Affective cues across modalities may be incongruous (e.g., sarcasm or mocking praise), potentially leading to misinterpretation when relying on a single modality. Large Audio–Language Models (LALMs) have recently gained popularity and been applied to multimodal emotion recognition, but their ability to disentangle acoustic and semantic cues, especially in incongruent cases, remains underexplored. To address this gap, we introduce CREMA-ASIS, a dataset specifically created to investigate incongruence between acoustic emotion and semantic sentiment cues. It pairs acoustic emotion labels with semantic sentiment polarities. Using this dataset, we evaluate LALM biases within a multitask framework and conduct a layer-wise analysis to identify modality dominance across layers. Our findings reveal that LALMs struggle with semantic-acoustic incongruent cases, rarely predicting incongruity, and that LALMs are predominantly influenced by semantic information. However, supervised fine-tuning significantly improves LALM performance on our CREMA-ASIS test set while preserving transcription accuracy and joint emotion recognition. Results demonstrate potential for enhancing both acoustic and semantic understanding on out-of-domain data.

Automatic pronunciation assessment is typically performed by acoustic models trained on audio-score pairs. Although effective, these systems provide only numerical scores, without the information needed to help learners understand their errors. Meanwhile, large language models (LLMs) have proven effective in supporting language learning, but their potential for assessing pronunciation remains unexplored. In this work, we introduce TextPA, a zero-shot, Textual description-based Pronunciation Assessment approach. TextPA utilizes human-readable representations of speech signals, which are fed into an LLM to assess pronunciation accuracy and fluency, while also providing reasoning behind the assigned scores. Finally, a phoneme sequence match scoring method is used to refine the accuracy scores. Our work highlights a previously overlooked direction for pronunciation assessment. Instead of relying on supervised training with audio-score examples, we exploit the rich pronunciation knowledge embedded in written text. Experimental results show that our approach is both cost-efficient and competitive in performance. Furthermore, TextPA significantly improves the performance of conventional audio-score-trained models on out-of-domain data by offering a complementary perspective.

Summarizing medical conversations poses unique challenges due to the specialized domain and the difficulty of collecting in-domain training data. In this study, we investigate the performance of state-of-the-art doctor-patient conversation generative summarization models on the out-of-domain data. We divide the summarization model of doctor-patient conversation into two configurations: (1) a general model, without specifying subjective (S), objective (O), and assessment (A) and plan (P) notes; (2) a SOAP-oriented model that generates a summary with SOAP sections. We analyzed the limitations and strengths of the fine-tuning language model-based methods and GPTs on both configurations. We also conducted a Linguistic Inquiry and Word Count analysis to compare the SOAP notes from different datasets. The results exhibit a strong correlation for reference notes across different datasets, indicating that format mismatch (i.e., discrepancies in word distribution) is not the main cause of performance decline on out-of-domain data. Lastly, a detailed analysis of SOAP notes is included to provide insights into missing information and hallucinations introduced by the models.