Asynchronous psychological counseling (APC) represents a crucial mental health service modality that transcends temporal and spatial constraints. However, its development faces significant data scarcity challenges: due to stringent privacy protection requirements and professional ethical considerations, direct collection of conversational data from authentic APC scenarios is virtually impossible. To address this challenge, we design a self-optimizing multi-agent framework for counseling dialogue generation, CFlowPsy, which utilizes a small amount of real anonymized counseling cases as seed data to synthesize diverse problem-solving-oriented APC conversations through large language models. Specifically, the framework employs a Persona-Flow module to continuously track and update clients’ basic information, real-time emotions, and counseling progress, providing dynamic personalized analytical support for counselors and enabling self-optimization of generated dialogues. Simultaneously, the framework ensures that generated interventions contain explicit reasoning processes, demonstrating clear psychological analysis and logic, thereby enhancing the accuracy and consistency of responses. Under this framework, we develop the first Chinese APC dataset, CFlowPsyD, comprising 1,700 high-quality extended conversations. Extensive experiments and human evaluations confirm that the proposed CFlowPsyD dataset successfully simulates human-like APC processes.

Model editing provides a promising mechanism for updating large language models (LLMs) without expensive retraining. Existing approaches, particularly locate-and-edit methods based on least-squares optimization, aim to introduce targeted knowledge changes while preserving pre-trained behavior. In this work, we show that this objective is fundamentally fragile under standard single-edit evaluation protocols. We first develop a unified theoretical framework that characterizes activation-based editing as a constrained intervention on intermediate representations. Within this framework, we demonstrate that least-squares edits cannot, in general, isolate target updates from unrelated activations, giving rise to unavoidable interference that accumulates with successive edits. Crucially, this degradation can remain undetected in single-edit settings when assessed using conventional success and locality metrics. To expose such hidden instabilities, we introduce an uncertainty-based evaluation protocol that combines structured semantic perturbations with uncertainty quantification based on Sampling with Perturbation for UQ. By measuring edit-induced growth in aleatoric and epistemic uncertainty, our method reveals local knowledge conflicts that are invisible to existing benchmarks. Extensive experiments across multiple models, datasets, and editing algorithms show that both least-squares and other parameter-update-based methods consistently increase post-edit uncertainty. Together, our results suggest that current evaluation practices substantially overestimate the reliability of single-edit model editing, and that uncertainty-based diagnostics are necessary for assessing edit stability.

Computational narrative analysis aims to capture rhythm, tension, and emotional dynamics in literary texts. Existing large language models can generate long stories but overly focus on causal coherence, neglecting the complex story arcs and orchestration inherent in human narratives. This suggests a structural misalignment between model- and human-generated narratives.We therefore position narrative analysis as a diagnostic proxy for generation and propose VISTA Space, a high-dimensional framework for narrative orchestration that unifies human and model perspectives while jointly characterizing narrative function and structure in a common space.We further introduce LitVISTA, a structurally annotated benchmark grounded in literary texts, which operationalizes VISTA Space for systematic evaluation of models’ narrative orchestration capabilities. Under an oracle setting with gold event anchors, we evaluate frontier LLMs including GPT, Claude, Grok, and Gemini. Results reveal systematic deficiencies, as current models struggle to jointly capture narrative function and structure and fail to form an integrated global view of literary narrative orchestration. End-to-end analysis further shows that failures are dominated by anchor identification and localization errors. Even advanced thinking modes yield mixed and often limited gains for literary narrative understanding.

Large Reason Models (LRMs) extend long reasoning process to solve complex tasks. However, due to the lack of fine-grained control, they often suffer from overthinking and erroneous reasoning problems, risking accuracy loss. To address this issue, we introduce Reasoning Direction Steering (RDS) to enable fine-grained control over LRMs’ reasoning behaviors by aligning reasoning trajectories with specific cognitive patterns. We develop a simple yet effective paradigm, Thinking Intervention, which explores two key dimensions - intervention positions and intervention styles - to achieve integration intervention throughout model reasoning processes. To validate the effectiveness of our approach, we conduct comprehensive experiments on multi-hop question answering tasks using state-of-the-art LRMs, including Qwen3-Series and R1-Series models. Experimental results demonstrate the efficacy of Thinking Intervention with 9.4% average improvement on R1-Series models and 1.9% improvement on Qwen3-Series models.

Semi-structured tables, with their varied layouts and formatting artifacts, remain a major obstacle for automated data processing and analytics. To address these challenges, we propose RelationalCoder, which uniformly converts semi-structured tables into relational data, enabling smooth integration with the rich ecosystem of data processing and analytics tools. By leveraging SQL code, RelationalCoder prevents schema errors and markedly improves normalization quality across multiple relational tables.To address the challenge of large tables, we propose a new technique called Loop Reference Decoding (LRD): it identifies expandable groups—repeating regions of similar structure and semantics—and replicates each group using a concise loop over its repetitive region by referencing cell addresses, rather than regenerating each individual cell. This design substantially reduces output length from 𝒪(N × M)—proportional to the table’s height (N) and width (M)—to approximately 𝒪(K), where K is the total number of unique cell types within detected expandable groups. As a result, LRD is highly scalable: the larger the input table, the greater the compression ratio. It scales seamlessly to extremely large tables, achieving output reductions of up to 100,000×.We further create the first human-labeled corpus for table transformation, created with a cost-efficient, actively supervised pipeline. Extensive experiments on HiTab and MultiHiertt show that RelationalCoder not only enables programmatic symbolic reasoning but also boosts QA accuracy—raising Llama-2 and Mistral models by more than 20%, and GPT-4o by over 4%. Project page: https://github.com/haoyudong/RelationalCoder.

This paper introduces a task aimed at extracting structured tables from text using natural language (NL) instructions. We present TableCoder, an approach that leverages the symbolic nature of code to enhance the robustness of table structure construction and content extraction. TableCoder first generates Python classes or SQL statements to explicitly construct table structures, capturing semantic ontology, computational dependencies, numerical properties, and format strings. This approach reliably mitigates issues such as structural errors, erroneous computations, and mismatched value types. Subsequently, TableCoder proposes grounded content extraction, populating table cells sequentially and maintaining the exact order in which they are mentioned in the source text. By simulating a grounded “translation” from text to code, this method reduces the likelihood of omissions and hallucinations.Experimental results demonstrate that TableCoder significantly improves F1 scores and mitigates hallucination and computational errors, crucial for high-stakes applications like government data analytics and financial compliance reporting. Moreover, the code-generation-based method naturally integrates with standard SQL databases and Python workflows, ensuring seamless deployment in existing enterprise data pipelines.