recurrent steps, resulting in distinct functional states during prefix and suffix processing phases. To address this challenge, we propose the Polymorphic Transformer, which aims to achieve functional polymorphism and depth sparsity within a shared-parameter framework. By integrating conditional sparse subspaces, SiLU Attention, and an uncertainty-aware depth scheduler, our architecture mitigates power-method collapse and effectively decouples logical depth from computational cost. Experiments demonstrate that our model significantly enhances representation rank and robustness, achieving complex reasoning performance comparable to baseline while reducing computation by 64.7%.

Pre-trained language models (PLMs) have shown unprecedented potential in various fields, especially as the backbones for question-answering (QA) systems. However, they tend to be easily deceived by tricky questions such as “How many eyes does the sun have?”. Such frailties of PLMs often allude to the lack of knowledge within them. In this paper, we find that the PLMs already possess the knowledge required to rebut such questions, and the key is how to activate the knowledge. To systematize this observation, we investigate the PLMs’ responses to one kind of tricky questions, i.e., the false premises questions (FPQs). We annotate a FalseQA dataset containing 2365 human-written FPQs, with the corresponding explanations for the false premises and the revised true premise questions. Using FalseQA, we discover that PLMs are capable of discriminating FPQs by fine-tuning on moderate numbers (e.g., 256) of examples. PLMs also generate reasonable explanations for the false premise, which serve as rebuttals. Further replaying a few general questions during training allows PLMs to excel on FPQs and general questions simultaneously. Our work suggests that once the rebuttal ability is stimulated, knowledge inside the PLMs can be effectively utilized to handle FPQs, which incentivizes the research on PLM-based QA systems. The FalseQA dataset and code are available at https://github.com/thunlp/FalseQA .