Training tool-use agents typically relies on outcome-based filtering: Supervised Fine-Tuning (SFT) on successful trajectories and Reinforcement Learning (RL) on pass-rate-selected tasks. However, this paradigm ignores interaction dynamics—successful trajectories may lack error recovery or exhibit redundancy, while pass rates fail to distinguish structurally informative tasks from trivial ones. To bridge this gap, we propose TopoCurate, an interaction-aware framework that shifts the paradigm from linear outcome filtering to topological interaction modeling. By projecting multi-trial rollouts into a unified semantic quotient topology within the same task, we construct a structured manifold that explicitly captures the divergence between success and failure pathways across tool invocations and environmental responses. Leveraging this representation, we introduce a dual-selection mechanism: for SFT, we prioritize trajectories demonstrating reflective recovery, semantic efficiency, and strategic diversity to mitigate covariate shift and mode collapse; for RL, we select tasks with high error branch ratios and strategic heterogeneity, maximizing gradient Signal-to-Noise Ratio to address vanishing signals in sparse-reward settings. Evaluations on BFCLv3 and Tau2 Bench show that TopoCurate achieves consistent gains of 4.2% (SFT) and 6.9% (RL) over state-of-the-art baselines.

Agentic workflows, composed of multiple collaborating Large Language Models (LLMs), have become a key paradigm for complex problem-solving. However, their effectiveness is often hindered by three critical challenges: high manual design costs, inefficient agentic search, and poor dynamic adaptability to new tasks and human preferences. To address these limitations, we propose HFlow, an evolutionary framework for generating agentic workflows through human-agent collaboration. HFlow employs an evolutionary algorithm to automate the search for optimal workflows by mutating and crossing over their structures, prompts, and LLM backbones. This process is guided by human preferences to ensure rapid convergence, while a hierarchical experience memory enables the generalization of learned strategies. Extensive experiments on math and code generation benchmarks show HFlow surpasses other automated baselines by up to 27.34%, while achieving comparable performance to o1-preview at only one-fourth of the cost. Our work introduces a new paradigm for workflow design that produces cost-effective and adaptive solutions, better aligning automated agentic systems with dynamic human needs.

Reinforcement learning with verifiable rewards (RLVR) has become a standard paradigm for post-training large language models (LLMs). While Group Relative Policy Optimization (GRPO) is widely adopted, it suffers from sparse reward signals and loses gradients entirely when all responses within a group receive identical rewards. On-policy distillation (OPD) offers a natural remedy by providing dense, token-level supervision from a teacher model. However, naively combining GRPO with OPD leads to degraded performance, due to three underlying causes: not all samples benefit from distillation; fitting too quickly to the teacher undermines the exploratory capacity of RL; and OPD’s advantages are asymmetric, suppressing most tokens. To address these challenges, we propose RSTG (Recovering Learning Signals via Adaptive Teacher Guidance), which applies distillation selectively and precisely where it matters most. At the sample level, OPD is restricted to negative zero-variance prompts with each sample weighted by the teacher’s confidence score. At the token level, distillation targets only tokens with high student entropy or large teacher-student divergence. We further augment training with SFT on correct trajectories generated by the teacher model, injecting positive gradient signals where RL yields none. Experiments demonstrate that RSTG substantially outperforms naive GRPO+OPD by +4.02% on math and +3.05% on code.

Fine-tuning pre-trained large language models (LLMs) on downstream tasks has achieved significant success across various domains. However, as model sizes grow, traditional first-order fine-tuning algorithms incur substantial memory overhead due to the need for activation storage for back-propagation (BP). The BP-free Memory-Efficient Zeroth-Order Optimization (MeZO) method estimates gradients through finite differences, avoiding the storage of activation values, and has been demonstrated as a viable approach for fine-tuning large language models. This work proposes the Multiple-query Memory Efficient Zeroth-Order (MUZO) method, which is based on variance-reduced multiple queries to obtain the average of gradient estimates. When combined with Adam optimizer, MUZO-Adam demonstrates superior performance in fine-tuning various LLMs. Furthermore, we provide theoretical guarantees for the convergence of the MUZO-Adam optimizer. Extensive experiments empirically demonstrate that MUZO-Adam converges better than MeZO-SGD and achieves near first-order optimizer performance on downstream classification, multiple-choice, and generation tasks.