As large language models (LLMs) are deployed as autonomous agents, safety failures increasingly involve consequential actions. We study agentic misalignment, where agents take harmful actions under goal conflicts and pressures. Using chain-of-thought (CoT) monitoring, we find that harmful execution is often preceded by intent signals in reasoning. However, post-hoc CoT labels are too coarse to show how intent changes during generation. We introduce INTENT-AS-A-TOOL, an approach that adds intent-targeted tools to give the model a dedicated channel for expressing commitment to a target behavior. The probability of calling an intent tool provides a judge-free, fine-grained signal of the model’s tendency to pursue that behavior. Our results show that INTENT-AS-A-TOOL complements CoT monitoring, expands post-hoc CoT labels into dense trajectories, and identifies critical steps for online intervention. These findings suggest that action preferences are useful for tracking agentic misalignment during reasoning. Our code and data are accessible: https://github.com/RebeccaZhang22/intent-as-a-tool.

Advanced LLMs have achieved near-ceiling instruction-following accuracy on benchmarks such as IFEval. However, these impressive scores do not necessarily translate to reliable services in real-world use, where users often vary their phrasing, contextual framing, and task formulations. In this paper, we study nuance-oriented reliability: whether models exhibit consistent competence across cousin prompts that convey analogous user intents but with subtle nuances. To quantify this, we introduce a new metric, reliable@k, and develop an automated pipeline that generates high-quality cousin prompts via data augmentation. Building upon this, we construct IFEval++ for systematic evaluation. Across 20 proprietary and 26 open-source LLMs, we find that current models exhibit substantial insufficiency in nuance-oriented reliability—their performance can drop by up to 61.8% with nuanced prompt modifications. What’s more, we characterize it and explore three potential improvement recipes. Our findings highlight nuance-oriented reliability as a crucial yet underexplored next step toward more dependable and trustworthy LLM behavior. Our code and benchmark are accessible: https://github.com/jianshuod/IFEval-pp.

Large language models (LLMs) exhibit prompt leakage vulnerabilities, where they may be coaxed into revealing system prompts embedded in LLM services, raising intellectual property and confidentiality concerns. An intriguing question arises: Do LLMs genuinely internalize prompt leakage intents in their hidden states before generating tokens? In this work, we use probing techniques to capture LLMs’ intent-related internal representations and confirm that the answer is yes. We start by comprehensively inducing prompt leakage behaviors across diverse system prompts, attack queries, and decoding methods. We develop a hybrid labeling pipeline, enabling the identification of broader prompt leakage behaviors beyond mere verbatim leaks. Our results show that a simple linear probe can predict prompt leakage risks from pre-generation hidden states without generating any tokens. Across all tested models, linear probes consistently achieve 90%+ AUROC, even when applied to new system prompts and attacks. Understanding the model internals behind prompt leakage drives practical applications, including intention-based detection of prompt leakage risks. Code is available at: https://github.com/jianshuod/Probing-leak-intents.