Current approaches for Multimodal Sentiment Analysis (MSA) primarily leverage the knowledge and reasoning capabilities of parameter-heavy (Multimodal) LLMs for classification, overlooking autonomous multimodal sentiment reasoning generation in resource-constrained environments.In this paper, we focus on the Resource-Limited Joint Multimodal Sentiment Reasoning and Classification task, JMSRC, which simultaneously performs multimodal sentiment reasoning chain generation and sentiment classification only with a lightweight model.We propose a Multimodal Chain-of-Thought Reasoning Distillation model, MulCoT-RD, designed for JMSRC that employs a "Teacher-Assistant-Student" distillation paradigm to address deployment constraints in resource-limited environments.We first leverage a high-performance Multimodal Large Language Model (MLLM) to generate the initial reasoning dataset and train a medium-sized assistant model with a multi-task learning mechanism. A lightweight student model is jointly trained to perform efficient multimodal sentiment reasoning generation and classification.Extensive experiments on four datasets demonstrate that MulCoT-RD with only 3B parameters and achieves strong performance on JMSRC, while exhibiting robust generalization and enhanced interpretability.

Harmful memes convey offensive intent through implicit associations between visual symbols and text, requiring a broad understanding of cultural stereotypes and visual metaphors. Small-scale Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs) often lack the knowledge required to identify such implicit hate, whereas Large-scale MLLMs, despite their broader knowledge, exhibit systematic labeling bias. To address these challenges, we propose DR-HM, a Distill-then-Reinforce training framework with cognition-aware data synthesis for harmful meme detection, which aims to transfer knowledge from closed-source models while mitigating their biases. DR-HM introduces a six-step structured data synthesis scheme with self-refinement that decomposes meme analysis into a progressive, human-inspired reasoning process from entity recognition to harmfulness judgment. Based on the synthesized reasoning data, we further adopt a Distill-then-Reinforce training strategy. This approach combines a two-stage Supervised Fine-Tuning (SFT) with an Adaptive Group Relative Policy Optimization (A-GRPO) algorithm, which incorporates class-ratio-aware reward weighting and dynamic KL coefficients. Experiments on three benchmark datasets show that the proposed approach consistently outperforms existing methods and achieves an accuracy of 84.7% on the FHM dataset, approaching the reported performance of human annotators.

Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs) integrate visual encoders with Large Language Models (LLMs) and enable multimodal reasoning. However, for tasks that heavily rely on visual information, the model’s utilization of visual information remains unstable, which leads to reasoning failures. Prior works mainly strengthen multimodal reasoning by improving representation alignment or increasing computation. However, these methods do not explicitly characterize the differences in visual demands across tasks, making it difficult for the model to decide where and how strongly to attend to visual information. Consequently, visual attention allocation becomes a key factor that affects multimodal reasoning. To address these, we propose RATION, an entropy-driven task-adaptive visual attention allocation framework. First, we use a task routing strategy to infer the task type of each sample and identify the key layers. We use visual attention entropy as a control signal to dynamically allocate attention according to task demands. Experiments show that RATION achieves consistent performance gains across diverse reasoning tasks, datasets, and models, providing a clear direction toward more reliable multimodal reasoning.

Large Reasoning Models (LRMs) often suffer from overthinking, a phenomenon in which redundant reasoning steps are generated after a correct solution has already been reached. Existing early reasoning exit methods primarily rely on output-level heuristics or trained probing models to skip redundant reasoning steps, thereby mitigating overthinking. However, these approaches typically require additional rollout computation or externally labeled datasets. In this paper, we propose NEAT, a Neuron-based Early reAsoning exiT framework that monitors neuron-level activation dynamics to enable training-free early exits, without introducing any additional test-time computation. NEAT identifies exit-associated neurons and tracks their activation patterns during reasoning to dynamically trigger early exit or suppress reflection, thereby reducing unnecessary reasoning while preserving solution quality. Experiments on four reasoning benchmarks across six models with different scales and architectures show that, for each model, NEAT achieves an average token reduction of 22% to 28% when averaged over the four benchmarks, while maintaining accuracy.

Multimodal Sentiment Analysis aims to integrate information from various modalities to make complementary predictions. However, it often struggles with irrelevant or misleading visual and auditory information. Most existing approaches treat entire modality as an independent unit for feature enhancement or denoising, which often suppresses redundant noise at the cost of weakening critical information. To address this challenge, we propose MoLAN, a unified ModaLity-aware noise dynAmic editiNg framework. Specifically, MoLAN performs modality-aware block partitioning by dividing the features of each modality into multiple blocks. Each block is then dynamically assigned a distinct denoising strength based on its noise level and semantic relevance, enabling fine-grained noise suppression while preserving essential multimodal information. Notably, MoLAN is a unified and flexible framework that can be seamlessly integrated into a wide range of multimodal models. Building upon this framework, we further introduce MoLAN+, a new multimodal sentiment analysis approach. Experiments across five models and four datasets demonstrate the broad effectiveness of the MoLAN framework. Extensive evaluations show that MoLAN+ achieves the state-of-the-art performance.

Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs) rely on strong linguistic reasoning inherited from their base language models. However, multimodal instruction fine-tuning paradoxically degrades this text’s reasoning capability, undermining multimodal performance. To address this issue, we propose a training-free framework to mitigate this degradation. Through layer-wise vision token masking, we reveal a common three-stage pattern in multimodal large language models: early-modal separation, mid-modal alignment, and late-modal degradation. By analyzing the behavior of MLLMs at different stages, we propose a plateau-guided model merging method that selectively injects base language model parameters into MLLMs. Experimental results based on five MLLMs on nine benchmarks demonstrate the effectiveness of our method. Attention-based analysis further reveals that merging shifts attention from diffuse, scattered patterns to focused localization on task-relevant visual regions.Our repository is on https://github.com/wzj1718/PlaM .

Existing multimodal emotion and intent recognition tasks predominantly focus on classification, overlooking the underlying rationale and intrinsic connections between these states. Bridging this gap, we propose **Joint Multimodal Emotion-Intent Explanation and Classification, JX4MEI**, a novel task requiring the model to jointly predict emotion and intent, while generating natural language explanations for why they co-occur. To support this, we present **XMEI-dataset**, a large-scale benchmark of 15,461 multimodal samples spanning 7 emotion and 9 intent categories across text, audio, and visual modalities. Unlike prior works, our dataset provides fine-grained rationales for emotion, intent, and their causal interplay, curated via a rigorous pipeline involving Chain-of-Thought generation and strict human refinement to eliminate model artifacts. Furthermore, we propose **XMEI-Qwen**, a model equipped with a novel **Language-Query Former (LQ-Former)**. By leveraging modality-specific captions as semantic queries, LQ-Former injects explicit semantic guidance into feature alignment, significantly enhancing reasoning capabilities. Empirical experiments demonstrate that XMEI-Qwen sets a new state-of-the-art on the JX4MEI task, outperforming competitive baselines in both prediction and explanation generation. Code: https://github.com/OrangeYeah1027/JX4MEI.

Self-report questionnaires remain the default tool for probing the psychological characteristics of Large Language Model (LLM) agents, yet classical instruments (BFI, BDI, MBTI, BSS) inherit three well-known threats under LLMs: contamination from training corpora, directional bias under social-desirability framing, and limited responsiveness to context beyond the item text. We ask whether a *projective* paradigm can be adapted into a usable psychometric tool for LLM agents. We introduce **GenPT** (Generative Projective Testing), which reformulates TAT, Rorschach, and SCT with newly generated stimuli and organises assessment as a three-stage pipeline (Behavior Collection → Interpretation → Diagnosis) grounded in SCORS-G and a Simplified Rorschach Analysis System. On personality traits (Big Five, MBTI) and mental-health risks (depression, suicide ideation), questionnaires exhibit systematic directional shifts under social-desirability framing, most strongly on suicide ideation, whereas GenPT’s collected behavioral patterns stay near the symmetric baseline; under a longitudinal counselling context, GenPT-based depression assessment shifts by roughly an order of magnitude more than its questionnaire counterpart. Questionnaires remain competitive on clean-persona trait tasks where items align lexically with the persona description. Overall, GenPT complements rather than replaces self-report when contamination resistance, bias asymmetry, and context sensitivity matter. Code and stimuli: https://github.com/sci-m-wang/GenPT.

Empathetic speech dialogue requires not only understanding linguistic content but also perceiving rich paralinguistic information such as prosody, tone, and emotional intensity for affective understandings. Existing speech-to-speech large language models either rely on ASR transcription or use encoders to extract latent representations, often weakening affective information and contextual coherence in multi-turn dialogues. To address this, we propose ES4R, a framework for speech-based empathetic response generation. Our core innovation lies in explicitly modeling structured affective context before speech encoding, rather than relying on implicit learning by the encoder or explicit emotion supervision. Specifically, we introduce a dual-level attention mechanism to capture turn-level affective states and dialogue-level affective dynamics. The resulting affective representations are then integrated with textual semantics through speech-guided cross-modal attention to generate empathetic responses. For speech output, we employ energy-based strategy selection and style fusion to achieve empathetic speech synthesis. ES4R consistently outperforms strong baselines in both automatic and human evaluations and remains robust across different Large Language Model (LLM) backbones. Code: https://github.com/Bean0901/ES4R.

Efficiently aligning visual features with Large Language Models (LLMs) remains a critical bottleneck in Multimodal LLMs. Existing query-based alignment modules (e.g., Q-Former) rely on randomly initialized queries, resulting in an inefficient cold start exploration process. Furthermore, they enforce uniform cross-attention across all layers, leading to computational redundancy. Our empirical analysis reveals that query tokens initialized with language priors can rapidly capture global semantics, leading to early representation convergence after only a few layers. In this paper, we propose **Cat-MoD**, a **Ca**ption **t**oken Guided Asymmetric **M**ixture-**o**f-**D**epths framework. It incorporates a **Hybrid Query Construction** module where Guide Tokens initialized from coarse-grained linguistic priors rapidly anchor global semantic context, and randomly initialized Explorer Tokens remain active to capture fine-grained visual details. Exploiting this early convergence, we introduce an **Asymmetric Mixture-of-Depths** mechanism, where a similarity-aware router dynamically prunes redundant tokens from expensive cross-attention layers while preserving their context in self-attention. Experiments on multiple benchmarks demonstrate that Cat-MoD matches or surpasses baseline performance, while substantially reducing alignment FLOPs by approximately 37% during both training and inference, offering a highly efficient solution for multimodal alignment. Code: https://github.com/JasonOrange0726/Cat-MoD.

Triple-based Iterative Retrieval-Augmented Generation (iRAG) mitigates document-level noise for multi-hop question answering. However, existing methods still face limitations: (i) greedy single-path expansion, which propagates early errors and fails to capture parallel evidence from different reasoning branches, and (ii) granularity–demand mismatch, where a single evidence representation struggles to balance noise control with contextual sufficiency. In this paper, we propose the Construction–Integration Retrieval and Adaptive Generation model, CIRAG. It introduces an Iterative Construction–Integration module that constructs candidate triples and history-conditionally integrates them to distill core triples and generate the next-hop query. This module mitigates the greedy trap by preserving multiple plausible evidence chains. Besides, to address the granularity–demand mismatch, we propose an Adaptive Cascaded Multi-Granularity Generation module that progressively expands contextual evidence based on the problem requirements, from triples to supporting sentences and full passages. Moreover, we introduce Trajectory Distillation, which distills the teacher model’s integration policy into a lightweight student, enabling efficient and reliable long-horizon reasoning. Extensive experiments demonstrate that CIRAG achieves superior performance compared to existing iRAG methods.