Glyph-level obfuscation can leave harmful Chinese content readable to humans while degrading automated moderation. We introduce SinoGlyphBench, a diagnostic benchmark that identifies label-critical semantic anchors and creates matched original and glyph-obfuscated inputs in text and image modalities. By perturbing anchors, background context, or both, this design distinguishes corruption of moderation-relevant evidence from general surface variation. Across 176,916 paired evaluations of 12 LLMs and MLLMs, obfuscation increases harmful false-negative and false-positive rates by 6.1 and 4.7 percentage points, respectively, and reduces four-way accuracy by 5.0 points. Models retain 75.7% of the decisions that were correct on the matched original inputs. Full-scope perturbations cause the largest degradation, anchor-only perturbations are more damaging than background-only perturbations, and cross-script substitution is particularly difficult in the text modality. Analysis of structured outputs identifies observable mismatches in visible-form reading, intended-message recovery, and final safety judgment. The evaluated models, therefore, remain brittle to Chinese content written with non-canonical glyphs. Resources are available at https://github.com/fengshun124/SinoGlyphBench.

Although explainable artificial intelligence (XAI) has achieved remarkable developments in recent years, there are few efforts have been devoted to the following problems, namely, i) how to develop an explainable method that could explain the black-box in a model-agnostic way? and ii) how to improve the performance and interpretability of the black-box using such explanations instead of pre-collected important attributions? To explore the potential solution, we propose a model-agnostic explanation method termed as Sparse Contrastive Coding (SCC) and verify its effectiveness in text classification and natural language inference. In brief, SCC explains the feature attributions which characterize the importance of words based on the hidden states of each layer of the model. With such word-level explainability, SCC adaptively divides the input sentences into foregrounds and backgrounds in terms of task relevance. Through maximizing the similarity between the foregrounds and input sentences while minimizing the similarity between the backgrounds and input sentences, SSC employs a supervised contrastive learning loss to boost the interpretability and performance of the model. Extensive experiments show the superiority of our method over five state-of-the-art methods in terms of interpretability and classification measurements. The code is available at https://pengxi.me.