The rapid advancement of generative models has made synthetic images increasingly realistic, challenging reliable detection. Existing methods are often limited to end-to-end classification or monolithic reasoning, and thus fail to model structured forensic reasoning and heterogeneous visual evidence. We revisit synthetic image detection from a cognitive perspective and propose a Heuristic-to-Reasoning cognitive skill learning framework for evidence-based forensic analysis. Given an input image, our framework first extracts heuristic perceptual clues, selects the optimal forensic skill, and then performs skill-conditioned reasoning for evidence extraction and decision making. To support this paradigm, we introduce ClueAegis-Bench, which decomposes synthetic image detection into explicitly annotated forensic cognitive skills for structured evaluation beyond binary classification. Based on this benchmark, we propose ClueAegis (Cognitive-skill Learning for Unified Evidence-based Synthetic Image Detection), a two-stage agentic framework that conducts heuristic skill selection followed by evidence-guided reasoning through skill-conditioned toolchains. This design reformulates synthetic image detection as a configurable multi-skill reasoning process that bridges perception, skill selection, and forensic reasoning. Extensive experiments show that ClueAegis achieves state-of-the-art performance while improving cross-domain generalization and robustness. It also provides transparent reasoning trajectories and structured forensic evidence, offering a more explainable alternative to conventional end-to-end detectors.

Large language models (LLMs), despite their powerful capabilities, suffer from factual hallucinations where they generate verifiable falsehoods. We identify a root of this issue: the imbalanced data distribution in the pretraining corpus, which leads to a state of “low-probability truth” and “high-probability falsehood”. Recent approaches, such as teaching models to say “I don’t know” or post-hoc knowledge editing, either evade the problem or face catastrophic forgetting. To address this issue from its root, we propose PretrainRL, a novel framework that integrates reinforcement learning into the pretraining phase to consolidate factual knowledge. The core principle of PretrainRL is “debiasing then learning.” It actively reshapes the model’s probability distribution by down-weighting high-probability falsehoods, thereby making “room” for low-probability truths to be learned effectively. To enable this, we design an efficient negative sampling strategy to discover these high-probability falsehoods and introduce novel metrics to evaluate the model’s probabilistic state concerning factual knowledge. Extensive experiments on three public benchmarks demonstrate that PretrainRL significantly alleviates factual hallucinations and outperforms state-of-the-art methods.

Large language models (LLMs) have attracted significant attention due to their impressive general capabilities across diverse downstream tasks. However, without domain-specific optimization, they often underperform on specialized knowledge benchmarks and even produce hallucination. Recent studies show that strategically infusing domain knowledge during pretraining can substantially improve downstream performance. A critical challenge lies in balancing this infusion trade-off: injecting too little domain-specific data yields insufficient specialization, whereas excessive infusion triggers catastrophic forgetting of previously acquired knowledge. In this work, we focus on the phenomenon of memory collapse induced by over-infusion. Through systematic experiments, we make two key observations, i.e. 1) Critical collapse point: each model exhibits a threshold beyond which its knowledge retention capabilities sharply degrade. 2) Scale correlation: these collapse points scale consistently with the model’s size. Building on these insights, we propose a knowledge infusion scaling law that predicts the optimal amount of domain knowledge to inject into large LLMs by analyzing their smaller counterparts. Extensive experiments across different model sizes and pertaining token budgets validate both the effectiveness and generalizability of our scaling law.