Legal consultation question answering (Legal CQA) presents unique challenges compared to traditional legal QA tasks, including the scarcity of high-quality training data, complex task composition, and strong contextual dependencies. To address these, we construct JurisCQAD, a large-scale dataset of over 43,000 real-world Chinese legal queries annotated with expert-validated positive and negative responses, and design a structured task decomposition that converts each query into a legal element graph integrating entities, events, intents, and legal issues. We further propose JurisMA, a modular multi-agent framework supporting dynamic routing, statutory grounding, and stylistic optimization. Combined with the element graph, the framework enables strong context-aware reasoning, effectively capturing dependencies across legal facts, norms, and procedural logic. Trained on JurisCQAD and evaluated on a refined LawBench, our system significantly outperforms both general-purpose and legal-domain LLMs across multiple lexical and semantic metrics, demonstrating the benefits of interpretable decomposition and modular collaboration in Legal CQA.

Emerging research on bias attribution and interpretability have revealed how tokens contribute to biased behavior in language models processing English texts. We build on this line of inquiry by adapting the information-theoretic bias attribution score metric for implementation on models handling agglutinative languages—particularly Filipino. We then demonstrate the effectiveness of our adapted method by using it on a purely Filipino model and on three multilingual models—one trained on languages worldwide and two on Southeast Asian data. Our results show that Filipino models are driven towards bias by words pertaining to people, objects, and relationships—entity-based themes that stand in contrast to the action-heavy nature of bias-contributing themes in English (i.e., criminal, sexual, and prosocial behaviors). These findings point to differences in how English and non-English models process inputs linked to sociodemographic groups and bias.

In this paper, we present the system proposed by our team OldJoe, for the 8th edition of the AVeriTeC shared task, as part of the FEVER workshop. The objective of this task is to verify the factuality of real-world claims. Our approach integrates open source large language models, SQL, and in-context learning. We begin with embedding the knowledge store using a pretrained embedding language model then storing the outputs in a SQL database. Subsequently, we prompt an LLM to craft relevant questions based on the input claim, which are then used to guide the retrieval process. We further prompt the LLM to generate answers to the questions and predict the veracity of the original claim. Our system scored 0.49 on the HU-METEOR AVeriTeC score on the dev set and 0.15 on the Ev2R recall on the test set. Due to the time constraint we were unable to conduct additional experiments or further hyperparameter tuning. As a result, we adopted this pipeline configuration centered on the Qwen3-14B-AWQ model as our final submission strategy. The full pipeline is available on GitHub: https://github.com/farahft/OldJoe

Vision-language models (VLMs) achieve promising results in medical reasoning but struggle with hallucinations, vague descriptions, Inconsistent logic and poor localization. To address this, we propose a agent framework named Medical Visual Reasoning Agent (Med-VRAgent). The approach is based on Visual Guidance and Self-Reward paradigms and Monte Carlo Tree Search (MCTS). By combining the Visual Guidance with tree search, Med-VRAgent improves the medical visual reasoning capabilities of VLMs. We use the trajectories collected by Med-RAgent as feedback to further improve the performance by fine-tuning the VLMs with the proximal policy optimization (PPO) objective. Experiments on multiple medical VQA benchmarks demonstrate that our method outperforms existing approaches.

Narrative-driven recommendation queries are common in question-answering platforms, AI search engines, social forums, and some domain-specific vertical applications. Users typically submit free-form text requests for recommendations, e.g., “Any mind-bending thrillers like Shutter Island you’d recommend?” Such special queries have traditionally been addressed as generic QA task under the RAG paradigm. This work formally introduces narrative recommendation as a distinct task and contends that the RAG paradigm is inherently ill-suited for it, owing to information loss in LLMs when retrieving information from from multiple long and fragmented contexts, and limitations in ranking effectiveness. To overcome these limitations, we propose a novel retrieve-rank paradigm by theoretically demonstrating its superiority over RAG paradigm. Central to this new paradigm, we specially focus on the information retrieval stage and introduce Open-domain Candidate Generation (OCG)-Agent that generatively retrieves structurally adaptive and semantically aligned candidates, ensuring both extensive candidate coverage and high-quality information. We validate effectiveness of new paradigm and OCG-Agent’s retrieve mechanism under real-world datasets from Reddit and corporate education-consulting scenarios. Further extensive ablation studies confirming the rationality of each OCG-Agent component.

Pretrained multilingual models exhibit the same social bias as models processing English texts. This systematic review analyzes emerging research that extends bias evaluation and mitigation approaches into multilingual and non-English contexts. We examine these studies with respect to linguistic diversity, cultural awareness, and their choice of evaluation metrics and mitigation techniques. Our survey illuminates gaps in the field’s dominant methodological design choices (e.g., preference for certain languages, scarcity of multilingual mitigation experiments) while cataloging common issues encountered and solutions implemented in adapting bias benchmarks across languages and cultures. Drawing from the implications of our findings, we chart directions for future research that can reinforce the multilingual bias literature’s inclusivity, cross-cultural appropriateness, and alignment with state-of-the-art NLP advancements.

Recommender systems have become increasingly vital in our daily lives, helping to alleviate the problem of information overload across various user-oriented online services. The emergence of Large Language Models (LLMs) has yielded remarkable achievements, demonstrating their potential for the development of next-generation recommender systems. Despite these advancements, LLM-based recommender systems face inherent limitations stemming from their LLM backbones, particularly issues of hallucinations and the lack of up-to-date and domain-specific knowledge.Recently, Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) has garnered significant attention for addressing these limitations by leveraging external knowledge sources to enhance the understanding and generation of LLMs. However, vanilla RAG methods often introduce noise and neglect structural relationships in knowledge, limiting their effectiveness in LLM-based recommendations. To address these limitations, we propose to retrieve high-quality and up-to-date structure information from the knowledge graph (KG) to augment recommendations. Specifically, our approach develops a retrieval-augmented framework, termed K-RagRec, that facilitates the recommendation generation process by incorporating structure information from the external KG. Extensive experiments have been conducted to demonstrate the effectiveness of our proposed method.