Yuxuan Chen

Author directory

Other people with similar names: Yuxuan Chen, Yuxuan Chen, Yuxuan Chen, Yuxuan Chen

Unverified author pages with similar names: Yuxuan Chen


2026

Large language models pre-trained on code (Code-LLMs) have achieved remarkable performance on coding tasks. Despite their success of processing programming language, their application to natural language tasks has largely been limited to narrow tasks and ad-hoc model selection. In this paper, we present Code-Prompt, a comprehensive prompt-based framework to benchmark Code-LLMs over ten NLP tasks. We evaluate Code-Prompt on 13 Code-LLMs using code-aligned prompts and compare them with their parallel natural language LLMs (NL-LLMs) using natural language prompts.

Our results show that Code-LLMs perform on par with NL-LLMs across a range of NLP tasks, while producing more format-consistent generation with less redundancy. Our cross-lingual experiments further indicate that knowledge in Code-LLMs is well shared among different programming languages, whereas performance across different human languages still varies significantly. All our code and data will be made publicly available at https://github.com/chen-yuxuan/code-prompt.

2024

This survey analyses how external knowledge can be integrated into language models in the context of retrieval-augmentation.The main goal of this work is to give an overview of: (1) Which external knowledge can be augmented? (2) Given a knowledge source, how to retrieve from it and then integrate the retrieved knowledge? To achieve this, we define and give a mathematical formulation of retrieval-augmented knowledge integration (RAKI). We discuss retrieval and integration techniques separately in detail, for each of the following knowledge formats: knowledge graph, tabular and natural language.

2022

Relation classification models are conventionally evaluated using only a single measure, e.g., micro-F1, macro-F1 or AUC. In this work, we analyze weighting schemes, such as micro and macro, for imbalanced datasets. We introduce a framework for weighting schemes, where existing schemes are extremes, and two new intermediate schemes. We show that reporting results of different weighting schemes better highlights strengths and weaknesses of a model.