Instruction-tuned LLMs faced with under-specified queries often commit to a single interpretation rather than ask for clarification, producing confidently wrong answers. In our experiments, prompting alone is insufficient: models either ask for clarification on every query or ask vague questions that fail to recover the missing information. Addressing this failure requires learning two coupled skills: when to ask rather than answer and how to ask a question that recovers the disambiguating information. Existing recipes either address only one of these skills or require a separately trained critic. We propose CIGAsk, an RL recipe that teaches both skills through two complementary reward signals within a multi-turn GRPO loop. Counterfactual Information Gain (CIG) compares the gold-answer log-likelihood under a frozen reference model with and without the user response, providing per-turn credit that guides how to ask. The Asymmetric Ambiguity Bonus assigns a signed reward at the terminal token based on the gold ambiguity label, guiding when to ask. Across three clarification benchmarks spanning table, passage, and open-domain QA, CIGAsk-7B outperforms the strongest external baseline despite using a smaller backbone. It also transfers across datasets without per-dataset tuning while preserving single-turn QA performance on out-of-distribution benchmarks.

Agentic retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) formulates question answering as a multi-step interaction between reasoning and information retrieval, and has recently been advanced by reinforcement learning (RL) with outcome-based supervision. While effective, relying solely on sparse final rewards limits step-wise credit assignment and provides weak guidance for intermediate reasoning and actions. Recent efforts explore process-level supervision, but typically depend on offline constructed training data, which risks distribution shift, or require costly intermediate annotations. We present **TreePS-RAG**, an online, tree-based RL framework for agentic RAG that enables step-wise credit assignment while retaining standard outcome-only rewards. Our key insight is to model agentic RAG reasoning as a rollout tree, where each reasoning step naturally maps to a node. This tree structure allows step utility to be estimated via Monte Carlo estimation over its descendant outcomes, yielding fine-grained process advantages without requiring intermediate labels. To make this paradigm practical, we introduce an efficient online tree construction strategy that preserves exploration diversity under a constrained computational budget. With a rollout cost comparable to strong baselines like Search-R1, experiments on seven multi-hop and general QA benchmarks across multiple model scales show that TreePS-RAG consistently outperforms both outcome-supervised and leading process-supervised RL methods.

GUI agents predict click coordinates as digit-token sequences, but standard text-LLM confidence estimation methods rank correct clicks from wrong ones only weakly. GUI-specific alternatives use K samples or new supervision, but still leave room for improvement. We trace part of this to place-value asymmetry: bounding- box correctness often makes higher-place digits more important than lower-place digits, so uniform aggregation weakens the signal that determines correctness. The fix is to weight each digit’s Shannon entropy by its place value. We call this Place-Aware Coordinate Entropy (PACE). Across fixed-scale agents on ScreenSpot-Pro and ScreenSpot-v2, PACE wins both AUROC and selective accuracy on all primary comparisons in a single forward pass, matching or outperforming K-sample baselines at a fraction of the cost. PACE provides a per-click confidence estimate that turns coordinate-token internals into a practical confidence signal for GUI agent deployment.

Improving context faithfulness in large language models is essential for developing trustworthy retrieval augmented generation systems and mitigating hallucinations, especially in long-form question answering (LFQA) tasks or scenarios involving knowledge conflicts. Existing methods either intervene LLMs only at inference without addressing their inherent limitations or overlook the potential for self-improvement. In this paper, we introduce GenDiE(Generate, Discriminate, Evolve), a novel self-evolving framework that enhances context faithfulness through fine-grained sentence-level optimization. GenDiE combines both generative and discriminative training, equipping LLMs with self-generation and self-scoring capabilities to facilitate iterative self-evolution. This supports both data construction for model alignment and score-guided search during inference. Furthermore, by treating each sentence in a response as an independent optimization unit, GenDiE effectively addresses the limitations of previous approaches that optimize at the holistic answer level, which may miss unfaithful details. Experiments on ASQA (in-domain LFQA) and ConFiQA (out-of-domain counterfactual QA) datasets demonstrate that GenDiE surpasses various baselines in both faithfulness and correctness, and exhibits robust performance for domain adaptation.

Robust evaluation is critical for deploying trustworthy retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) systems. However, current LLM-based evaluation frameworks predominantly rely on directly prompting resource-intensive models with complex multi-stage prompts, underutilizing models’ reasoning capabilities and introducing significant computational cost. In this paper, we present RAG-Zeval (RAG-Zero Evaluator), a novel end-to-end framework that formulates faithfulness and correctness evaluation of RAG systems as a rule-guided reasoning task. Our approach trains evaluators with reinforcement learning, facilitating compact models to generate comprehensive and sound assessments with detailed explanation in one-pass. We introduce a ranking-based outcome reward mechanism, using preference judgments rather than absolute scores, to address the challenge of obtaining precise pointwise reward signals. To this end, we synthesize the ranking references by generating quality-controlled responses with zero human annotation. Experiments demonstrate RAG-Zeval’s superior performance, achieving the strongest correlation with human judgments and outperforming baselines that rely on LLMs with 10-100× more parameters. Our approach also exhibits superior interpretability in response evaluation.

Numerical reasoning over hybrid data containing both textual and tabular content (e.g., financial reports) has recently attracted much attention in the NLP community. However, existing question answering (QA) benchmarks over hybrid data only include a single flat table in each document and thus lack examples of multi-step numerical reasoning across multiple hierarchical tables. To facilitate data analytical progress, we construct a new large-scale benchmark, MultiHiertt, with QA pairs over Multi Hierarchical Tabular and Textual data. MultiHiertt is built from a wealth of financial reports and has the following unique characteristics: 1) each document contain multiple tables and longer unstructured texts; 2) most of tables contained are hierarchical; 3) the reasoning process required for each question is more complex and challenging than existing benchmarks; and 4) fine-grained annotations of reasoning processes and supporting facts are provided to reveal complex numerical reasoning. We further introduce a novel QA model termed MT2Net, which first applies facts retrieving to extract relevant supporting facts from both tables and text and then uses a reasoning module to perform symbolic reasoning over retrieved facts. We conduct comprehensive experiments on various baselines. The experimental results show that MultiHiertt presents a strong challenge for existing baselines whose results lag far behind the performance of human experts. The dataset and code are publicly available at https://github.com/psunlpgroup/MultiHiertt.