Knowledge editing for large language models typically treats a fact update as a replacement in which a new object overwrites the old. Many real-world facts, however, evolve through sequences: the same subject–relation pair maps to different objects across disjoint intervals, each correct within its validity window. Existing temporal-editing benchmarks probe latest-value or explicit-time recall, so they cannot determine whether an edited model retains a coherent timeline. We introduce TKE-Bench, a diagnostic benchmark that operationalizes temporal accessibility along three reasoning-oriented axes with paraphrased variants. On TKE-Bench, all evaluated editing baselines collapse on chronologically structured queries, revealing catastrophic temporal interference (CTI). We trace CTI to a geometric property implicit in locate-and-edit methods: mid-layer subject-token keys are nearly collinear across time slices of the same subject, so stacked updates write along one direction and the latest edit overwrites every earlier value. Building on this, we propose ChronoExpert, a temporal mixture-of-experts that stores each time slice in an independent lightweight expert and activates only the matching one at inference, leaving the base model otherwise untouched. Across multiple LLM backbones, ChronoExpert consistently outperforms the strongest editing baselines and stays robust as chains grow longer.

Knowledge within large language models (LLMs) inevitably lags behind an evolving world, motivating knowledge editing methods that update facts without expensive retraining. In multi-hop knowledge editing, models must not only recall updated facts but also correctly propagate them through multi-step reasoning chains. However, most existing approaches rely on unidirectional, feed-forward pipelines, decomposing questions and retrieving edited facts in a rigid hop-wise sequence. This design is brittle: a minor retrieval error or logical mismatch at an early hop can become a silent failure that cascades to the final answer without an explicit recovery mechanism. To address this limitation, we propose Critic-Guided Multi-Agent Reasoning for Knowledge Editing (CARE), a framework for closed-loop post-edit reasoning. A Critic agent performs chain-level verification by checking both global coherence and step-wise correctness, and triggers bounded backtracking for iterative self-correction, while a Selector agent supplies high-fidelity, low-noise candidate pools from the edit store to enable effective revision. Experiments on MQuAKE-2002 and MQuAKE-hard demonstrate that CARE effectively mitigates error propagation, achieving a new state-of-the-art.