LLM agents have made rapid progress on software engineering and ML research tasks, but these advances often assume access to a working runnable environment. For research artifacts released alongside published papers, setting up such an environment from a fresh machine remains a major bottleneck. Existing environment setup benchmarks do not cover the full scope of research-artifact deployment, which involves multi-language toolchains, system-level dependencies beyond containers (e.g., GPU/CUDA and kernel configurations), and legacy artifact compatibility. We introduce DeployBench, a multi-domain benchmark of 51 research-artifact deployment tasks spanning AI/ML, computer systems, and scientific computing, covering all these dimensions. Each task is verified by a hidden pipeline that executes the paper’s designated experiment and checks its outputs. Evaluating five state-of-the-art LLMs with OpenHands yields pass-rates from 7.8%-51.0%. Failures are dominated by a completion-judgment problem: 102 of 181 are agent-terminated self-stops, where the agent’s pre-finish checks validate a different or weaker target than the paper-specific task requires. DeployBench highlights the gap between current agents and autonomous deployment, and offers a realistic testbed for scientific research agents.

Multimodal Large Language Models have achieved strong performance in single-video understanding, yet their ability to reason across multiple videos remains limited. Existing approaches typically concatenate multiple videos into a single input and perform direct inference, which introduces training–inference mismatch, information loss from frame compression, and a lack of explicit cross-video coordination. Meanwhile, current multi-video benchmarks primarily emphasize event-level comparison, leaving identity-level matching, fine-grained discrimination, and structured multi-step reasoning underexplored. To address these gaps, we introduce MVX-Bench, a Multi-Video Cross-Dimension Benchmark that reformulates 11 classical computer vision tasks into a unified multi-video question-answering framework, comprising 1,442 questions over 4,255 videos from diverse real-world datasets. We further propose SAMA, a Skill-Augmented Agentic Framework for Multi-Video Understanding, which integrates visual tools, task-specific skills, and a conflict-aware verification mechanism to support iterative and structured reasoning. Experiments show that SAMA improves substantially over its visual perception backbone and achieves the best average accuracy on MVX-Bench. Ablations confirm the benefits of skill-guided orchestration and conflict-aware verification.

Video Large Multimodal Models (VLMMs) have achieved impressive progress in video understanding, yet they remain limited in adaptive reasoning—the ability to revise conclusions when new evidence emerges. In reality, conclusions are rarely set in stone; additional context can strengthen or weaken an initial inference. To capture this capability, we introduce Defeasible Video Entailment (DVidE), a new task that challenges models to think like doubters, requiring them to dynamically update entailment judgments as evidence evolves. In DVidE, given a video premise and a textual hypothesis, the models must determine whether a new update strengthens or weakens the hypothesis (classification task) or generates a coherent update that modifies the entailment relationship (generation task). For solving the classification task, we propose the Chain of Counterfactual Thought (CoCT) framework, utilizing counterfactual reasoning, ASR-enhanced video content, and rationale refinement to reduce inference bias. For the generation task, we develop a framework that combines ASR output with a Large Language Model (LLM) to produce coherent, contextually relevant updates aligned with the intended strengthener or weakener goals. We also introduce a benchmark dataset with human annotations and an LLM-based evaluation metric for assessing generative performance. Experimental results show substantial improvements across multiple VLMM baselines, demonstrating that CoCT significantly enhances both classification and generation performance and strengthens the dynamic reasoning capabilities of video-language models.

Large language model (LLM) agents have demonstrated remarkable potential in advancing scientific discovery. However, their capability in the fundamental yet crucial task of reproducing code from research papers, especially in the NLP domain, remains underexplored. This task includes unique complex reasoning challenges in the intellectual synthesis of abstract concepts and the comprehension of code repositories with interdependent files. Motivated by this gap, we present LMR-BENCH, a benchmark designed to systematically evaluate the capability of LLM agents on code reproduction from Language Modeling Research. It consists of 28 code reproduction tasks derived from 23 research papers published in top-tier NLP venues over the past five years, spanning nine fundamental categories. Models are provided with a research paper, a code repository containing one or more masked functions, and instructions for implementing these functions. We conduct extensive experiments in standard prompting and LLM agent settings with state-of-the-art LLMs, evaluating the accuracy of unit tests and performing LLM-based evaluation of code correctness. Experimental results reveal that even the most advanced models still exhibit persistent limitations in scientific reasoning and code synthesis, highlighting critical gaps in LLM agents’ ability to autonomously reproduce scientific research.