Yupei Wang
Author directory2026
What Does Input-Dependent Depth Routing Buy in Data-Limited Language Modeling?
Yupei Wang
Proceedings of the Second BabyLM Workshop
Yupei Wang
Proceedings of the Second BabyLM Workshop
Learned weighting of earlier layers, as used in ELC-BERT (Charpentier and Samuel, 2023), is a promising direction for sample-efficient language modeling. Attention Residuals (AttnRes; Kimi Team et al., 2026) extend this idea by computing input-dependent weights separately for each token, with reported gains in large-scale autoregressive models. We present a controlled study of whether such input-dependent depth routing helps in the data-limited regime where static routing first proved useful. Across the 10M- and 100M-word BabyLM budgets and three paired seeds, AttnRes consistently lowers test negative log-likelihood (NLL) compared to a residual baseline. It reaches the same development-set (dev) NLL after seeing fewer training words. In the 10M L32 control, AttnRes also lowers test NLL relative to static routing in all three seeds. Behavioral differences between AttnRes and the baseline are small and mixed. The BLiMP (Warstadt et al., 2020) advantage at equal training exposure disappears after matching on dev NLL. The trained 10M-word AttnRes models make causal use of routes from nonrecent depth blocks, but we find no clear evidence that categories with greater dependence on these sources achieve larger BLiMP gains over the baseline.
2025
CMT-Eval: A Novel Chinese Multi-turn Dialogue Evaluation Dataset Addressing Real-world Conversational Challenges
Siyu Tian | Kaijie Mo | Yupei Wang | Renfen Hu
Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: EMNLP 2025
Siyu Tian | Kaijie Mo | Yupei Wang | Renfen Hu
Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: EMNLP 2025
Multi-turn dialogue is a key paradigm for interaction between users and Large Language Models (LLMs). However, existing evaluation benchmarks fail to capture users’ evolving needs and how their diverse conversation styles affect the dialogue flow. To address these limitations, we propose CMT-Eval, the first dedicated dataset for fine-grained evaluation of Chinese multi-turn dialogue systems. Built upon a linguistic theory-driven Speech Act Framework, diverse user personas, and varied conversational challenges, CMT-Eval comprises 596 high-quality dialogues with 4,431 turns, simulating realistic, multifaceted, and challenging conversations. Experiments reveal that models struggle with specific speech acts, user personas, and complex scenarios, highlighting the effectiveness of CMT-Eval in assessing LLMs’ multi-turn dialogue capabilities and providing valuable insights for their enhancement. The dataset, code, and prompts are available at https://github.com/hejaida/CMT-Eval.
Does Visual Grounding Enhance the Understanding of Embodied Knowledge in Large Language Models?
Zhihui Yang | Yupei Wang | Kaijie Mo | Zhe Zhao | Renfen Hu
Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: EMNLP 2025
Zhihui Yang | Yupei Wang | Kaijie Mo | Zhe Zhao | Renfen Hu
Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: EMNLP 2025
Despite significant progress in multimodal language models (LMs), it remains unclear whether visual grounding enhances their understanding of embodied knowledge compared to text-only models. To address this question, we propose a novel embodied knowledge understanding benchmark based on the perceptual theory from psychology, encompassing visual, auditory, tactile, gustatory, olfactory external senses, and interoception. The benchmark assesses the models’ perceptual abilities across different sensory modalities through vector comparison and question-answering tasks with over 1,700 questions. By comparing 30 state-of-the-art LMs, we surprisingly find that vision-language models (VLMs) do not outperform text-only models in either task. Moreover, the models perform significantly worse in the visual dimension compared to other sensory dimensions. Further analysis reveals that the vector representations are easily influenced by word form and frequency, and the models struggle to answer questions involving spatial perception and reasoning. Our findings underscore the need for more effective integration of embodied knowledge in LMs to enhance their understanding of the physical world.
2024
Beyond Agreement: Diagnosing the Rationale Alignment of Automated Essay Scoring Methods based on Linguistically-informed Counterfactuals
Yupei Wang | Renfen Hu | Zhe Zhao
Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: EMNLP 2024
Yupei Wang | Renfen Hu | Zhe Zhao
Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: EMNLP 2024
While current Automated Essay Scoring (AES) methods demonstrate high scoring agreement with human raters, their decision-making mechanisms are not fully understood. Our proposed method, using counterfactual intervention assisted by Large Language Models (LLMs), reveals that BERT-like models primarily focus on sentence-level features, whereas LLMs such as GPT-3.5, GPT-4 and Llama-3 are sensitive to conventions & accuracy, language complexity, and organization, indicating a more comprehensive rationale alignment with scoring rubrics. Moreover, LLMs can discern counterfactual interventions when giving feedback on essays. Our approach improves understanding of neural AES methods and can also apply to other domains seeking transparency in model-driven decisions.