Zeyu Wang
Author directoryOther people with similar names: Zeyu Wang, Zeyu Wang
Unverified author pages with similar names: Zeyu Wang
2026
ComfySearch: Autonomous Exploration and Reasoning for ComfyUI Workflows
Jinwei Su | Qizhen Lan | Zeyu Wang | Yinghui Xia | Hairu Wen | Yiqun Duan | Xi Xiao | Yang Jingsong | Lewei He | Tianyu Shi
Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: EMNLP 2026
Jinwei Su | Qizhen Lan | Zeyu Wang | Yinghui Xia | Hairu Wen | Yiqun Duan | Xi Xiao | Yang Jingsong | Lewei He | Tianyu Shi
Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: EMNLP 2026
AI-generated content has progressed from monolithic models to modular workflows, especially on platforms like ComfyUI, allowing users to customize complex creative pipelines. However, the large number of components in ComfyUI and the difficulty of maintaining long-horizon structural consistency under strict graph constraints frequently lead to low pass rates and workflows of limited quality. To tackle these limitations, we present ComfySearch, an agentic framework that can effectively explore the component space and generate functional ComfyUI pipelines via validation-guided workflow construction. Experiments demonstrate that ComfySearch substantially outperforms existing methods on complex and creative tasks, achieving higher executability (pass) rates, higher solution rates, and stronger generalization.
2024
CausalBench: A Comprehensive Benchmark for Evaluating Causal Reasoning Capabilities of Large Language Models
Zeyu Wang
Proceedings of the 10th SIGHAN Workshop on Chinese Language Processing (SIGHAN-10)
Zeyu Wang
Proceedings of the 10th SIGHAN Workshop on Chinese Language Processing (SIGHAN-10)
Causal reasoning, a core aspect of human cognition, is essential for advancing large language models (LLMs) towards artificial general intelligence (AGI) and reducing their propensity for generating hallucinations. However, existing datasets for evaluating causal reasoning in LLMs are limited by narrow domain coverage and a focus on cause-to-effect reasoning through textual problems, which does not comprehensively assess whether LLMs truly grasp causal relationships or merely guess correct answers. To address these shortcomings, we introduce a novel benchmark that spans textual, mathematical, and coding problem domains. Each problem is crafted to probe causal understanding from four perspectives: cause-to-effect, effect-to-cause, cause-to-effect with intervention, and effect-to-cause with intervention. This multi-dimensional evaluation method ensures that LLMs must exhibit a genuine understanding of causal structures by correctly answering questions across all four dimensions, mitigating the possibility of correct responses by chance. Furthermore, our benchmark explores the relationship between an LLM’s causal reasoning performance and its tendency to produce hallucinations. We present evaluations of state-of-the-art LLMs using our benchmark, providing valuable insights into their current causal reasoning capabilities across diverse domains. The dataset is publicly available for download at https://huggingface.co/datasets/CCLV/CausalBench