Large language models (LLMs) have shown great potential for healthcare applications. However, existing evaluation benchmarks provide minimal coverage of Alzheimer’s Disease and Related Dementias (ADRD). To address this gap, we introduce ADRD-Bench, a preliminary ADRD-specific LLM benchmark. ADRD-Bench has two components: 1) ADRD Unified QA, a synthesis of 1,438 questions consolidated from seven established medical benchmarks, providing a unified assessment of clinical knowledge; and 2) ADRD Caregiving QA, a novel set of 149 questions derived from a nationally adopted, large clinical trials supported brain health management program, mitigating the lack of practical caregiving context in existing benchmarks. We evaluated 36 state-of-the-art LLMs on the proposed ADRD-Bench. Results showed that the accuracy of open-weight general models, open-weight medical models, and frontier closed-source general models ranged from 0.63 to 0.93 (mean: 0.77; std: 0.09), 0.47 to 0.93 (mean: 0.81; std: 0.14), and 0.83 to 0.93 (mean: 0.90; std: 0.03), respectively. While top-tier models achieved high accuracies (>0.9), case studies revealed inconsistent reasoning quality and stability, highlighting a critical need for domain-specific improvement to enhance LLMs’ knowledge and reasoning grounded in daily caregiving data. The ADRD-Bench dataset and code are publicly available at https://github.com/IIRL-ND/ADRD-Bench.

AI coding agents increasingly act directly within software environments, yet existing analyses of their failures rely on benchmark trajectories that miss how developers actually experience misalignment. We present an observational study of 20,574 coding-agent sessions from 1,639 repositories across IDE and CLI workflows. We operationalize misalignment as a breakdown made visible through developer pushback, and annotate each episode along four axes: form, cause, cost, and resolution. We identify seven recurring forms, spanning how agents read projects, interpret developer intent, follow rules, bound their actions, implement and execute code, and report progress. 90.50% of episodes impose effort and trust costs rather than irreversible system damage, yet 91.49% of visible resolutions still require explicit user correction. Misalignment patterns also differ across IDE and CLI settings, persist across adjacent sessions, and shift over time: while overall rates decline, constraint violations and inaccurate self-reporting grow in share. Our findings inform the design of training, evaluation, and interfaces for keeping coding agents aligned with real developer workflows.

On a scientific concept hierarchy, a parent concept may have a few attributes, each of which has multiple values being a group of child concepts. We call these attributes facets: classification has a few facets such as application (e.g., face recognition), model (e.g., svm, knn), and metric (e.g., precision). In this work, we aim at building faceted concept hierarchies from scientific literature. Hierarchy construction methods heavily rely on hypernym detection, however, the faceted relations are parent-to-child links but the hypernym relation is a multi-hop, i.e., ancestor-to-descendent link with a specific facet “type-of”. We use information extraction techniques to find synonyms, sibling concepts, and ancestor-descendent relations from a data science corpus. And we propose a hierarchy growth algorithm to infer the parent-child links from the three types of relationships. It resolves conflicts by maintaining the acyclic structure of a hierarchy.