In clinical tabular prediction, classical machine learning models with feature engineering often outperform neural methods. LLMs are increasingly used to automate this process, acting as domain experts that propose diverse feature transformations to boost downstream performance. However, the feature generation process of existing LLM-based methods is agnostic to the downstream learner: the LLM receives no signal about which features currently drive predictions or where the model’s representational capacity falls short, so proposals are neither targeted to promising regions of the feature space nor tailored to the learner’s inductive bias. This shortcoming is amplified in healthcare data, which simultaneously exhibits class imbalance, heterogeneous feature spaces, and strict interpretability requirements. In this paper, we propose MedFeat, the first feature engineering framework inspired by the workflow of machine learning practitioners, leveraging model-awareness and feature importance signals to iteratively guide feature discovery for clinical tabular learning. We evaluate MedFeat on a broad range of challenging real-world clinical tasks and show that it statistically significantly outperforms state-of-the-art baselines, with an average F1 improvement of more than 10% over the baseline across models with distinct inductive biases.

Large language models (LLMs) can produce fluent but factually incorrect outputs and often have limited ability to attribute their claims to source material. This undermines their reliability, particularly in multi-hop and high-stakes domains such as medicine. We propose Tree-of-Quote (ToQ) prompting, a structured framework that decomposes complex questions into subquestions, generates quotes to support each step without retrieval, and selectively advances reasoning based on quote quality. We also introduce FQ-Score, a unified metric that captures answer correctness, attribution fidelity, and reasoning quality. Experiments on StrategyQA, 2WikiMultiHopQA, MuSiQue, MoreHopQA, and MedQA demonstrate that ToQ improves factuality and attribution over standard prompting baselines. To validate FQ-Score as a proxy for human judgment, we conduct two reader studies with clinicians on medical questions, and observe strong correlations. Both clinician scores and FQ-Scores also indicate a preference for ToQ over baselines due to a combination of greater correctness, completeness, and logical flow. Our results suggest ToQ is a promising approach for building more trustworthy and auditable LLM systems.